| Abstract: | 本研究是繼「中國大陸市場轉型時期府際關係之研究-長三角個案」，以及「中國大陸長三角政府職能變遷、調適與比較」之後續性研究計劃。在現階段世界經濟發展進程中，呈現「全球化」(globalization)與「在地化」（localization）特質。就空間尺度而言，生產活動的全球化並未使企業空間分佈分散，反而產生地理群聚(cluster)現象，而呈現「全球在地化」(glocalization)之趨勢。在中國大陸投資之台韓日商亦出現產業與聚居集中之現象，且與母國區位鄰近與偏好有關。由於台韓日商大陸投資與全球生產網路(global production network)連結與競爭力維持有關，因而台韓日商投資過程中與中國地方政府互動與折衝，期能提升生產效率並加速與國際接軌，有關跨界治理運作與制度創新，便是值得探討之議題。在跨區域與跨國區位比較方面，台商主要集中在長三角地區，重點區域為蘇州與昆山；韓商與日商集中在環渤海地區，選定之區域為青島城陽區與大連，期能使本研究具跨界治理運作與台韓日商跨國比較研究學術意義。本文主要採取比較研究途徑。研究方法包括:文獻研究法、深度訪談法、田野調查法、焦點群體訪談法，期能梳理跨界治理議題內涵與跨國比較，相關研究方法之應用在於深入議題主軸、變遷過程與取向。主要研究焦點議題為: （一）中國外資吸引不同階段，跨界治理與參與型態和內涵？（二）中國區域發展不同區位與外商跨界治理特質和互動模式？（三）中國區域經濟發展跨界治理運作中，社會資本有關信任建構、網絡聯結、異質化資源整合與協力網絡運作過程與效應？（四）中國區域經濟發展不同區位與外商，跨界治理影響制度創新和國際接軌面向與程度？（五）台韓日商投資促成中國地方政府制度創新，究係地方政府自發性變革，或是在台日韓商壓力產生影響，抑或雙方妥協之結果？（六）地方政府與外商多元治理結構：持續、變遷與取向，並針對跨界治理與社會資本理論進行理論檢視與對話。
This study examines a comparison of Taiwanese, Japanese and Korean business investment in China within the conceptual framework of transborder governance. I initially worked on the issues of China’s regional development and did research Yangtze River Delta in my previous projects. For this study, I focus on Korean and Japanese business investment in the Bo-Hai Region, and do research on the issue of transborder governance. Using political economy and comparative approaches, the study draws on documentary evidence, field study, focus group interview as well as in-depth interviews with Chinese, Korean and Japanese scholars and officials. Conducting a field study in China will significantly enhance my data, especially regarding domestic and internal affairs and their effects on regional government’s governance changes. This study will explore the following questions: 1) What are the types, interactions and contents of transborder governance and participation during different FDI attraction period in the Yangtze River Delta and Bo-Hai Region? 2) In the operation of transborder governance, what are the process and impacts of the social capital on trust building, network connection, differential resources integration, and collaboration? 3) In different China’s regional economic development, what are the degree and impacts on the institutional innovation and international synchronization in the operation of transborder governance? 4) As for the local government’s institutional innovation, is it the initiative of local government, or the pressure from Taiwanese, Korean and Japanese businesemen, or the compromise made after negotiation that is responsible for such innovation? 5) Do transborder governance and social capital theories explain the experience and changes of Taiwanese, Korean and Japanese business investment in the Yangtze River Delta and Bo-Hai Region? If not, I will offer suggestions to modify these theories. |
