Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/54959
|
Title: | 廠商聯合行為與政府反托拉斯之策略互動 Interaction between joint ventures and the antitrust authority |
Authors: | 林葦杭 Lin, Wei Hang |
Contributors: | 王智賢 Wang, Jue Shyan 林葦杭 Lin, Wei Hang |
Keywords: | 反托拉斯 卡特爾 聯合行為 租稅優惠 創新研發 R&D 資訊不對稱 Antitrust Cartel joint venture tax incentives innovative development R&D information asymmetry |
Date: | 2011 |
Issue Date: | 2012-10-30 14:27:16 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 為了維護全球經濟的穩定與公平,近年來各國無不致力於反壟斷政策的執行,以期有效打擊卡特爾式的企業聯合行為。本文從三種不同的環境條件下,逐一探討採取聯合行為的廠商和反托拉斯政府之間的互動情況。透過本研究可發現,廠商在以利潤為優先考量下,來決定是否採取聯合結盟,以及合法或非法的合作型態。此外,為了朝全社會效率極大的目標邁進,本文針對三種環境設定下的均衡結果進行效率性的比較,得知其差異的成因在於政府和廠商報酬差異的大小。 In order to keep the stability and fairness of global economy, most of the authorities around the world have been fighting for cutting down cartels by implementing Antitrust/Competition Law. In this paper, we analyze the interaction between joint ventures and antitrust authorities in three different cases. And we find that profit always takes priority in firms’ decision, no matter how the economic environment changes. Finally, in discussing social utility, we compare efficiency among the three cases, and reach our conclusion that the difference of government’s and firm’s return causes the efficiency or non-efficiency of those optimal strategies. |
Reference: | 一、中文文獻 王銘勇 (2006),「聯合行為寬恕減免責任條款之研究」,《公平交易季刊》,第14卷第1期,75-133。 公平會新聞稿 (2010/7/14),「全統隔熱紙有限公司宣稱『隔熱效果世界第一』 廣告不實罰 30 萬元」。 江逸之 (2010/8/25),「反托拉斯陰影 籠罩 IT 業」,《天下雜誌》,第 454 期。 林毅璋、陳梅英 (2010/12/9),「我4面板廠 遭歐盟重罰175億元」,自由時報。 洪燕忠 (2008),「國際化與創新投入對台灣資訊電子業技術效率之影響評估」,東海大學管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。 曹逸雯 (2011/8/25),「買關鍵字不當招徠客戶,公平會罰大買家 50 萬」,今日新聞網,http://www.nownews.com/2011/08/25/320-2737977.htm。 曹逸雯 (2011/10/8),「桶裝瓦斯 10 月起分波喊漲?公平會主動立案調查」,今日新聞網,http://www.nownews.com/2011/10/08/91-2747884.htm。 張麗卿 (2007),「公平交易委員會裁處罰鍰額度之研究」,《公平交易季刊》,第15卷第2期,41-94。 曾巨威 (2008/4/15),《荒腔走板的公平交易委員會決策》,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,財金 ( 評 ) 097-046 號。 曾慧青 (2009/3/18),《國內不實廣告之管理》,財團法人國家政策研究基金會,教文 ( 析 ) 098-014 號。 黃靖萱 (2010/9/8),「小心踩到反托拉斯地雷」,《天下雜誌》,第455 期。 黎明曉 (2010/6/30),「身陷反托拉斯法風暴 除友達外台灣三面板廠認罪」,世界民報。 盧信昌 (2011/3/3),「機車與泡麵經濟學」,中國時報,時論廣場A18版。 蕭照平 (2011/10/6),「咖啡聯漲?公平會列管調查 壟斷就重罰」,中廣新聞網。 譚淑珍 (2011/9/27),「反托拉斯全球化 美國成先鋒」,工商時報。
二、英文文獻 Aubert, C., Rey, P. and Kovacic, W. E. (2006), “The impact of leniency and whistle-blowing programs on cartels,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(6), 1241-1266. Bozeman, B. and Link, A. (1985), “Public support for private R & D: The case of the research tax credit,” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4(3), 370-382. Barros, P. P. (2003), “Looking behind the curtain—Effects from modernization of European Union competition policy,” European Economic Review, 47(4), 613-624. Feess, E. and Walzl, M. (2003), “Corporate leniency programs in the EU and the USA,” German Working Papers in Law and Economics, 2003(24). Frezal, S. (2006), “On optimal cartel deterrence policies,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(6), 1231-1240. Growitsch, C., Nulsch, N. and Rammerstorfer, M. (2012), “Preventing innovative cooperations: the legal exemptions unintended side effect,” European Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 1-22. Levenstein, Margaret C. and Suslow, Valerie Y. (2006), “What Determines Cartel Success?” Journal of Economic Literature, 44(1), 43-95. Metcalf, G. E. (2006), “Federal Tax Policy towards Energy,” NBER(the National Bureau of Economic Research)Working Paper, Tax Policy and the Economy, 21(5), 145-184. Neven, Damien J. (2002), “Removing the notification of agreements: Some consequences for Ex post monitoring,” European integration and international coordination. Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann, 351-362. Polinsky, A. M. (2006), “Optimal fines and auditing when wealth is costly to observe,” International Review of Law and Economics, 26(3), 323-335. Swenson, C.W. (1992), “Some tests of the incentive effects of the research and experimentation tax credit,” Journal of Public Economics, 49(2), 203-218. Shavell, S. (1993), “The optimal structure of law enforcement,” Journal of Law and Economics, 36(1), 255–287. |
Description: | 碩士 國立政治大學 財政研究所 99255022 100 |
Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0992550222 |
Data Type: | thesis |
Appears in Collections: | [財政學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
022201.pdf | 1160Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1483 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|