English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 94487/125002 (76%)
Visitors : 29710824      Online Users : 414
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59273

    Title: 社會企業資源平台之研究 -以CORPS的觀點
    Research of Social Enterprise Resource Platform –from CORPS model perspective
    Authors: 林郁杰
    Lin, Yu Chieh
    Contributors: 溫肇東
    Wen, Jordan
    Lin, Yu Chieh
    Keywords: 社會企業
    social enterprise
    social enterprise resource platform
    CORPS model
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-09-02 15:34:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 社會企業近年在台灣逐漸受到重視,不僅社會大眾希望其運用商業手段,解決社會問題,許多的企業也希望透過社會企業的概念改造本身組織營運流程,透過解決社會問題,並進而提升品牌形象與消費者認同。台灣公益領域中各樣結合經濟與社會目標之方式,也是希望能夠在重視經濟效益之外達成社會和諧之目的。社會企業資源平台希望快速並有效率的分配資源給社會創業者,媒合機會以及催生社會企業,也成為社會大眾、企業家與願意參與成為志工人士等,萬眾矚目的組織形式與社會風潮。
    In recent years, social enterprises in Taiwan gradually be taken seriously, people wants it to use commercial means to solve social problems. Taiwan's public welfare field of all sorts combination of economic and social goals of the way, also want to attach importance to social cohesion with economic purposes.
    The non-profit organization is already quite mature and scale in Taiwan, with public enthusiasm, willing to participate like industry experts and scholars. Which can be observed from the environment, that social resources accumulated adequacy and energy has been nurtured. And in the use of resources, there is a slowly rise of platform-based organization, which through establish a network to assist the gathering and use of social resources, for "social enterprise resource platform. " Social Enterprise Resource Platform wish to quickly and efficiently allocation of resources to the social entrepreneurs, matchmaking opportunities and spawned social enterprises
    This study was aimed to analyze the past CORPS model, with the emergence of new organizational forms, modified CORPS model for subsequent analysis of the applicability of the model needs changes in response. Fewer emphasis on past model resource exchange process, with some suggestions that emerging patterns of social enterprise organization to help fix CORPS model for the analysis of the applicability of new types of organizations, found its function for the platform features of the connection, and to further explain the social enterprise and social enterprise resource platform contextually, the different levels and relationships.
    Reference: 英文文獻
    1. Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei-Skillern, J., 2006, “Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both?” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 30, 1-22
    2. Burt, R. S, 1992, “Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition’’, Harvard University Press.
    3. Blyer, M. & Coff, R. W., 2003, “Dynamic capabilities, social capital, and rent appropriation: Ties that split pies,” Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, 677-686.
    4. Coleman, J. S., 1990,“Foundations of social theory”, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    5. Cho, A., 2006, “Politics, Values and Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Appraisal.” In Social Entrepreneurship, edited by J. Mair, J. Robinson and K. Hockerts. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
    6. Cohen, A., “The Perfect Store: Inside Ebay’’, Little Brown and Company, 2002.
    7. Dees, J. G., 1998, “The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship,” Comments and Suggestions Contributed from the Social Entrepreneurship Founders Working Group. Durham, NC: Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Fuqua School of Business. Duke University.
    8. Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen,C. M., 2009, “The innovator's DNA,” Harvard Business Review, Vol.87, 60-67.
    9. Dart, Raymond, 2004A,“The legitimacy of social enterprise’’, Nonprofit Management & leadership, 14, 4: 411-424.
    10. Dart, Raymond, 2004B,“Being business-like in a nonprofit organization: A grounded and inductive typology’’. Nonprofit and Voluntary Quarterly.33, 2: 290-310.
    11. Evans D., Schmalensee, R. 2007.“The Catalyst Code: The Strategies Behind the World’s Most Dynamic Companies’’, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    12. Gawer, A, and Cusumano M.A., 2002,“Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation’’, Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
    13. Granovetter, M. 1973,“The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, 1360-1380
    14. Granovetter, M., 1985, “Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol.91, 481-510.
    15. Hodgkinson, Virginia A., Richard W. Lyman and Associates, 1989, “The Future of the Nonprofit Sector: Challenges, Changes and Policy Considerations’’. San Francisco, California: Jossey-Bass.
    16. Hagel, J., & Singer, M.,“Net Worth: Shaping Markets When Customers Make the Rules’’, McKinsey & Company, Inc., 1999.
    17. Kretzmann, P. & McKnight, J.F., 1993, “Building Communities from the Inside out: A Path toward Finding and Mobilizing a Community’s Assets”, published by the Center for Urban Affairs and Policy Research, Northwestern University.
    18. Lin, N., 1999,“Social networks and status attainment”, Annual Review of Sociology: Vol.25, 467-487.
    19. Mair, J. & Marti’, I., 2006, “Social Entrepreneurship Research: A Source of Explanation, Prediction, and Delight”, Journal of World Business, Vol.41, 36-44.
    20. Nasra, R. & Dacin, M. T., 2010, “Institutional Arrangements and International Entrepreneurship: The State as Institutional Entrepreneur”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol.34, 583-609.
    21. OECD, 1999,“Social Enterprises’’, OECD.
    22. OECD, 2001,“Corporate Social Responsibility: Partners for Progress’’. OECD.
    23. Putnam, R. C., 1993,“Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy’’. Princeton: Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
    24. Porter, Michael, 2011.“Creating Shared Value", Harvard Business Review.
    25. Peredo, A. M. and McLean, M., 2006, “Social Entrepreneurship: A Critical Review of the Concept,” Journal of World Business, Vol. 41, 56-65.
    26. Salamon, Lester M., 1999,“American’s Nonprofit Sector’’. New York: Foundation Center.
    27. Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Liden, R. C., 2001,“A Social Capital Theory of Career Success", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44, 291-37.
    28. Stake, R. E., 1995,“The art of case study research’’. CA: Sage
    29. Skocpal T., Finegold, K., 1982. “State Capacity and Economic Intervention in the Early New Deal”. Political Science Quarterly, Vol.97, 255-278.
    30. Wolf, Thomas, 1990,“Managing A Nonprofit Organization’’. New York, New York: Prentice-Hall.
    31. Yang, K., 2007, “Individual social capital and its measurement in social surveys”, Survey Research Methods, Vol.1, 19-27.
    1. 王文華,2012,創業教我的50件事,臺北市,天下遠見出版。
    2. 司徒達賢,1999,非營利組織的經營,天下文化。
    3. 江明修,1998,非營利組織公共服務功能之研究,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    4. 江明修,2002,非營利管理,臺北市,智勝文化。
    5. 吳怡靜,2012,企業下一個競爭優勢:CSV,天下雜誌,509期。
    6. 余佩珊譯,P. Drucker著,1996,非營利機構經營之道,台北,遠流出版。
    7. 周冠州,2010,開放式創新中介平台成功驅動因子研究,國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班資訊管理組碩士論文。
    8. 林典儀,2008,公益創投發展與應用之比較研究,國立台北大學公共行政暨政策學系碩士論文。
    9. 林吉郎,2002,公益創投:非營利組織管理與資源開發新趨勢,台灣非營利組織的產業化經營研討會論文。
    10. 金玉琦,2003,非營利組織資源開發途徑-公益創投與社會企業之可行性研究,南華大學非營利事業管理研究所碩士論文。
    11. 官有垣,2008,社會企業組織在經營管理上的挑戰:以喜憨兒社會福利基金會為案例。兒童及少年福利,第14期,p1-28。
    12. 官有垣,2000,「非營利組織在台灣的發展:兼論政府對財團法人基金會的法令規範」,中國行政評論,10卷 1期:75~110。
    13. 官有垣,2005,「社會企業在經營管理上面臨的挑戰:以台灣喜憨兒社會福利基金會為案例」,發展公益事業建構和諧社會學術研討會,上海:復旦大學社會發展研究中心,2005,Nov. 19~20。
    14. 官有垣、涂瑞德,2000,「企業的社會責任及與第三部門的合作關係」,地方研考電子簡訊,第 4期。
    15. 胡哲生、張子揚、黃浩然,2012,社會創業模式與社會企業資源整合的關聯性,創業管理研究,第七卷第一期,p1~26。
    16. 胡哲生、張子揚,2009,「社會企業創業議題:社會創新與管理融入」,創業管理研究,4卷4期:85~105。
    17. 徐敏雄,1988,創業投資過程之研究,中國文化大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    18. 高明瑞、蔡依倫,2009,鑲嵌的社會創業歷程:制度革新觀點,創業管理研究,第四卷第四期,p107~134。
    19. 陳金貴,2002,非營利組織社會企業化經營探討,新世紀智庫論壇,19期,p39-51。
    20. 陳美菊、李淑麗,2010,全球經濟危機對台灣貿易之影響及對策,經濟研究,第十期,p279-297。
    21. 陳介玄,1998,台灣產業的社會學研究-臺灣研究叢刊,臺北市,聯經。
    22. 陳光亮,2008,台灣非營利組織資訊揭露及稅務申報議題之研究,國立政治大學行政管理碩士學程碩士論文。
    23. 經濟合作暨發展組織,2002,OECD 國際投資暨多國企業宣言與決議:基本條文,經濟部投資業務處。
    24. 鄭勝分,2007,社會企業概念分析,政策研究學報第七期,65-107頁。
    25. 鄭勝分,2005,歐美社會企業發展及其在台灣應用之研究,政治大學公共行政研究所博士論文。
    26. 潘淑滿,2003,質性研究理論與應用。台北:心理。

    1. 蘇金鳳,2012,電子發票難捐 社福團體喊苦,自由時報,2012年2月22日。網路來源:http://www.libertytimes.com.tw/2012/new/feb/22/today-center13.htm,檢索日期:2013/3/10。
    2. 陳靜萍,2013,敲響愛心汽油桶 鼓勵捐發票,中央社,2013/3/23。網路來源:http://www.cna.com.tw/News/aSOC/201303230095-1.aspx,檢索日期:2013/4/22。
    3. HBR網路來源:http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2013/02/the_rise_of_social_entrepreneu.html檢索日期:2013/5/12。
    4. 台灣社會企業創新創業學會,網路來源:http://seietw.blogspot.tw/檢索日期:2013/5/04。
    5. 若水國際官網,網路來源:http://www.flow.org.tw/front/index,檢索日期:2013/5/12。
    6. 耕心蓮苑教育基金會,網路來源:http://www.amtb-gx.org.tw/檢索日期:2013/5/20。
    7. 奇想電子報-跨域連結:專訪社企流總編輯林以涵小姐,網路來源:http://gixianewsletter.wordpress.com/2012/09/27/%E8%B7%A8%E5%9F%9F%E9%80%A3%E7%B5%90%EF%BC%9A%E5%B0%88%E8%A8%AA%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%81%E6%B5%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B7%A8%E8%BC%AF%E6%9E%97%E4%BB%A5%E6%B6%B5%E5%B0%8F%E5%A7%90/,檢索日期:2013/4/27。
    8. 行政院研究發展考核委員會,歷史資料,網路來源:http://www.rdec.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=4548945&ctNode=14637&mp=100,檢索日期:2013/5/20。
    9. 經濟部投資業務處:企業社會責任,網站來源:http://csr.moea.gov.tw/main.aspx,檢索日期:2013/04/30。
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100359022
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    902201.pdf3755KbAdobe PDF659View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback