English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46261791      Online Users : 917
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/59802


    Title: 工業地域廠商研發績效之研究-以生物科技產業為例
    Firms’ R&D performance in industrial district -the case study of biotechnology industry
    Authors: 邱纓喬
    Chiu, Ying Chiao
    Contributors: 邊泰明
    Ben, Tai Ming
    邱纓喬
    Chiu, Ying Chiao
    Keywords: 工業地域
    研發績效
    Industrial district
    R&D performance
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-03 14:48:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在主要的文獻中皆認為工業地域能帶來外部經濟,諸如: 廠商在工業地域中能受益於外部知識以及依賴外部知識的資源、仰賴外部知識的關係,而成為廠商創新的動能。

    據此,我們以生物科技產業作為觀察對象,觀察工業地域廠商研發績效的研究。首先,將台灣劃分為北、中、南三個主要之工業地域,其次以「工業地域」、「產業群聚」、「地理鄰近性」以及「研發網絡」等四項外部性因素觀察在此區域下廠商之研發績效,第三,我們同時分析影響生物科技產業研發績效的內部因素,包括「研發部門」、「員工人數」、「研發人數」以及「研發支出」。

    研究結果顯示,地理鄰近性有利於知識的分享,交互作用在廠商的學習與創新。而我們也發現,產業群聚對生物科技產業之研發績效是很重要的影響因素。除此之外,一般研究所實證的「員工人數」以及「研發人數」對廠商之研發績效有影響,在本研究也得到了一致性的證實,由此顯示豐沛的知識是生物科技產業的核心。最後,我們驗證低研發支出對生物科技產業的研發績效呈現負相關,以及生物科技產業之研發績效在劃分的三個工業地域表現中,無顯著之差異。








    關鍵字:工業地域、研發績效
    The body literature tends to assume that industrial district can increase external economies. For example, all the competitiveness firms in a industrial district can get the benefit from external knowledge. Depending on exteral sources of knowledge and relationships will be the energy of innovation. Accordingly, our research examines the effect of industrial district on the R&D performance of biotechnology industry .
    In this study, first we demarcate three main industrial clustering districts in Taiwan. Second, we observe the R&D performance in the three main industrial clustering districts by four external factors which are industrial district, industry cluster, geographical proximity and R&D network.; and third we also analyze internal factors on the impact of performance of biotechnology industry, which are R&D department, number of employees, R&D personnel and R&D expense.
    Results show that geographical proximity facilitates knowledge sharing and interactive learning and innovation. Moreover, we find that industry cluster is an important factor of R&D performance of biotechnology industry. In addition, the general claim that number of employees and R&D personnel are helpful to firm’s R&D performance. In our research we find the same conclusion, that shows abounding knowledge is the core of the biotechnology industry. Finally, the empirical results indicate that low R&D expense is negatively related to R&D performance, and there is no different performance on Taiwan’s three main industrial clustering districts.




    Keywords:Industrial district, R&D performance
    Reference: 中文文獻
    方世杰,1998,「國內廠商參與科技專案計畫動機之研究」,『中華民國經濟部經濟情勢暨評論季刊』,第四卷第三期。
    朱文儀,1991,「高科技產業從事共同研究發展之實證探討-以資訊電子業為例」,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    何雍慶,1990,「促進中小企業共同研究發展」,經濟部中小企業處。
    吳長駿,2002,研究發展費用、專利權與企業績效之關聯性研究,兼論專利法修法之影響,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    吳濟華,2003 科技廠商創新擴散行為對區域發展影響之研究-都市空間結構空間聚集理論:市場與政
    呂明勳,2008,「地理鄰近性與生產研發網絡之研究-以新竹工業地域為對象」,國立政治大學地政學系碩士論文。
    李仁芳,1993,「研究發展聯盟組織過程管理之研究」,行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告。
    李孟訓、 劉冠男、丁神梅、 林俞君,2007,「我國生物科技產業關鍵成功因素之研究」,『東吳經濟商學學報』,56:27-51.
    周雅雲,2005,影響我國生物科技廠商財務績效之因素,東吳大學經濟學系碩士論文。
    邱皓政,2002,『量化研究與統計分析』,五南圖書出版公司。
    財團法人生物技術開發中心,2009,『台灣生技產業名錄2009』,台北:財團法人生物技術開發中心。
    張盈盈,2000,「台灣中小企業技術取得模式之研究」,銘傳大學國企所未出版碩士論文。
    郭俊男,2004,「研發專案投入對技術產出及財務績效影響之研究-以主導性新產品開發計劃為例」,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    陳協勝、吳濟華、王翔煒 (2008) 科技產業聚集創新之動態外部效果實證研究,管理學報,25 (2):133-149。
    曾俊堯,2003,創新資本對經營績效與公司價值影響之研究,國立台北大學企業管理學系博士論文。
    黃秋梅,2005,「台南地區平面顯示器產業群聚研究」,立德管理學院地區發展及管理研究所碩士論文。
    楊奕泠,2006,「創新環境、網絡與創新成效之研究」,政治大學地政學系碩士班碩士論文。
    經濟部工業局,2008,『台灣生技產業新興生技公司名錄2008』,台北:經濟部工業局。
    經濟部工業局,2010,『2010生技產業白皮書』,台北:經濟部工業局。
    劉代洋、葉勝年,1991,「科技發展計畫追蹤驗證評估模式之研究」,經濟部科技顧問室。
    蔡敦浩,1991,「國際企業策略性結盟與科技移轉-開發中國家的觀點」,1991 年產業科技研究發展管理研討會。
    闕河士、菅瑞昌、黃旭輝,2000,「研究發展密集度與專利對股票績效影響─以臺灣上市公司為例」,『產業管理學報』,1(2):257-268。
    魏克儒,2002,「創新與空間—產研地理鄰近性之探討」,國立台灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文。
    Kim, W. C 等著、應小端譯,2002,『創新』,臺北:天下遠見。
    網頁
    生物技術中心,2010,http://www.cbt.ntu.edu.tw/Service/Biotechnology.htm
    行政院國家科學委員會,2010,http://biotech.nsc.gov.tw/
    孫智麗,2003,「台灣生技產業發展現況與產業創新策略」,台灣經濟研究院,http://www.biotaiwan.org.tw/download/aboutchief2/台灣生技產業現況與創新策略.pdf
    陳協勝、張儀民,2007,地理鄰近性對產品創新影響之研究,2007創新、整合與應用學術研討會,樹德科技大學,http://www.pws.stu.edu.tw/nhikb/research.htm
    製藥工業同業公會網站,http://www.tpma.org.tw/

    英文文獻
    Acs, Z. J., L. Anselin, and A. Varga. ,2002, “Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge,” Research Policy, 31(7):1069-1085.
    Acs, Z., Audretsch, D., Feldman, M.,1994,“ R&D spillovers and recipient firm size,” Rev Econ Stat ,76:336–340
    Aiello, F., & Cardamone, P..,2008, “ R&D spillovers and firms` performance in Italy :Evidence from a flexible production function, ” Empirical Economics, 34(1): 143-166.
    Anderson, G.. 1994, “Industry Clustering for Economic Development,” Economic Development Review, 12(2):26-32.
    Asheim, B. T. ,1999, “ Interactive Learning and Localised Knowledge in Globalising Learning Economies,” GeoJurnal, 49: 345-352.
    Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. ,1996, “ R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production,” American Economic Review, 86(3): 630-640.
    Audretsch, D., & Feldman, M. ,2003, “ Small-firm strategic research partnerships: The case of biotechnology,”Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 15(2): 273-288.
    Audretsch, D.B., Stephan, P.E., 1996, “ Company-scientist locational links:the case of biotechnology,” The American Economic Review ,86:641–652.
    Baptista, R., & Mendonça, J..,2010, “ Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups, ” The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1): 5-29.
    Barak S. Aharonson & Joel A.C. Baumb & Anne Plunket ,2008, “Inventive and uninventive clusters: The case of Canadian biotechnology, ” Research Policy, 37 (6-7): 1108–1131.
    Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., Maskell, P. ,2004, “Clusters and Knowledge: Local Buzz,Global Pipelines and the Process of Knowledge Creation, ” Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31 - 56.
    Becattini, G., 1990, “The Marshallian industrial district as a socioeconomic notion ”, pp.37-51 in Industrial districts and inter-firm co-operation in Italy, edited by Pyke, F., Becattini, G. and Sengenberger, W., Geneva: International Institute for Labor Studies
    Bell, G. G. ,2005, “ Clusters, networks, and firm innovativeness,” Strategic Management Journal, 26(3):287-295.
    Boschma, R. ,2005, “Proximity and Innovation: a Critical Assessment, ” Regional Studies, 39(1): 61-74.
    Boschma, R. A., & Wal, A. L. J. t., 2007, “Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy, Industry & Innovation, ”Taylor and Francis Journals, 14(2):177-199.
    Brown, M. G., Svenson, R. A.,1998, “ Measuring R&D Productivity,” Research Technology Management, 31(4):11-15
    Buckley, P.J. and Ghauri, P.N. ,2004, “ Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises, ”Journal of International Business Studies, 35( 2): 81-98.
    Casper, S., 2007, “ How do technology clusters emerge and become sustainable? Social network formation and inter-firm mobility within the SanDiego biotechnology cluster, ”Research Policy 36: 438–455.
    Chiesa, V. and Toletti, G.,2004, “Network of Collaborations for Innovation:The Case of Biotechnology,”Technology Analysis & Strategic Management,16(1):73-96.
    Cooke, P., Uranga, M. and Etxebarria, G. ,1998, “ Regional systems of innovation: an evolutionary perspective, ”Environment and Planning A, 30 (9): 1563- 1584.
    Cooke, P.,2001, “ Regional innovation systems, clusters and the knowledge economy, ” Industrial and Corporate Change, 10 (4): 945-974.
    Corey E. R., 1997,“Technology Fountainheads: The Management Challenge of R&D Consortia, ”Harvard Business School Press.
    Crépon, B., Duget, E., Mairesse, J., 1998, “Research, Innovation, and Productivity : An Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level, ”Working Paper No. 6696, NBER.
    Cumbers, A., Mackinnon, D. and Chapman, K.,2003, “ Innovation, collaboration, and learning in regional clusters: a study of SMEs in the Aberdeen oil complex, ” Environment and Planning A, 35 (9): 1689-1706.
    Daskalakis and Kauffeld-Monz ,2007, “On the dynamics of knowledge generation and trust building in regional innovation networks. A multi-method approach, ” Papers on agent-based economics.
    De Propris, L., 2005, “Mapping local production systems in the UK: methodology and application, ” Regional Studies, 39(2): 197-211.
    DeCarolis, D., and D. Deeds., 1999, “ The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry, ”Strategic Management Journal, 20 (10): 953-968.
    Dei Ottati, G. ,2002, “Social concertation and local development: the case of industrial district, ” European Planning Studies, 10: 449-66.
    Fontes, M., 2005, “ Distant networking: the knowledge acquisition strategies of ‘out-cluster’ biotechnology firms, ” European Planning Studies ,13: 899–920.
    Fritsch, M., & Kauffeld-monz, M..,2010, “The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: an application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks, ” The Annals of Regional Science, 44(1): 21-38.
    Fritsch, M., & Slavtchev, V.. ,2010, “How does industry specialization affect the efficiency of regional innovation systems? ”,The Annals of Regional Science, 45(1): 87-108.
    Gibson, D. V., and E. M. Rogers., 1994, “ R&D Collaboration on Trial: The Microelectronics and Computer Technology Corporation,” Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    Gilding.,M ,2008, “The tyranny of distance’: Biotechnology networks and clusters in the antipodes, ” Research Policy, 37: 1132–1144
    Griliches, Z., 1990, “Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey, ” Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4): 1661-1707.
    Hagedoorn, J., and M. Cloodt.,2003, “ Measuring innovative performance: is there an advantage in using multiple indicators? ”, Research Policy, 32(8): 1365-1379.
    Harabi, N.,1998, “ Innovation through vertical relations between firms, suppliers and customers: a study of German firms, ” Industry and Innovation, 5 (2): 157-178.
    Harrison, B., 1992, “Industrial districts: old wine in new bottles”, Regional Studies, 26(5): 469-483
    Helsely, R. W., & Strange, W. C.,2002, “ Innovation and input sharing, ” Journal of Urban Economics, 51(1): 22-45.
    Jacobs, J.,1969, “ The economy of cities, ” New York: Vintage.
    Kim C. S. and Inkpen A. C., 2006, “Cross-border R&D Alliance, Absorptive Capacity and Technology Learning, ” Journal of International Management ,11:313-329.
    Kondo, M., 1999, “R&D dynamics of creating patents in the Japanese industry, ” Research Policy, 28(6): 587-600.
    Krugman, P.,1991, “ Increasing returns and economic geography.Journal of Political Economy, ” 99(3): 483–499.
    Lee, M.K. and Lee, M.K., 1992, “ High Technology Consortia: A Panacea for America`s Technological Competitiveness Problems ? ” ,High Technology Law Journal,6(2):335-362.
    Lemarie, S., Mangematin, V., & Torre, A. ,2001, “ Is the creation and development of biotech smes localised? Conclusions drawn from the French case, ” Small Business Economics, 17(1-2): 61-76.
    Love, J. H., Roper, S.,2001,“Location and network effects oninnovation success: evidence for UK, German and Irishmanufacturing plants,” Research Policy, 30(4):643-661.
    Maine, E., Shapiro, D., & Vining, A.,2010, “ The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms, ” Small Business Economics, 34(2): 127-146.
    Malmberg A, Maskell P,2002, “The elusive concept of localization economies: towards a knowledge-based theory of spatial clustering, ” Environ Plan ,34:429-449
    Marques, H.,2005, “The skilled U-shaped Europe: is it really and on which side does it stand?,” Applied Economics, 37(19): 2205-2220.
    Martin, R. and Sunley, P. ,2003, “ Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea?, ” Journal of Economic Geography, 3 (1): 5-35.
    McKelvey, M., Alm, H., Riccaboni, M., 2003, “ Does co-location matter for formal knowledge collaboration in the Swedish biotechnology pharmaceutical sector, ” Research Policy ,32: 483–501.
    Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W.,2004, “ Knowledge networks as channels and conduits: The effects of spillovers in the Boston biotechnology community, ” Organization Science,15(1): 5-21.
    Pakes, A., and Z. Griliches. ,1984, “Patents and R&D at the firm level: the first look”, in R&D, patents, and productivity, ed. Griliches, Z., The University of Chicago Press. Chicago.
    Porter, M. ,2000, “Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy, ” EconomicDevelopment Quarterly, 14(1): 15-34.
    Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., Bowie, J.I., Smith-Doerr, L.,2002, “ The spatial clustering of science and capital: accounting for biotech firm-venture capital relationships, ” Regional Studies, 36: 291–305.
    Powell, W.W., White, D.R., Koput, K.W., Owen-Smith, J., 2005, “Network Dynamics and Field Evolution: The Growth of Interorganizational Collaboration in the Life Sciences, ” American Journal of Sociology ,110:1132–1205.
    Puig, F.&Marques, H. & Ghauri, P.,2009, “Globalization and its impact on operational decisions :The role of industrial districts in the textile industry, ” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(7): 692-719.
    Rees, K., 2005, “ Interregional collaboration and innovation in Vancouver’s emerging high-tech cluster, ”Tijdschrift voor Economische en Social Geografie ,96(3): 298–312.
    Ron Boschma & Anne L. J. ter Wal,, 2007, “Knowledge Networks and Innovative Performance in an Industrial District: The Case of a Footwear District in the South of Italy, ” Industry & Innovation, Taylor and Francis Journals, 14(2): 177-199.
    Rosenthal, S.S., Strange, W.C., 2003, “ Geography, industrial organization,and agglomeration, ” Review of Economics and Statistics, 85:377–393.
    Schumann, P., Ransley, D. and Prestwood, D., 1995, “Measuring R&D Performance, ” Research Technology Management 38(3): 45-54
    Shane S ,2000, “ Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities, ” Organ Sci ,11:448-469
    Acs Z,Audretsch DB, FeldmanM ,1994, “ R&D spillovers and recipient firm size, ” The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2):336-340.
    Shefer, D., Frenkel, A.,1998,“Local milieu and innovation: some empirical results, ”The Annals of Regional Science, 32:185-200.
    Siegel, D. S.,2003, “ Data requirements for assessing the private and social returns to strategic research partnerships: analysis and recommendations, ” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15 (2): 207-225.
    Teece, D. J., 1992, “Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress, ” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization ,18: 1-25.
    Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. ,2005, “Managing Innovation-integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, ”New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
    Uzzi B ,1996, “The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations:the network effect, ” Am Sociol Rev, 61:674-698
    Van der Voort, H.&De Jong, M.,2004, “The Boston Bio-Bang:The emergence of a Regional system of Innovation”, Knowledge, Technology &Policy, 16(4):46-60.
    Waits, M. J. ,2000, “The Added Value of The Industry Cluster Approach to Economic Analysis, Strategy Development, and Service Delivery, ” Economic Development Quarterly, 14( 1):35-51.
    Wennberg, K., & Lindqvist, G.. ,2010, “The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms, ” Small Business Economics, 34(3): 221-241.
    Werner, M. and W. E. Souder,1997, “Measuring R&D Performance, ” State of the Art.Research Technology Management, 40(2): 34-42.
    Zízalová, P.. ,2010, “ Geography of Knowledge-based Collaboration in a Post-communist Country: Specific Experience or Generalized Pattern? , ”European Planning Studies, 18(5): 791.
    Zucker, L. G.,M. R. Darby & M. Brewer,1998, “ Intellectual human capital and the birth of US biotechnology enterprises, ” American Economic Review, 88(1):290-306.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    地政研究所
    95923023
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095923023
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    302301.pdf1345KbAdobe PDF2308View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback