English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46094603      Online Users : 832
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/58882


    Title: 校長賦權行為對教師工作滿意度影響之研究-以教師心理氣候為中介變項
    The Study of the Influences of Principal Empowering Behavior on Teacher Job Satisfaction:Teacher Psychological Climate as a Mediator Abstract
    Authors: 傅安生
    Fu, An Sheng
    Contributors: 吳政達
    傅安生
    Fu, An Sheng
    Keywords: 校長賦權行為
    教師工作滿意度
    教師心理氣候
    Principal Empowering Behaivor
    Teacher Psychological Climate
    Teacher Job Satisfaction
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-07-11 18:23:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討我國國民中學校長賦權行為、教師工作滿意度、教師心理氣候之實際情形,並瞭解校長賦權行為對教師工作滿意度的影響以及研究教師心理氣候是否具有中介效果。
    研究方法為文獻分析與問卷調查法,問卷共224份,可用率達100%,問卷回收後分別以因素分析、信度分析、描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關、多元逐步迴歸及逐步階層迴歸分析等統計方法進行研究,根據研究結果與分析後歸納之結論如下:
    一、新北市國民中學教師知覺校長賦權行為為中等程度,以「責任」之知覺程度為最高,「創新績效」之知覺程度最低。
    二、新北市國民中學教師在工作滿意度的知覺為中等程度,以「同僚關係」之知覺程度為最高,「校長領導」之知覺程度最低。
    三、新北市國民中學教師知覺心理氣候程度為中等程度,以「支持管理」之知覺程度為最高,「肯定」之知覺程度最低。
    四、不同背景變項的新北市國民中學教師知覺校長賦權行為、教師心理氣候與教師工作滿意度的程度有差異。
    五、新北市國民中學教師對校長賦權行為、教師心理氣候與教師工作滿意度的知覺,彼此間具有顯著關係。
    六、校長賦權行為與教師心理氣候對教師工作滿意度有顯著聯合預測力,其中以「自主決策」的預測力最高。
    七、教師心理氣候在校長賦權行為對教師工作滿意度的影響上具有中介效果。
    最後,根據研究結果提出建議,以供教育行政機關、國民中學學校校長、教師及後續研究之參考。
    This study aims to investigate the current situation of the juniorhigh school principal empowering behavior, teacher job satisfaction, and teacher psychological climate in Taiwan, and to discuss the influence of Principal Empowering Behavior on teacher job satisfaction and to test whether teacher psychological climate is a significant mediator or not.
    The research process combines literature review and questionnaire method. Totally 296 questionnaires were distributed to schools, and 224 are valid, which the amount of usefulness is 100%. The data is analyzed through the statistics method of factor analysis, reliability analysis, descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson product moment correlation coefficient, multiple stepwise regression analysis and stepwise hierarchical regression analysis.
    The findings are as follows:
    1. Teachers in New Taipei City public schools show median level of perception in principal empowering behavior while “responsibility” is the highest, and “innovative efficiency” is the lowest.
    2. Teachers in New Taipei City public schools show median level of perception in teacher job satisfaction while “colleague relationship” is the highest, and “principal leadership” is the lowest.
    3. Teachers in New Taipei City public schools show median level of perception in teacher psychological climate while “supportive management” is the highest, and "recognition” is the lowest.
    4. Teachers in New Taipei City public schools with different backgrounds show different opinions in principal empowering behavior, teacher job satisfaction, and teacher sychological climate.
    5. The relations among principal empowering behavior, teacher job satisfaction, and teacher psychological climate of teachers in New Taipei City public schools are significant.
    6. Principal empowering behavior and teacher psychological climate show significant predictability to teacher job satisfaction while “self determination” is the highest.
    7. Teacher psychological climate functions as a significant mediator for principal empowering behavior on teacher job satisfaction.
    Finally, according to the findings mentioned above, the research provided suggestions for education administrative organizations, junior high school principals and teachers, and future researches.
    Reference: 中文部分:
    干 雄(2012)。企業領導授權行為與團隊績效關係的實證研究—以廣西中小型企業為例。廣西師範大學經濟管理學院碩士論文。 
    王派土(2004)。桃園縣國民小學組織文化與教師工作滿意度相關之研究。國立新竹教育大學學校行政碩士論文,未出版,新竹市。
    王毓芳(2008)。主管授權賦能領導行為對部屬工作績效的影響。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所,未出版,高雄市。
    何雅婷(2008)。桃園縣國民中學教師工作滿意度與組織承諾關係之研究。中原大學教育研究所,未出版,桃園縣。
    吳明隆(2006)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。臺北市:知城數位科技
    吳清基(1989)。教育與行政。台北:師大書苑。
    李明融(2005)。國民小學校長魅力領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。國立高雄師範大學教育學系碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    李風輝(2012)。承諾型人力資源管理措施在組織承諾、知識分享、心理契約及授權領導之影響下,對台灣高科技產業創新績效之影響。國立成功大學國際經營管理研究所博士班,未出版,台南市。
    周昌柏、范熾文(2006)。國小校長轉型領導、交易領導與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。花蓮教育大學學報,22,255-281。
    林萍娟(2010)。旅館員工之授權賦能與工作滿足及組織承諾之關聯性研究。朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系碩士班,未出版,台中市。
    孫子翔(2011)。員工授權賦能、組織承諾與工作滿足感關係之研究--以台灣電力公司高雄區營業處為例。國立成功大學企業管理學系專班,未出版,台南市。
    孫淑芬(2000)。工作動機對工作滿意、個人績效及組織公民行為的影響-探索組織文化的干擾效果。國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文, 未出版,桃園縣。
    秦夢群(1998)。教育行政-理論部分。臺北市:五南。
    秦夢群(2005)。教育行政-理論部分(5版)。台北:五南。
    張春興(1992)。教育心理學。臺北:華泰。
    曹以招(2011)。陸軍士官的授權賦能、工作態度及其相關因素之研究。國立臺灣師範大學教育學系在職進修碩士班,未出版,台北市。
    莊勝利(2007)。國立高中職校長衝突管理、行政溝通與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    許士軍(1993)。管理學,第十版,台北:東華印書館。
    陳其樑(2009)。高雄縣中等學校心理契約與教師工作滿意度關係之研究。國立中山大學教育研究所碩士論文,未出版,高雄市。
    陳慧珍(2012)。授權賦能、知覺工作特性、人格特質與心理所有權關聯性之研究。國防大學管理學院資源管理及決策研究所,未出版,桃園縣。
    新北市政府教育局(2013)。新北市教育局學校服務國民中學校別、教師人數、班級數,取自http://www.ntpc.edu.tw/_file/2052/SG/25532/D.html
    雷巧玲(2006)。授權賦能研究綜述.科技進步與對策,2006,8:197。
    劉崇義(2001)。顧客滿意之研究 -- 以壽險業為例。中原大學企業管理研究所,未出版,桃園縣。
    潘安堂(2002)。國民小學教師授能與工作滿意關係之研究。國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所碩士論文,未出版,南投縣。
    蔡培村、武文瑛(2004)。領導學。
    閻自安(2000)。臺灣地區國民小學學校本位決策與校長領導方式、教師工作滿意度之關係研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文,未出版,臺北市。
    謝文全(2004)。教育行政學。台北市:高等教育。
    羅世輝、湯雅云(2003)。內外控人格特質與授權賦能認知對工作滿足之影響-以金融保險業為例。人力資源管理學報,3(1),001-019。
    羅明忠(2003)。臺中市國民小學校長領導行為與教師工作滿意度相關之研究。國立臺中師範學院國民教育研究所,未出版,臺中市。
    英文部分:
    Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology ( pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
    Alderfer, C. P. (1972). Existence relatedness and growth. New York: a divison of the Macmillan company.
    Ayan, S., & Kocacik, F. (2010). The relation between the level of job satisfaction and types of personality in high school teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 35(1), 27-41.
    Baron, R. M., &Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual strategic and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
    Bogler, R. (2001). The influence of leadership style on teacher job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 662-683.
    Boren, R . (1994). Don’t delegate-empower. Supervisory Management, 39(10), 10.
    Bowen, D., & Lawler, E.(1992). The empowerment of service workers:what why how and when sloan management review. National Emergency Training Center: Author.
    Brown, S. P., & Thomas W. L. (1996). A new look at psychological climate and its elationship to job involvement effort and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(4), 358-368.
    Chebat, J. C., &Kollias. (2000). The impact of empowerment on customer contact employees’ roles in service organizations. Journal of Service Research, 3(1), 66-81.
    Conger, J. A., & Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process:integrating theory and Practice. Academy of Management Review, 13(3): 81-105.
    Coomber, B., & Barriball, K. L. (2007). Impact of job satisfaction components on intent to leave and turnover for hospital-based nurses: A review of the research literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 44, 297-314.
    Crossman, A., & Harris, P. (2006). Job satisfaction of secondary school teachers. Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 34(1), 29-46.
    Drummond, R. J., & Stoddard, A. (1991). Job satisfaction and work values. Psychological Reports, 69, 1116-1118.
    Feng, B. L. (2007). A study of teacher job satisfaction and factors that influence it. Chinese Education and Society, 40(5), 47-64.
    Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment:a matter of degree. Academy of Management Executive, 9(3), 21-28.
    Friedlander, F., & Margulies, N. (1969). Multiple impacts of organizational climate and individual value systems upon job satisfaction.Personnel Psychology, 22, 171-83.
    Fulford, M. D., & Enz, C. A. (1995). The impact of empowerment on service employees. Journal of Managerial Issues, 7(2), 161-175.
    Gavin, J. F., & Howe, J. G. (1975). Psychological climate:some theoretical and empirical considerations, Behavioral Science, 20, 228-240.
    Getzels, J. W. (1968). Education administrations as a social process. New York: Harper & Row.
    Gruneburg, M. M. (1979). Understanding job satisfaction. London: Macmillan.
    Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    Herzberg, F. (1966). The work and the nature of man. Cleveland, OH: The World Publishing Company.
    Honold, H. (1997). A review of the literature on employee empowerment. Empowerment in Organizations, 5(4), 202-212.
    Hoppock, R. (1935). Job satisfaction. New York: Harper.
    Howard, J. L., & Frick, D. D. (1996). The effects of organizational restructure on employee satisfaction. Group and Organizational Management, 21(3), 278-303.
    Huysman, J. T. (2008). Rural teacher satisfaction: an analysis of beliefs and attitudes of rural teachers’ job satisfaction. The Rural Educator, 29(2), 31-38.
    James, L. A., & Ashe, D. K. (1990). The meaning of organizations: the role of cognition and values, in organizational climate and culture. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: a review of theory and research, Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096-1112.
    Johnson, B. R. (1991). School centralization and organizational effectiveness: The role of teacher alienation (Empowerment). Unpublished doctoral dissertation,The University of Louisina State and Agricultural and Mechanical Col, Florida.
    Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
    Kahn, William A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724.
    Kalleberg, A.L. (1977). Work values and job rewards: a theory of job satisfaction. American Sociological Review, 42, 124-143.
    Kanter, R. M. (1993). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.
    Konczak, L. J. (2000). Defining and measuirng empowering leader behaviors: development of an upward feedback instrument. Edueational and Psychological Measurement, 60(2), 302-308.
    Kopelman, R. E., & Guzzo, R. A. (1990). The role of climate and culture in productivity in organizational climate and culture. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Koys, D. J., & Thomas A. D. (1991). Inductive measures of psychological Climate. Human Relations, 44(3), 265-285.
    Kraimer, M. L., & Seibert, S. E. (1999). Psychological empowerment as a multidimensional construct: a test of construct validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59(1), 127-142.
    Lester, P. E. (1987). Development and factor analysis of the teacher job satisfaction questionnaire (TJSQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(1), 223-233.
    Litwin, G. H., & Stringer R. A. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
    Liu, X. S., & Ramsey, J. (2008). Teachers’ job satisfaction: analyses of the teacher follow-up survey in the united states for 2000-2001. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1173-1184.
    Locke, E.A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Lovelock, C. H. (1983). Classifying services to gain strategic marketing insights. Journal of Marketing, 47, 9-20.
    Marsh, R. M. (1992). A research note:centralization of decision-making in japanese factories. Organization Studies, 13(2), 261-272.
    Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper & Row.
    McBride, M., & Skau, K. (1995). Trust empowerment and reflection: essentials of supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 10, 262-277.
    Menon, S. T. (2001). Employee empowerment:an integrative psychological approach. Applied psychology: An international review, 50(1), 153-180.
    Mishra, A. K., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1998). Explaining how survivors respond to downsizing:the roles of trust empowerment justice and work redesign. Academy of Management Review, 23, 567-588.
    Porter, L.W. (1968). Managerial attitudes and performance. Home-Wood, CA: Richart Dorsey Irwin.
    Pritchard, R. D., & Karasick B. W. (1973). The effect of organizational climate on managerial job performance and satisfaction. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9, 126-146.
    Rizzo, J. R., & Sidney I. L. (1970). Role conflict and ambiguity in complex organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 15, 150-163.
    Robbin, S. P. (1992). Organizational Behavior 6th. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, US: Prentice-Hall.
    Robbins, S. P., & David A. D. (2000). Fundamentals of Management.Prentice hall, Inc,.
    Schneider, B. J., & Virginia M. B. (1980). Employee and customer perceptions of Service in banks replication and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 25, 423-433.
    Seibert, S. E., & Randolph, W. A. (2004).Taking empowerment to the next level:a multiple-level model of empowerment, performance,and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 332-349.
    Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. NY: Fred A. Knopf, Inc .
    Smith, C., & Kendall, L. M. (1969). The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally.
    Spence-Lascbinger, H. K., & Wilk, P. (2001). Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings. Journal of Nursing Arrangement, 31(5), 260-273.
    Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace:dimensions measurement and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
    Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
    Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York, NY: Wiley.
    Weiss, D. J., & Lofquist, L. H. (1967). Manual for the minnesota satisfaction questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, 1-119.
    Witt, L. A., & Nye, L. G. (1992). Gender and the relationship between perceived fairness of pay or promotion and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 910-917.
    Wright, T. A., & Bonett, D. G. (1992). The effect of turnover on work satisfaction and mental health: Support for a situational perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 603-615.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    學校行政碩士在職專班
    99911009
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099911009
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[學校行政碩士在職專班] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    100901.pdf1467KbAdobe PDF2880View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback