政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/59257
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109953/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46227095      Online Users : 469
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59257


    Title: 公司治理、研發投入與企業價值-以台灣電子業為例
    Corporate Governance, R&D and Corporate Value- Evidence of Electronic Firms in Taiwan
    Authors: 林鈺真
    Lin, Yu Chen
    Contributors: 詹凌菁
    Chan, Ling Ching
    林鈺真
    Lin, Yu Chen
    Keywords: 單一家族主導
    公司治理
    創新投入
    企業價值
    family firms
    corporate governance
    innovation investment
    corporate value
    Date: 2011
    Issue Date: 2013-09-02 15:28:56 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討在單一家族主導之企業其公司治理對企業價值之影響。本文利用台灣經濟新報社(TEJ)資料庫,選取2008年至2011年期間之台灣上市上櫃電子業公司作為研究樣本。實證結果顯示,單一家族主導之電子企業,對(1)創新活動之投入而言,最終控制股東超額持股比率及管理階層持股比率越高,越有助於企業創新投入之強度;(2)企業價值而言,創新投入後,最終控制股東超額持股比率、董監事持股及管理階層之持股比率提高時,並不能提升企業價值。
    This study examines the association between corporate governance, R&D investments, and corporate value in family firms. The sample comprises of listed electronic companies in Taiwan from years 2008-2011. The empirical results suggest that family firms with greater ultimate owners’ excess shareholdings and managers’ shareholdings are more intensive innovation investments. However, R&D investments do not enhance corporate value if family firms have greater ultimate owners’ excess shareholdings, directors’ and supervisors’ shareholdings, and managers’ shareholdings.
    Reference: IBM全球企業諮詢服務事業群,2007,軟性製造,商周出版。
    天下雜誌,2012.5.1,【2012年1000大調查】鴻海營收破三兆佔台灣GDP 2成。
    台灣半導體產業協會出版刊物,2009,台灣半導體產業對國家貢獻-摘要。
    行政院國家科學委員會,2010,中華民國科學技術統計要覽。
    吳佳穎,2001,「台灣資訊電子產業研究發展活動與公司經營績效之研究」,國立交通大學科技管理研究所碩士班碩士論文。
    李建然、廖秀梅與廖益興,2003,股權結構、董事獨立性與企業經營績效之研究,會計理論與實務研討會。
    李柏廷,2012,「外資投資決策與創新效率─以中國上市公司為例」,國立政治大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    周淑卿、吳欽杉與陳安琳,2004,電子資訊產業與非電子資訊產業之研究發展支出、股權結構與公司績效之關聯性研究,臺北科技大學學報,第37之2期:267-288。
    林灼榮、鄒季博與蕭莉芃,2007,台灣IC 設計產業公司治理、技術效率與利潤結構之攸關性研究,台灣管理學刊,第7卷,第2期:187-207。
    林宜勉,1999,盈餘資訊性與管理者股權之關聯性研究,企銀季刊,第23期:175-193。
    林宛瑩、汪瑞芝與游順合,2012,研發支出、內部董事與經營績效,會計審計論叢,第2卷,第1期:61-90。
    林敬穎,2009。研究發展支出與廣告支出對於企業價值攸關性之探討:以台灣公司為例,國立成功大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    金成隆、林修葳與紀信義,2004,專利權價值攸關性之研究:以企業生命週期論析,管理學報,第21卷,第2期(4月):175-197。
    金成隆、林修葳與邱煒恒,2005,研究發展支出與資本支出的價值攸關性:以企業生命週期論析,中山管理評論,第13卷,第2期:617-643。
    金成隆與陳俞如,2006,公司治理與專利權:台灣新興市場,管理學報,第23卷,第1期:99-124。
    俞海琴與陳慧娟,1999,我國上市公司成長、槓桿與托賓Q之研究,風險管理學報,第1卷,第1期:81-101。
    洪榮華、陳香如與柯璟瑩,2004,從代理理論的角度探討董事會特性、股權結構與負債之關聯性,管理與系統,第12卷,第4期(10月):3-53。
    高莉華,2004,公司治理對盈餘資訊價值內涵之影響,私立中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    張君豪,1999,研究發展成本、現金流量及盈餘對股價報酬之研究,中原大學會計學系研究所未出版碩士論文。
    屠美亞與陳姿挺,2001,銀行借款、股權結構與公司監管機制,華信金融季刊,第15期:43-54。
    曹壽民、黃仲賢與劉正良,2004,應計項目與非財務指標異常現象之探討,2004第十三屆會計理論與實務研討會論文集,國立政治大學會計學系。
    曹壽民、記信義與劉正良,2007,股市對創新活動的評價是否具有效率性?從研發效率與內部人交易論析,會計評論,第45期(7月):27-55。
    許珮蓉,2007,從企業型態探討創新活動行為─以家族與集團企業為例,國立中央大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    陳忠民,1997,本國產業研究發展經費與利潤、營業額之關連性,交通大學管理科學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    陳威廷,2000,研究發展支出與市場價值關聯性之實證研究,私立中國文化大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃雅琪,1997,台灣電子業品質認證與研究發展經營績效之影響,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    楊幼梅,2002,研究發展支出與未來股票報酬之關連性研究,中原大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    楊朝旭,2004,產品市場競爭可否降低公司內部治理機制不佳所導致的代理成本, 管理學報,第21卷,第2期:153-173。
    經濟部智慧財產局,專利法相關法規。
    葉金標,2009,股權分散對公司利潤影響-理論模型之應用,法制論叢,第43期(1月):1-27。
    葉銀華與邱顯比,1996,資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論,台大管理論叢,第7卷,第2期:57-90。
    詹錦宏與楊麗弘,2001,臺灣上市公司股權結構與經營績效之研究-產業特性與股權質押之觀點,臺灣銀行季刊,第52期:202-220。
    劉正田,1997,研究發展支出之效益及其資本化會計資訊對股票評價攸關性之研究,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版博士論文。
    劉正田,2001,無形資產、成長機會與股票報酬關係之研究,會計評論,第35期(7月):1-29。
    歐進士,1998,我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究,中山管理評論,第6卷,第2期:257-385。
    鄭雯馨,2004,研究發展與專利權對於股票報酬影響之探討,國立政治大學會計研究所未出版碩士論文。
    謝蕙如,2009,智慧資本轉換能力與企業績效之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    蘇明信,2002,高科技產業研究發展支出對企業價值之攸關性,國立中山大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    Aboody, D., and B. Lev. 1998. The value relevance of intangibles: The case of software capitalization. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement): 161- 191.
    Agrawal, A. 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: the case of antitakeover charter amendments. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25: 143-161.
    Ahmed, K., and H. Falk. 2006. The value relevance of management’s research and development reporting choice: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 25: 231-264.
    Alkhafaji, A. F. 1990. Effective board of directors: an overview. Industrial Management and Data Systems 90(4): 18-26.
    Anthony, J. H., and K. Ramesh. 1992. Association between accounting performance measures and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics 15: 203-227.
    Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6: 159-177.
    Barclay M. J., C. G. Holderness, and J. Pontiff. 1993. Private benefits from block ownership and discounts on closed-end funds. Journal of Financial Economics 33(3): 263-291.
    Baysinger, B. D., and R. E.Hoskisson. 1989. Diversification strategy and R&D intensity in multiproduct firms. Academy of Management Journal 32: 310-332.
    Baysinger, B. D., R. D. Kosnik, and T. A. Turk. 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal 34(1): 205-214.
    Baysinger, B., and R. E. Hoskisson. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control. Academy of Management Review 15: 72-87.
    Berle, A., and G. Means. 1932. The Modern Corporation and Private Property. MacMillan.
    Black, E. L. 1998. Life-cycle impacts on the increment value-relevance of earnings and cash flow measure, Journal of Financial Statement Analysis 40: 40-56.
    Bosworth, D., and M. Rogers. 2001. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. The Economic Record 77(239): 323-337.
    Boyd, B. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15: 335-344.
    Bublitz, E., and M. Ettredge. 1989. The information of discretionary outlays: Advertising and research and development. Accounting Review 64 (1): 108–124.
    Claessens, S., and L. Laeven. 2003. Financial development, property rights, and growth. Journal of Finance 58(6): 2401-2436.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporation. Journal of Financial Economics 58: 81-112.
    Coombes, P., and M. Watson. 2000. Three surveys of corporate governance. McKinsey Quarterly 4: 75-78.
    Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
    DeCarolis, D. M., and D. L. Deeds. 1999. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 20: 953-968.
    Dechow, P. 1994. Accounting earnings and cash flows as measures of firm performance: The role of accounting accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17: 3–42.
    Denis, D. J., D. K. Denis, and A. Sarin. 1997. Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. Journal of Finance 52(1): 135-160.
    Denis, D. K., and J. J. McConnell. 2003. International corporate governance. journal of financial and quantitative analysis 38: 1-36.
    Donaldson, L., and J. H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory of agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16 (1).:49-65.
    Eiseberg, T., S. Sundgren, and M. Wells. 1998. Larger board size and decreasing firm value in small firms. Journal of Financial Economics 48: 35-54.
    Fama, E. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
    Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2002. Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33: 401-425.
    Fan, J. P. H., and T. J. Wong. 2005. Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets? Evidence from East Asia. Journal of Accounting Research 43: 35-38.
    Fisman, R., and I. Love. 2003. Trade credit, financial intermediary development, and industry growth. Journal of Finance 58(1): 353-374.
    Francis, J., and A. Smith. 1995. Agency costs and innovation-some empirical evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics 19 (April): 383-409.
    Hall, B. and R. H. Ziedonis. 2001. The patent paradox revisited: An empirical study of patenting in the U.S. semiconductor industry, 1979–1995. The RAND Journal of Economics 32 (March): 101-128.
    Hill, C. W. L., and S. A. Snell. 1988. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research intensive industries. Strategic Management Journal 9: 577-590.
    Hirschey, M., and J. Weygandt. 1985. Amortization policy for advertising and R&D expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research (Spring): 326-335.
    Holmstrom, B. 1989. Agency costs and innovation. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 12: 305-327.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Finance Economics 3: 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., and S. R. Rebuck. 1983. The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-51.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. American Economic Review 76 (May): 323-329.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 1999. Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance 54: 471-517.
    Lawrence, P., and J. Lorsch. 1967. Organization and environment. Boston: Harvard University Press.
    Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107-138.
    Lin, B. W., Y. Lee, and S. C. Hung. 2006. R&D intensity and commercialization orientation effects on financial performance. Journal of Business Research 59(6): 679-685.
    Martin, J. D., J. W. Kensinger, and H. C. Su. 1990. Corporate research and development expenditures and share value. Journal of Financial Economics 26: 255-276.
    Mishkin, F. 1983. A rational expectations approach to macroeconometrics: testing policy effectiveness and efficient markets models. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
    Narian, F., and E. Noma. 1987. Patent as Indicators of Corporate Technology Strength. Research Policy 16: 143-156.
    OECD. 1999. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. Paris: OECD Publications Services.
    Panzar, J. C. 1989. Technological determinants of firm and industry structure. Ch.1 in Handbook of Industrial Organization.
    Patton, A., and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why won`t directors rock the boat? Harvard Business Review 65: 10-15.
    Reyes B. M. 2004. R&D Intensity and financing constraints. Journal of Business and Economic Studies 100(2): 38-53.
    Romijn, H., and M. Albaladejo. 2002. Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy 31: 1053-1067.
    Rosenstein, S., and J. G. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26(2): 175–191.
    Sher, P. J., and P. Y. Yang. 2005. The effects of innovative capabilities and R&D clustering on firm performance: the evidence of Taiwan’s semiconductor industry. Technovation 25: 33-43.
    Shleifer, A., and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance 52(2): 737-783.
    Sougiannis, T. 1994. The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review 69 (January): 44-68.
    Stulz, R. M. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 25-54.
    Stulz, R. M. 1990. Managerial discretion and optimal financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics 26: 3-27.
    Szewczyk, S. H., G. P. Tsetsekos, and Z. Zantout. 1996. The valuation of corporate R&D expenditures: Evidence from investment opportunities and free cash flow. Financial Management 25(1): 105–110.
    Thomsen, S., and T. Pedersen. 2000. Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European Companies, Strategic. Management Journal 21: 689-705.
    Tobin, J. 1969. A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 1 (Feb): 15-29.
    Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics 21: 172–187.
    Villalonga, B., and R. Amit. 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics 80(2): 385–417.
    Xu, M., and C. Zhang. 2004. The explanatory power of R&D for the cross-section of stock returns: Japan 1985–2000. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 12: 245-269.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    100353048
    100
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100353048
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback