English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23479785      Online Users : 650
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60530


    Title: 產品、網路評論與消費者特質類別對網路口碑效果之影響
    The effect of product, internet comment, and consumer types on eWOM.
    Authors: 施得琪
    Contributors: 邱志聖
    溫偉任

    施得琪
    Keywords: 網路口碑
    公開性與私人性消費產品
    自我意識
    eWOM
    Publicly and Privately Consumed Products
    Self-Consciousness
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-05 16:50:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 針對近年來消費者從被動地由廠商給予到主動搜尋產品資訊的趨勢,本研究欲探討網路口碑效果影響消費者在面對不同種類產品時所產生的認知差異與偏好的改變。
    過去探討網路口碑對消費者的影響往往著重於網路口碑本身的性質,諸如口碑的傳播路徑、口碑所在網站的社群關係或是參考團體的影響力等。然而在網路口碑的傳遞過程當中,除了作為訊號的網路評論之外,還有發訊者:產品及重要的口碑接受者:消費者這兩方。為補足過去研究網路口碑效果的缺陷,本研究希望結合三方的觀點一併探究網路評論的類型、產品類型與消費者類型之間的影響關係,及是否會有任何交互作用的產生。
    研究方法以問卷方式進行,樣本選擇經常上網人口的大宗:大學生為主要受測對象,並以ANOVA及t檢定探討網路口碑對於消費者是否有顯著的影響。大部分的研究假設皆受到支持,總合研究結果如下:
    1. 評論的正負、產品與消費者類別對於消費者產品態度、評論有用度及影響度皆有獨立的顯著影響
    2. 評論的正負、產品與消費者類別等兩兩變數之間甚至是三個變數之間有交互作用產生,而使口碑傳播的結果或有不同。廠商在執行網路行銷活動或面對不同目標市場的消費者時應採取適當的因應辦法,以達到市場有效率的目的。
    The trend of receiving product information given passively by firms has been changed to actively searching the information by consumers. The purpose of this study wants to find out the effects of electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) to differences in consumer’s cognition and preference changes.
    In the past, the research of eWOM always focused on the characteristics of eWOM, like spreading path, the community relationship or the influence of reference groups etc.. However, eWOM not only includes e-comments, but the sender of the comments. To make up the gap of the past researches, this study wants to combine different product categories, types of comments and types of consumers and explore their influences to each other and potential interactions.
    This study distributes questionnaires to frequent internet users: college students and uses ANOVA and t test to examine the regression model. The major findings are as the followings:
    1. Different product categories, comment types and consumer types each have independent influences on consumer’s attitude and cognition.
    2. The interactions effects of different product categories, comment types and consumer types influence the eWOM effect and consumer’s attitude. Firms should select appropriate internet marketing methods corresponding to their target consumers in order to achieve market efficiency.
    Reference: 1. Ahluwalia, R., and B. Shiv. 1997. The effects of negative information in the political and marketing arenas: Exceptions to the negativity effect. Advances in Consumer Research 24:222-222.
    2. Arndt, J. 1967. Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of Marketing research 4 (3):291-295.
    3. Bagozzi, R.P., and T.F. Heatherton. 1994. A general approach to representingmultifaceted personality constructs: Application to state self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling 1 (1):35-67.
    4. Baker, M.J., and G.A. Churchill. 1977. The impact of physically attractive models on advertising evaluations. Journal of Marketing research 14 (4):538-555.
    5. Balasubramanian, S., and V. Mahajan. 2001. The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 5 (3):103-138.
    6. Bart, Y., V. Shankar, F. Sultan, and G.L. Urban. 2005. Are the drivers and role of online trust the same for all web sites and consumers? A large-scale exploratory empirical study. Journal of Marketing 69 (4):133-152.
    7. Bearden, W.O., and M.J. Etzel. 1982. Reference group influence on product and brand purchase decisions. The Journal of Consumer Research 9 (2):183-194.
    8. Becherer, R.C., F.W. Morgan, and L.M. Richard. 1982. The job characteristics of industrial salespersons: Relationship to motivation and satisfaction. The Journal of Marketing 46 (4):125-135.
    9. Belk, R.W. 1988. Possessions and the extended self. Journal of Consumer Research:139-168.
    10. Berger, J., and C. Heath. 2007. Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research 34 (2):121-134.
    11. Bern, D.J. 1972. Self-perception theory. Advances in experimental social psychology 6:1-62.
    12. Bickart, B., and R.M. Schindler. 2001. Internet forums as influential sources of consumer information. Journal of Interactive Marketing 15 (3):31-40.
    13. Blackwell, DR, P.W. Miniard, and J.F. Engel. 2001. Consumer Behavior, Forth Worth. Philadelphia: Harcourt College Publishers.
    14. Bourne, F.S. 1957. Group influence in marketing and public relations. Some applications of behavioral research:208-224.
    15. Bristor, J.M. 1990. Enhanced explanations of word of mouth communications: the power of relationships. Research in consumer behavior 4 (1):51-83.
    16. Brown, Jo, Amanda J. Broderick, and Nick Lee. 2007. Word of mouth communication within online communities: Conceptualizing the online social network. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21 (3):2-20.
    17. Buss, A.H. 1980. Self-consciousness and social anxiety: WH freeman.
    18. Carver, C.S., and M.F. Scheier. 1981. Attention and self-regulation: A control-theory approach to human behavior: Springer-Verlag New York:.
    19. Chen, Y. B., S. Fay, and Q Wang. 2002. Online Consumer Product Reviews: What Can We Learn. Working Paper: University of Florida.
    20. Childers, T.L., and A.R. Rao. 1992. The influence of familial and peer-based reference groups on consumer decisions. The Journal of Consumer Research 19 (2):198-211.
    21. Chiou, J.S., and C. Cheng. 2003. Should a company have message boards on its web sites? Journal of Interactive Marketing 17 (3):50-61.
    22. Cocanougher, A.B., and G.D. Bruce. 1971. Socially distant reference groups and consumer aspirations. Journal of Marketing research 8 (3):379-381.
    23. Cooley, C.H. 1964. Human nature and the social order: Transaction Publishers.
    24. Court, David C., Jonathan W. Gordon, and Jesko Perrey. 2005. Boosting Returns on Marketing Investment. McKinsey Quarterly 2 (May):1-7.
    25. Dichter, E. 1966. How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review 44 (6):147-160.
    26. Diener, E. 1976. Effects of prior destructive behavior, anonymity, and group presence on deindividuation and aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 33 (5):497-507.
    27. Duval, S., and R.A. Wicklund. 1972. A theory of objective self awareness: Academic press Oxford, England:.
    28. Duval, T.S., V.H. Duval, and J.P. Mulilis. 1992. Effects of self-focus, discrepancy between self and standard, and outcome expectancy favorability on the tendency to match self to standard or to withdraw. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 62 (2):340-348.
    29. East, Robert. 2005. The impact of positive and negative word of mouth on brand choice. . In ANZMAC 2005 Conference. Fremantle, Australia.
    30. Ellis, J.B., and G.M. Wittenbaum. 2000. Relationships between self-construal and verbal promotion. Communication Research 27 (6):704.
    31. Engel, J.F., R.D. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard. 1993. Consumer Behavior (8th ed.): Fort Worth: Dryden Press.
    32. Engel, J.F., R.D. Blackwell, and P.W. Miniard. 2001. Consumer Behavior: Orlando Florida: Harcourt Inc.
    33. Feldman, S. 1966. Motivational aspects of attitudinal elements and their place in cognitive interaction. Cognitive consistency: Motivational antecedents and behavioral consequences:75-108.
    34. Fenigstein, A., M.F. Scheier, and A.H. Buss. 1975. Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theory. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 43 (4):522.
    35. Froming, W.J., G.R. Walker, and K.J. Lopyan. 1982. Public and private self-awareness: When personal attitudes conflict with societal expectations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 18 (5):476-487.
    36. Gatignon, Hubert , and Thomas S. Robertson. 1986. An exchange theory model of interpersonal communication. Advances in Consumer Research Vol. 13:Richard J. Lutz, ed., Provo, UT:Association for Consumer Research, 534-538.
    37. Gibbons, F.X. 1990. Self-attention and behavior: A review and theoretical update. Advances in experimental social psychology 23:249-303.
    38. Godes, D., and D. Mayzlin. 2004. Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing Science:545-560.
    39. Goukens, C., S. Dewitte, and L. Warlop. 2009. Me, myself, and my choices: the influence of private self-awareness on choice. Journal of Marketing research 46 (5):682-692.
    40. Gudykunst, W.B., and C.M. Lee. 2003. Assessing the validity of self construal scales. Human Communication Research 29 (2):253-274.
    41. Harrison-Walker, L.J. 2001. E-complaining: a content analysis of an Internet complaint forum. Journal of Services Marketing 15 (5):397-412.
    42. Heider, F. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of psychology 21 (2):107-112.
    43. Heider, F. 1958. The psychology of interpersonal relations.
    44. Hennig-Thurau, Thorsten, Kevin P. Gwinner, Gianfranco Walsh, and Dwayne D. Gremler. 2004. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of Interactive Marketing 18 (1):38-52.
    45. Henricks, Mark 1998. Spread The Word : When your customers talk...people listen. So why aren't more business owners using the cheapest and easiest form of advertising?: Entrepreneur Media, Inc.
    46. Herr, P.M., F.R. Kardes, and J. Kim. 1991. Effects of word-of-mouth and product-attribute information on persuasion: An accessibility-diagnosticity perspective. The Journal of Consumer Research 17 (4):454-462.
    47. Holmes, J.H., and J.D. Lett. 1977. Product sampling and word of mouth. Journal of Advertising Research.
    48. Hovland, C.I., and W. Weiss. 1951. The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15 (4):635.
    49. Hutton, J.G., and F.J. Mulhern. 2002. Marketing communications: Integrated theory, strategy & tactics: Pentagram Pub.
    50. Joinson, AN. 1998. Causes and effects of disinhibition on the Internet. The psychology of the internet:43¡V60.
    51. Joinson, AN. 1999. Social desirability, anonymity, and Internet-based questionnaires. Behavior Research Methods 31 (3):433-438.
    52. Joinson, AN. 2000. Intimacy on-line: Building relationships on the Internet.: British Psychological Society Wessex & Wight Branch Scientific Meeting. University of Bournemouth.
    53. Joinson, AN. 2001. Self disclosure in computer mediated communication: The role of self awareness and visual anonymity. European Journal of Social Psychology 31 (2):177-192.
    54. Jones, S. 2002. The Internet Goes to College: How Students Are Living in the Future with Today.
    55. Kaikati, Andrew M. , and Jack G. Kaikati. 2004. Stealth marketing: How to reach consumers surreptitiously. California Management Review 46:6-22.
    56. Kanouse, D. E., and L.R. Hanson. 1972. Negativity in Evaluations: Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
    57. Kanouse, D.E., and L.R. Hanson. 1987. Negativity in evaluations.
    58. Katz, E., and P.F. Lazarsfeld. 1955. Personal influence: The part played by people in the flow of mass communications: Free Press (Glencoe, Illinois)
    59. Katz, E., and P.F. Lazarsfeld. 1964. Personal influence: The Free Press of Glencoe.
    60. Koffka, Kurt. 1935. Principles of gestalt psychology, International library of psychology, philosophy and scientific method. New York,: Harcourt, Brace and Company.
    61. Kraut, R., M. Patterson, V. Lundmark, S. Kiesler, T. Mukopadhyay, and W. Scherlis. 1998. Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American psychologist 53:1017-1031.
    62. Lampert, S.I., and L.J. Rosenberg. 1975. Word of mouth activity as information search: A reappraisal. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 3 (3):337-354.
    63. Lau, G.T., and S. Ng. 2001. Individual and Situational Factors Influencing Negative Word of Mouth Behaviour. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration 18 (3):163-178.
    64. Levin, I.P., and G.J. Gaeth. 1988. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. Journal of Consumer Research:374-378.
    65. Liu, Y. 2006. Word of mouth for movies: Its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. Journal of Marketing 70 (3):74-89.
    66. Maheswaran, D., and J. Meyers-Levy. 1990. The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing research 27 (3):361-367.
    67. Markus, H.R., and S. Kitayama. 1991. Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological review 98 (2):224.
    68. Matheson, K., and M.P. Zanna. 1988. The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awareness. Computers in Human behavior 4 (3):221-233.
    69. May, Rollo. 1967. Psychology and the human dilemma: New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
    70. Mayzlin, D. 2006. Promotional chat on the Internet. Marketing Science 25 (2):155-163.
    71. Mead, G.H. 1934. Mind, self and society. Chicago, Il.
    72. Meyerowitz, B.E., and S. Chaiken. 1987. The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (3):500.
    73. Moschis, G.P. 1976. Social comparison and informal group influence. Journal of Marketing research 13 (3):237-244.
    74. Nagel, T. 1978. The possibility of altruism: Princeton Univ Pr.
    75. Newcomb, T.M. 1953. An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psychological review 60 (6):393.
    76. Park, C.W., and V.P. Lessig. 1977. Students and housewives: Differences in susceptibility to reference group influence. The Journal of Consumer Research 4 (2):102-110.
    77. Paul, E.F., F.D. Miller Jr, and J. Paul. 1993. Altruism: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [England]; New York.
    78. Ranaweera, C., and J. Prabhu. 2003. On the relative importance of customer satisfaction and trust as determinants of customer retention and positive word of mouth. Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing 12 (1):82-90.
    79. Richins, M.L., and T. Root-Shaffer. 1988. The Role of Evolvement and Opinion Leadership in Consumer Word-of-Mouth: An Implicit Model Made Explicit. Advances in Consumer Research 15:32-36.
    80. Ryan, R.M., and R. Kuczkowski. 1994. The Imaginary Audience, Self Consciousness, and Public Individuation in Adolescence. Journal of Personality 62 (2):219-238.
    81. Samson, A. 2006. Understanding the buzz that matters: negative vs positive word of mouth. International journal of market research 48 (6):647-657.
    82. Scheier, M.F., and C.S. Carver. 1983. Self-directed attention and the comparison of self with standards* 1. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19 (3):205-222.
    83. Schiffman, L. G., and L. L. Kanuk. 1995. Consumer Behavior, 9th Ed.: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    84. Sen, Shahana, and Dawn Lerman. 2007. Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the Web. Journal of Interactive Marketing 21 (4):76-94.
    85. Silverman, G. 1997. How to harness the awesome power of word of mouth. Direct Marketing 60:32-37.
    86. Silvia, P.J. 2002. Self-awareness and the regulation of emotional intensity. Self and Identity 1 (1):3-10.
    87. Skowronski, J.J., and D.E. Carlston. 1987. Social judgment and social memory: The role of cue diagnosticity in negativity, positivity, and extremity biases. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (4):689-699.
    88. Stafford, J.E. 1966. Effects of group influences on consumer brand preferences. Journal of Marketing research 3 (1):68-75.
    89. Sundaram, D.S., K. Mitra, and C. Webster. 1998. Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research 25 (1):527-531.
    90. Tedeschi, B. 1999. Consumer Products Are Being Reviewed on More Web Sites, Some Featuring Comments From Anyone With An Opinion. New York Times, E-Commerce Report, October 25.
    91. Thompson, N. 2003. More Companies Pay Heed to Their "Word of Mouse" Reputation. New York Times, Business/ Financial Desk, June 23

    92. Turner, R.G., L.N. Gilliland, and H.M. Klein. 1981. Self-consciousness, evaluation of physical characteristics, and physical attractiveness. Journal of Research in Personality 15 (2):182-190.
    93. Venkatesan, M. 1966. Experimental study of consumer behavior conformity and independence. Journal of Marketing research 3 (4):384-387.
    94. Wang, A. 2005. The effects of expert and consumer endorsements on audience response. Journal of Advertising Research 45 (04):402-412.
    95. Weinberger, M.G., and W.R. Dillon. 1980. The effects of unfavorable product rating information. Advances in Consumer Research 7 (1):528¡V532.
    96. Weisband, S.P. 1992. Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups* 1. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 53 (3):352-380.
    97. Whyte Jr, W.H. 1954. The web of word of mouth. Fortune 50 (1954):140-143.
    98. Wicklund, R.A. 1975. Objective Self-Awareness1. Advances in experimental social psychology 8:233-275.
    99. Wilson, E.J., and D.L. Sherrell. 1993. Source effects in communication and persuasion research: A meta-analysis of effect size. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 21 (2):101-112.
    100. Witt, R.E. 1969. Informal social group influence on consumer brand choice. Journal of Marketing research 6 (4):473-476.
    101. Witt, R.E., and G.D. Bruce. 1972. Group influence and brand choice congruence. Journal of Marketing research 9 (4):440-443.
    102. Yang, Z., and R. T. Peterson. 2003. I Read About It Online . . .
    103. Zajonc, R.B. 1968. Attitudinal Effects of Mere Exposure1. Pers. Soc. Psycho 9 (2 pt 2).
    104. Zhang, Y., and R. Buda. 1999. Moderating effects of need for cognition on responses to positively versus negatively framed advertising messages. Journal of Advertising:1-15.
    105. 邱恬憶(民99)。網路正負評與消費者產品知識對網路口碑可信度之影響─以開箱文為例。國立政治大學國際經營與貿易學系研究所碩士論文,未出版。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    國際經營與貿易研究所
    98351021
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098351021
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    102101.pdf3809KbAdobe PDF241View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback