English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 85749/114396 (75%)
Visitors : 22900551      Online Users : 112
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 中國文學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/57410
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/57410


    Title: 融合與重鑄:高友工與當代新儒家
    Other Titles: Blending and Re-composition: Kao Yu-Kung's Theory and Contemporary New Confucianism
    Authors: 曾守正 
    Tseng, Shou-Cheng
    Contributors: 政大中文系
    Keywords: 抒情傳統;美典;境界;當代新儒家
    Lyrical tradition;aesthetics;horizon;Contemporary New Confucianism
    Date: 2011-05
    Issue Date: 2013-03-27 10:31:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 高友工先生的抒情傳統論述, 係為當代重要學說之一, 其影響鉅大, 甚至有 "高友工震盪" 之稱. 當代新儒家的學說, 實為高氏論述的重要基礎, 其牽引抒情傳統的理論內涵, 歷史敘述之完成. 可是, 抒情傳統與新儒家學說的關係, 罕受學術界注意, 討論. 近年來, 王德威先生認為在討論抒情傳統譜系時, 不要忽略五○年代前後新儒家學者的影響. 龔鵬程先生卻以 "戲論" 稱呼高氏學說, 認為高氏對於牟宗三先生學說, "誤解大了" , "完全理解錯亂" ;高氏論藝術精神, 又迥異於徐復觀先生. 就此看來, 高友工先生與當代新儒家的關係, 應有重新釐清之必要. 以道德心性為思想內核的當代新儒家學說, 如何被高氏架接於文學藝術的討論?其洞見與不見為何?本文嘗試從理論內在間架, 理論現實關懷, 歷史敘述等路向, 予以梳理.
    Dr. Yu-Kung Kao's statement of lyrical tradition is one of the distinguished contemporary theory in Chinese studies. His theory has significant impact to the contemporary Sinology, thus some people even call his theory as "Yu-Kung Kao Concussion." The contemporary New Confucianism is the infrastructure of Kao's statement, it constructs the structure of traditional lyric theory, especially in the theory contents and the history texture. However, few discussion associated with the relation between the traditional lyric theory and the Contemporary New Confucianism. Recently, Dr. David Der-wei Wang(王德威) considers that we should not skip the effect of the New Confucianism around 50s' when discussing in the traditional lyric. But Dr. Peng-Cheng Kung(龔鵬程) said Kao's statement is "invalid argument", and considers that Kao totally miss understood Dr. Zhong-san Mao's(牟宗三) concept. Besides, Kao has different viewpoint with Dr. Fu-Kuan Hsu (徐復觀) at art spirit. Hence, it is necessary to clarify the relation between Kao and Contemporary New Confucianism. This article tries to discuss how the Contemporary New Confucianism be constructed in Kao's theory by different phases, including the historical structure, and the inner framework and realistic reflection of the theory.
    Relation: 淡江中文學報,26,79-115
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國文學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    79-115.pdf5239KbAdobe PDF667View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback