Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54622
|
| Title: | 社會互動排名與學習夥伴推薦機制對於激發潛水者之成效評估研究
A study on assessing the effects of social interaction ranking and learning partner recommendation mechanisms on motivating E-learning lurkers |
| Authors: | 徐慧芸
Hsu, Hui Yun |
| Contributors: | 陳志銘
Chen, Chih Ming
徐慧芸
Hsu, Hui Yun |
| Keywords: | 問題導向學習
社會互動排名
學習夥伴推薦
激勵機制
潛水者
problem-based learning
social interaction ranking
learning partner recommendation
motivation mechanism
lurker |
| Date: | 2011 |
| Issue Date: | 2012-10-30 11:25:51 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 潛水是網路社群中的普遍行為，並且潛水者常為網路社群中的多數，通常潛水者從社群中獲取得多，但卻貢獻得少，雖然對於整體社群無害，但對於網路社群的貢獻卻相當有限，無助於整體社群的發展與成長。因此，如何激發潛水者更積極參與互動討論，樂於貢獻一己之力，對於網路社群的發展甚為關鍵。特別是在數位學習環境中，更應該積極發展有效激發潛水者策略，以促進潛水者更積極參與社群互動討論的意願，提昇整體社群合作學習動力。而透過讓潛水者感受到自己參與社群互動的重要，提昇潛水者的社會知覺，是否有助於激發潛水者表現出更積極的互動行為，值得進行深入的探討。
因此，本研究基於提昇潛水者的社會知覺，於問題導向學習環境中發展「社會互動排名」與「學習夥伴推薦」激勵機制，以探究其對於激發潛水者在社群互動之「討論區與訊息區的文章張貼篇數及內容層次」、「四階段問題導向學習閱讀心得寫作成效」，以及學習社群中的「網路密度」、「網路直徑」、「中心度」。除此之外，也探究「外向－內向」、「人際和諧－人際問題」、「信任感－迫害感」等基本人格特質，是否與潛水者被激發與否的成效有關，進而歸納激發潛水者的具體有效策略。
研究結果顯示，具「社會互動排名」與「學習夥伴推薦」激勵機制之問題導向學習平台，對於提昇社群討論互動以及學習成效具有正向顯著效益；激勵機制確實能有效激發潛水者，降低潛水情形，並且實施激勵機制對於凝聚整體學習社群網絡亦具有正向的效用。
Lurking is a common behavior in the network community, and lurkers often take the majority in the network community. They often get more from the community, but give less to it. To the whole community, although it doesn’t do any harm, the contribution they make to the network community is so limited, which can’t help the development and growth of the entire community. Therefore, it is quite crucial for the development of the network community about how to motivate the lurkers to participate in the interactive discussion and contribute to the community actively. Especially in the digital learning environment, it should actively develop the strategies to motivate the lurkers effectively, so as to promote the willingness of the lurkers to participate in the interactive discussion of the community more actively. In this way, it can improve the driving force of the cooperative learning in the community. It deserves deep exploration about whether it can help to motivate the lurkers to present more active behaviors in the interaction by making them feel important to participate in the community interaction and improving their social awareness.
Therefore, based on the purpose of improving the social awareness of the lurkers, this study develops the motivation mechanism of “social interaction ranking” and ” learning partner recommendation” in the learning-oriented environment to explore the effects of motivating the lurkers in the community interaction, such as “the number and content levels of the articles posted in the forum and bulletin board”, “writing effects of the four-stage problem-based learning and reading”, as well as the “network density”, “network diameter” and “concentration” in the learning community. Besides, it also discusses whether the basic personality is correlated to the effect of motivating the lurkers, including “introversion-extraversion”, “interpersonal problems- interpersonal harmony”, “sense of persecution- sense of trust”, so as to further summarize the concrete and effective strategies of motivating the lurkers.
The study results show the problem-based learning platform with the motivation mechanism of “social interaction ranking” and ” learning partner recommendation” show positive and significant benefits to improve the social discussion interaction and learning effect. Moreover, the motivation mechanism system is proven to motivate the lurkers and reduce the lurking situation effectively, and the practice of the motivation mechanism system has positive effect on the cohesion of the whole learning community. |
| Reference: | 英文文獻
Adams, J. S. & W. B. Rosenbaum (1965) .The Relationship of Worker Productivity to Cognitive Dissonance About Wage Inequities.Journal of Applied Psychology, 46, 161-164.
Alderfer, C. P. (1969). An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,4, 142-175.
Bandura, A. (1983). Temporal dynamics and decomposition of reciprocal determinism: A Reply to Phillips and Orton. Psychological Review, 90(2), 166-170.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life . Wiley, New York.
Borgatti, S.P. (1998). What Is Social Network Analysis? .Retrieved, Jan 10, 2011 from http://www.analytictech.com/networks/whatis.htm.
Brown, J.J. and Reingen, P.H. (1987) . Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 350-362.
Burnett, Gary (2000) .Information exchange in virtual communities: a typology. Information Research,5(4). Retrieved Jan 12, 2011 from the World Wide Web:http://informationr.net/ir/5-4/paper82.html.
Burt, R. S.(1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
Chih-Ming Chen & Chia-Cheng Chang (2012): Mining learning social networks forcooperative learning with appropriate learning partners in a problem-based learning environment. Interactive Learning Environments, DOI:10.1080/10494820.2011.641677.
Delisle, R. (1997).How to use problem-based learning in the classroom. Alexandria, VA:Association Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Dictionary, J.(2006). Lurker Definition. Retrieved, Jan 10, 2011 from www.netmeg.net/jargon.
Draper, S.(1997, December) Lurking and Learning. Retrieved, October 4, 2011 from http://www.psy.gla.ac.uk/~steve/LandL.html.
Fischer, C.S.（1977）. Networks and places: Social relations in the urban setting. New York: The Free Press.
Granovetter, Mark S. (1973) . The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6) , 1360-1380.
Greenberg, J. & Liebman, M.(1990). Incentives：The Missing in Strategic Performance. The Journal of Business Strategy, 8-11.
Guan, X. (2006). Reasons for the Formation of Cybernetic Lurkers. Journal of Huaihai Institure of Technology, 4(3), 79-82.
Herzberg, F. B. Maunsner & Snyderman B., (1959). The motivation to work. New York, John Wily & Son.
Herzberg, F. (1968) .One More Time：How Do You Motivate Employees?.Harvard Business Review, 46, 53-62.
Hmelo-Silver, C. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266.
Holliman, R., & Scanlon, E.(2006). Nvestigating cooperation and collaboration in near synchronous computer mediated conferences. Computers & Education, 46(3),322-335.
Homans, G.C.(1958) . Social Behavior as Exchange. The American Journal of Sociology, 597-606.
Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy（1998）.Problem-based learning Matters. Retrieved, Jan 25, 2012 from http://pbln.imsa.edu/resources/PBL_Matters.pdf
Ingram, T. N., Lee, K. S., & Skinner, S. J.(1989). An empirical assessment salesperson motivationc ommitment and job outcomes. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 9, 25-33.
Ivancevich,J.M.&Matteson,M.T（2002）.Organization Behavior and Management. New York, McGraw-Hill.
Jussim, L. (1986). Self-fulfilling prophecies: A theoretical and integrative review. Psychological Review, 94(4), 429-445.
Kast, F. E. (1979). Organization and Management : A System and Contingency Approach .McGraw-Hill , New York.
Katz, J. (1998). Luring the Lurkers. Retrieved, October 4, 2011 from http://slashdot.org/features/98/12/28/1745252.shtml
Kautz, H. and Selman, B. and Shah, M. (1997). The Hidden Web.American Association for Artificial Intelligence, 27-35.
Kollock, P., & Smith, M. A. (1999). Communities in cyberspace. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Lee, J. a& McKendree, J. (1999). Learning vicariously in a distributed environment. Active Learning, 10, 4-9.
Lin, Y. (2005). Understanding students’ technology appropriation and learning perceptions in online learning environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation,University of Missouri, Columbia.
Marsden P. V. (1989). Methods for the Characterization of Role Structures in Network Analysis. In Linton C. Freeman, Douglas R. White, and A. Kimball Romney (eds.)Research Methods in Social Network Analysis. Book News,489-530.
Maslow,A.H. (1954).Motivation and Personality. New York, Harper&Row Publishers.
Mason, B. (1999). Issues in virtual ethnography. Paper presented at the Esprit i3 Workshop on Ethnographic Studies, Edinburgh.
Mayer, R.C. & Davis, J.H.(1995) . An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
McClelland, D. C.(1961).The Achieving Society. New York, D. Van Nostrand Company.
McDonald, J. (2003). Lurking from a Legitimate Peripheral Participation perspective. CPsquare Foundations of Communities of Practice Workshop. Retrieved, May 20, 2011 from http://www.groups-that-work.com/GTWedit/GTW/lurkerprojectcopworkshopspring03rev.pdf
Mitchell, J. C. (1969). Social networks and urban situations. Manchester University Press.
Morsund, D. (2003). Project-based learning: using information technology（2nd ed.）.OR: International Society for Technilogy in Education.
Nita Schultz & Brad Beach(2004).From lurkers to posters. Australian National Training Authority. Retrieved, May 20, 2011 from http://westone.wa.gov.au/toolboxes/taa_elearn/toolbox12_10/espace/docs/lurkerstoposters.pdf
Nonnecke,B.,&Preece,J.(2000).Lurker demographics: Counting the silent.In Proceedings of CHI 2000. The Hague,Netherlands: ACM.
Nonnecke, B. & Preece, J.(2001). Why lurkers lurk. Retrieved, Jan 10, 2011 from http://www.socs.uoguelph.ca/~nonnecke/research/whylurk.pdf
Nonnecke,B., Preece, J. & Andrews, D. (2003). The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone. Retrieved, Jan 10, 2011 from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563203000876
Nonnecke, B., Preece, J., & Andrews, D.(2004). What lurkers and posters think of each other. Paper presented as part of the proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences – 2004, Hawaii, USA.
Nonnecke,B., Preece, J., Andrews, D. & Voutour, R. (2004). Online Lurkers Tell Why. Proceedings of the Tenth Americas Conference on Information Systems,New York.
OR-Bach, R., & Van Joolingen, W. R.(2004).Designing adaptive interventions for online collaborative modeling. Education and Information Technologies, 9(4), 355–375.
Patricia Wallace (1999). The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
Pei-Luen,P. R.,Qin, G. and Yinan, G. (2008).Relationship between the level of intimacy and lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2757-2770.
Poole, M. S., & Holmes, M. E. (1995).Decision development in computer-assisted group decision making. Human Communication Research, 22(1),90-127.
Preece J, Nonnecke B, Andrews D. (2004) .The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone.Comput Human Behav.Mar;20(2) ;201–223. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.015.
Rafaeli, S., Ravid, G. & Soroka, V. (2004) .De-lurking in virtual communities: a social communication network approach to measuring the effects of social and cultural capital.Paper presented to the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences,Hawaii, USA.
Robbins, S. P.(1982) . Personnel: The Management of Human Resources. Englewood Cliff, N. J.: Prentice-Hall.
Robbins, Stephen P. (1998). Organizational behavior, (8th ed) New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Sage, S. M. (2000). A natural fit: Problem-based learning and technology standards. Learning & Leading with Technology, 28(1), 6-12.
Scott John (2000).Social Network analysis: a Handbook,eds. New Delhi.Thousand Oaks London: Sage.
Skinner, B.F. (1971). Beyond freedom and Diginity. New York, Fred A.Knopf ,Inc.
Taylor, J.C. (2002). Teaching and Learning Online: The Workers, The Lurkers and The Shirkers. Keynote address presented at the 2nd Conference on Research in Distance & Adult Learning in Asia:CRIDALA 2002, Hong Kong, 5-7 June.
Thomas, J. W., Mergendoller, J.R., & Michaelson, A.(1999). Project-based learning: A handbook for middle and high school teachers. Novato, CA: The Buck Institute for Education.
Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and Motivation. New York,John Wiley.
Vygotsky, L.(1978). Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
Waldrop, H. A.(1987).The Rewards of Noncash Incentives. Sales and Marketing Management, 110-112.
Wasserman, S. & Faust, K（1994）.Social network analysis: methods and applications.New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, W. & Storck, J.(2001).Peripheral Members in Online Communities. Proceedings of AMCIS 2001, Boston MA.
中文文獻
王文科（2001）。教育研究法。臺北市：五南。
王宜敏（2000）。影響資訊人員知識分享行為之因素—以社會交換理論為基礎來探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所，高雄市。
王思峰、鄭尹茹（2005）。線上與線下世界的交錯：校園線上學習的社會網絡分析。資訊社會研究，（8）3，155-192。
朱寶榮（2004）。應用心理學教程。清華大學出版社。
任慶宗(2003)。集團企業子公司之綜效利益與彈性限制—網絡觀點。未出版之博士論文，國立政治大學企業管理研究所，臺北市。
何金原、王秉鈞（1999，10月）。虛擬社群代幣機制之研究。載於國立中山大學「台灣區網際網路研討會論文集」，高雄市。
何嘉惠、葉育呈（2007）。運用網絡分析探討實務社群之信任關係與知識分享。經營管理論叢，（1）3，17-28。
李郁薇（2005）。網路學習社群中的潛水現象：一種被忽略的充分參與。未出版之碩士論文，國立中央大學學習與教學研究所，中壢市。
呂貫文（1999）。大學生使用網際網路行為及其影響因素之相關研究-以靜宜大學學生為例。未出版之碩士論文，私立靜宜大學青少年兒童福利學系，臺中市。
吳美瑩（2001）。網路成文規範與使用者行為之初探─以台大椰林風情電子佈告欄政治版為例。未出版之碩士論文，國立交通大學傳播研究所，新竹市。
吳肇銘（2010）。訊息涉入、社會網絡連結強度、主觀任務價值對網路訊息傳遞意願影響之研究—以電子郵件訊息為例。管理與資訊學報，15，183-212。
林甘敏、陳年興（2001，4月）。網路大學學習問題探討。載於國立中央大學「第五屆全球華人學習科技研討會論文集/第十屆國際電腦輔助教學研討會」大會研究論文集(頁266-273)，中壢市。
林奇賢、沈滄鉉（2000）。網路主題探索式課程與應用環境的設計。亞太成人教育，1（1），1-23。
林意文（2008）。知識社群網路潛水者潛水行為之探討。未出版之碩士論文，國立高雄第一科技大學資訊管理系，高雄市。
林建煌（2001）。管理學。臺北市：智勝。
林麗娟（2002）。「問題導向學習」在網路資源式學習之應用。教學科技與媒體，60，42-53。
邱貴發（1998）。網路世界中的學習：理念與發展。教育研究資訊，6(1)，20-27。
洪榮昭、林展立（2005）。問題導向學習課程發展理論與實務。臺北市：師大書苑。
高申春（2001）。人性輝煌之路－班杜拉的社會學習理論。臺北市：貓頭鷹。
翁崇恩（2005）。從「人性」看網路學習中社群的重要性。T & D 飛訊，35，1-20。
陳向明（2002）。社會科學質的研究。台北：五南。
許全佑（2004）。以社會網路分析方法探討線上學習社群之形成與發展特徵。未出版之碩士論文，私立淡江大學資訊管理學系，臺北市。
許禎元（2004）。社會科學信度與效度的檢定及其關聯性，醒吾學報，27，1-23。
教育部（2006）。通識教育中程綱要計畫（第一年/ 96-99年度）：通識教育領航、行動與整合計畫。審議編號：96-1201-05-0003。上網日期：2012年1月25日。網址：http://hss.edu.tw/upload/user/file/GE/9699geproject.pdf
游光昭、蔡福興（2001）。網路化問題導向式學習環境之設計。生活科技教育，34（12），18-23。
黃怡婷（2008）。專題導向式學習融入基礎科學教學對高中學生學習之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所，彰化市。
黃剛銘（2003）。虛擬社群激勵機制之研究。未出版之碩士論文，私立南華綜合大學管理研究所，嘉義縣。
黃琮良（2005）。非同步網路教學運用於國小資訊學習之行動研究。未出版之碩士論文，國立屏東師範教育科技研究所，屏東市。
張春興（1980）。心理學。臺北市：東華。
張春興（1996）。教育心理學。臺北市：東華。
張春興（1991）。現代心理學：現代人硏究自身問題的科學。臺北市：東華。
張家成（2008）。探勘合作式學習社會網路支援問題導向學習之學習夥伴推薦。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學工業教育學系，臺北市。
張思涵（2010）。台灣網路使用者潛水行為之研究－以PTT「網購板」為例。未出版之碩士論文，私立中國文化大學新聞系，臺北市。
張紳震（2000）。失聲？無聲？-網路貢獻者(contributor)與潛水族(Lurker)沈默考量原素初探研究︰以元智大學為例。發表於「清華大學社會學研究所網路與社會研究中心研討會論文」，新竹市。
張基成（2003）。網路學習社群之經營與管理。T & D 飛訊，8，1-11。
楊孝濚（1989）。內容分析。載於楊國樞、文崇一、吳聰賢、李亦園編，社會及行為科學研究法，809-831。臺北市：東華。
褚麗絹、黃剛銘、蔡坤哲（2004）。網路虛擬社群激勵機制之研究。出版與管理研究，1（1），61-78。
熊瑞梅（1995）。社會網路的資料蒐集、測量與分析。在章英華、傅仰止與瞿海源編著，社會調查與分析：社會社科學研究方法檢討與前瞻之一(頁313-356)。臺北市：中央研究院民族學研究所。
劉軍（2009）。整體網分析講義-UCINET軟件實用指南。上海：格致出版社。
蔡昌智（2005）。不同激勵機制對網路學習活動參與程度之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺南大學資訊教育研究所，臺南市。
蔡昌智、林奇賢（2005）。激勵機制對網路學習成效之影響。資訊科學應用期刊。1（1），33-44。
鄭夙珍（2002）。小組探究教學結合網路學習成效初探。教育研究資訊，10(5)，111-136。
謝仰哲（2008）。國中生友誼與學習諮詢網路之社會網路分析。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺灣師範大學資訊教育學系，台北市。
顏百鴻（2009）。不同激勵機制對國小六年級學童網路學習意願、參與程度及滿意度之影響。未出版之碩士論文，國立臺南大學教育學系科技發展與傳播研究所，臺南市。
顏榮泉、陳明溥（2006）。知識擷取與社群參與導向之網路專題學習成效及互動探討。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，67-89。 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
圖書資訊學數位碩士在職專班
99913004
100 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099913004 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 300401.pdf | 2734Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 707 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
