English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46298497      Online Users : 1354
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/60631
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/60631


    Title: 國際公司改名對股票市場和借款成本的影響
    Two essays on the benefits and costs of corporate name changes: evidence from stock and loan markets
    Authors: 林曉梅
    Lin, Hsiao Mei
    Contributors: 張元晨
    Chang, Yuan Chen
    林曉梅
    Lin, Hsiao Mei
    Keywords: 公司改名
    借款成本
    石油價格
    Corporate name change
    Cost of bank loans
    Oil price
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2013-09-09 11:28:48 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文包含兩篇文章,分別探討國際市場公司改名對企業股價與借款成本的影響。從本文的實證分析結果得知,國際市場公司改名對公司股票價格與其貸款成本有截然不同的影響。

    Cooper, Dimitrov and Rau (2001)與Cooper et al. (2005)發現當網際網路興盛時,不論公司業務主體是否與網際網路有關,於公司名稱加入與網路有關文字之公司其股價報酬上升且維持一段時間;然而,當網際網路衰弱時,將公司名稱刪除網路字樣之公司,其股價出現顯著異常報酬,使得股東財富增加。鑒於近年來國際石油價格急遽上升,之後又逢美國次級房貸風暴因而暴跌,國際石油價格的波動走勢提供本文第一篇文章之研究動機。本文第一篇文章的研究目的在於探討當國際石油價格持續上升時,國際市場公司是否傾向變更其公司名稱,將其公司名稱加入「石油」或「原油」等相關之文字,透過公司名稱的變更提高企業價值;而當國際石油價格急速下降時,國際市場公司是否反而傾向將其公司名稱刪除「石油」或「原油」等相關之文字,以防止股價下跌。此外,由於美國與加拿大地理位置與文化相近,過去文獻常將兩者作比較。顧此,本文進一步探討美國公司與加拿大公司更名對企業股價的影響是否有顯著地差異。

    本文發現當國際石油價格上漲時,美國公司傾向將其公司名稱加入「石油」或「原油」等相關之文字且其股價報酬上升,企業價值增加。然而,當美國次級房貸風暴時期,投資人深恐石油產業將受美國次級房貸危機影響,因此變更公司名稱之公司其股價下跌。另外,本文發現由於近年來加拿大為世界主要石油輸出國之一,投資人對石油產業公司的了解度較佳,因此美國與加拿大公司更名對企業股價有不同的影響。

    過去文獻主要以股東角度探討公司更名議題,本文第二篇文章主要從銀行貸款者的角度來探討公司更名的影響。本文認為公司更名提高貸款者與借款者之間的資訊不對稱,增加銀行貸款者評估借款者未來還款能力的不確定性。為了要降低不確定性帶來的財務風險,銀行貸款者傾向提高借款利息或增加要求抵押擔保品。本文發現在公司更名後,公司須負擔較高的借款成本、較多的抵押品擔保與合約限制。此外,公司更名後,願意加入聯合貸款的銀行數目降低。

    這些實證結果支持本文的推論。在股票市場上,公司變更公司名稱對企業價值有顯著地影響,管理階層藉由變更公司名稱影響投資人對其的看法(investor sentiment),進而提高股票價值。然而,在借貸市場上,公司變更名稱提高公司與貸款者間之資訊不對稱,公司更名須償付較高的借款成本和較多的抵押品擔保。本文的實證結果說明金融機構對公司治理具有監督和管理的重要角色。
    Two essays are comprised in this dissertation to examine the benefits and costs of corporate name changes. The empirical investigation on corporate name changes in stock market and loan market provide the entirely different insights on the effect of corporate name changes.
    With the recent oil price in surge and then crash, I have the opportunity to examine whether firms have the incentives to changes their names when oil price surge. In the first essay, I examine the wealth effect of corporate name changes involving oil-related terms. Following Cooper, Dimitrov and Rau (2001) and Cooper et al. (2005), I argue that firms tend to change their name by adding the words “oil” or “petroleum” to names when oil price in surge, while deleting the words “oil” or “petroleum” to names when oil price in a crash. I also compare the effect of corporate name changes between U.S. and Canadian stock market. Consistent with the prediction, I provide the evidence that there exists valuation effect of corporate name changes involving oil-related terms in U.S. stock market when the recent oil price surge. When financial crisis exploded U.S. stock market reacts significant negatively to corporate name changes. This is perhaps because investors expect economic difficulty caused by the financial crisis, which in turn, would hurt the oil industry and high oil price is not expected to be sustainable. On the contrary, relative to U.S. market, Canadian stock market has little reaction on the corporate name changes regardless of the type of name changes or market condition. This opposite results can be attributed to the different economic structure between U.S. and Canadian market.
    In the second essay, I focus on the effect of corporate name changes from the perspective of bank loan holders. I examine the cost of corporate name changes in the loan contracting. A corporate name changes creates information asymmetry and uncertainty about the future cash flow of a firms. To reduce the increase of credit risk, bank loan holders would attempt to enhance the efficient monitoring by tighter contracting terms and more concentrated lending structure. Consistent with this argument, the empirical results show that loan after name changes have significantly higher loan spread, higher probability of being secured, more general covenant restrictions and fewer lenders participate in a syndicated loan.
    Following Wu (2010), I categorize corporate name changes into different types of name changes and examine whether there is different effect among different types of name changes. I find that firms experiencing radical name changes are more likely to bear more financing costs. Lastly, I provide the evidence that firms pay higher borrowing costs when investors experience a significantly positive reaction from stock market through cosmetic name changes, which illustrate the importance of banks playing the role of monitoring and controlling borrowers.
    Reference: Almazan, A., Banerji, S., Motta, A.D., 2008, Attracting Attention: Cheap Managerial Talk and Costly Market Monitoring, Journal of Finance 63, 1399-1436.

    Altman, E.I., 1968, Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy, Journal of Finance 23, 589–609.

    Andrikopoulos, P., A. Daynes and P. Pagas, 2007, The Long-Term Market Performance of UK Companies Following Corporate Name Changes, Working Paper University of Portsmouth.

    Bae, K.-H. and W. Wang, 2009, What’s in a “China” Name? A Test of Investor Sentiment Hypothesis, Working Paper York University, Schulich School of Business.

    Barclay, M.J., Smith, C.W., 1995, The maturity structure of corporate debt, Journal of Finance 50, 609–631.

    Bennett, Amanda, 1986, November 17, Firms Grapple to Find New Names as Images and Industries Change, Wall Street Journal 1.

    Berger, A.N., Espinosa-Vega, M.A., Frame, W.S., Miller, N.H., 2005, Debt maturity, risk, and asymmetric information, Journal of Finance 60, 2895–2923.

    Bharath, S.T., Dahiya, S., Saunders, A., Srinivasan, A., 2008, Lending Relationships and Loan Contract Terms, working paper.

    Bosch, J.C., and M. Hirschey, 1989, The Valuation Effects of Corporate Name Changes, Financial Management 18, 64-73.

    Bradley, M., Roberts, M.R., 2005, The structure and pricing of corporate debt covenants, working paper.

    Cooper Michael J., Orlin Dimitrov, and P. Raghavendra Rau, 2001, A rose.com by any other name, Journal of Finance 56, 2371– 2388.

    Cooper Michael J., Igor Osobov, Ajay Khorana, and Ajay Patel, 2005, Managerial actions in response to a downturn: Valuation effects of name changes in the dot.com decline, Journal of Corporate Finance 11, 319–335.

    Cooper Michael J., Gulen Huseyin, and P. Raghavendra Rau, 2005, Changing names with style: mutual fund name changes and their effects on fund flows, Journal of Finance 60, 2825-2858.

    Diamond, D.W., 1991, Debt maturity structure and liquidity risk, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 709–737.

    Diamond, D.W., Verrecchia, R.E., 1991, Disclosure, liquidity, and the cost of capital, Journal of Finance 46, 1325–1359.

    Easley, D., O’Hara, M., 2004, Information and the cost of capital, Journal of Finance 59, 1553–1583.

    Fama, E., 1985, What`s different about banks?, Journal of Monetary Economics 15, 29-39.

    Ferris, S.P., 1988, The Effect of Corporate Name Changes on Shareholder Wealth, Journal of Applied Business Research 4, 40-49.

    Foerster, Stephen R., and G. Andrew Karolyi, 1993, International Listing of Stocks: The Case of Canada and the U.S., Journal of International Business Studies, 24, 763-784.

    Foerster, Stephen R., and G. Andrew Karolyi, 1998, Multimarket Trading and Liquidity: A Transaction Data Analysis of Canada U.S. Interlisting, Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 8, 393-412,

    Freixas, X., Rochet, J., 2008, Microeconomics of Banking, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. Second edition.

    Göttner and Limbach, 2011, Fine Feathers Make Fine Birds? Wealth Effects and the Choice between Major and Minor Corporate Name Changes, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology working paper

    Graham, John R, Li Si, and Qui Jiaping, 2008, Corporate misreporting and bank loan restatement, Journal of Financial Economics 89, 44-61.

    Guedes, J., Opler, T., 1996, The determinants of the maturity of corporate debt issues, Journal of Finance 51, 1809–1834.

    Hoberg, G. and Phillips, G., 2010, Dynamic Text-Based Industry Classifications and Endogeneous Product Differentiation, University of Maryland working paper

    Horsky D, Swyngedouw P., 1987, Does it pay to change your company’s name? A Stock market perspective, Marketing Science 6, 320-335.

    Howe John S., 1982, A Rose by any Other Name? A Note on Corporate Name Changes, The Financial Review 17, 271-278.

    Jimenez, G., Salas, V., Saurina, J., 2006, Determinants of collateral, Journal of Financial Economics 81, 255–281.

    Josev, T., C. Howard and R. Faff, 2004, What’s in a Name? Evidence on Corporate Name Changes from the Australian Capital Market, Pacific Accounting Review 16, 57-76.

    Karbhari, Y., Z. Sori and S. Mohamad, 2004, Shareholder Wealth Effects and Corporate Name Changes: Evidence from Malaysia, Corporate Ownership and Control 2, 38-49.

    Karolyi G. Andrew, 1995, A Multivariate GARCH Model of International Transmissions of Stock Returns and Volatility: The Case of the United States and Canada, Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 13, 11-25.

    Karpoff, Jonathan M., and Graeme Rankine, 1994, In Search of a Signaling effect: The Wealth Effects of Corporate Name Changes, Journal of Banking and Finance 18, 1027-1045.

    Kilian Lutz and Park Cheolbeom, 2008, The Impact of Oil Price Shocks on the U.S. Stock Market, Center for Economic Policy Research working paper.

    Kilic, C. and T. Dursun, 2006, The Effect of Corporate Identity Changes on Firm Value: An Empirical Investigation, Journal of the American Academy of Business 10, 234-240.

    Koku, P.S., 1997, Corporate Name Change Signaling in the Services Industry, Journal of Services Marketing, 11, 392-408.

    Lee, P.M., 2001, What’s in A Name.com?: the Effects of ‘.com’ Name Changes on Stock prices And trading Activity, Strategic Management Journal 22:793-804.

    Lee, S.W., Mullineaux, D.J., 2004, Monitoring, financial distress, and the structure of commercial lending syndicates, Financial Management 33, 107–130.

    Leland, H.E., David H. P., 1977, Informational Asymmetries, financial structure, and financial intermediation, Journal of Finance 32, 371-387.

    Liu, Y., 2010, The Valuation Effect of Corporate Name Changes: A 30-Year Perspective, European Journal of Management, Forthcoming.

    Mase, B., 2009, The Impact of Name Changes on Company Value, Managerial Finance 35,316-324.

    Mazumdar, S.C., Sengupta, P., 2005, Disclosure and the loan spread on private debt, Financial Analysts Journal 61, 83–95.

    McQuade, W., 1984, Cosmetic Surgery for the Company Name, Fortune Magazine, April 30, 1984.

    Myers, S.C., Majluf, N.S., 1984, Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have, Journal of Financial Economics 13, 187-221.

    Ongena, S., Smith, D.C., 2001, The duration of bank relationships, Journal of Financial Economics 61, 449–475.

    Rajan, R., Winton, A., 1995, Covenants and collateral as incentives to monitor, Journal of Finance 50, 1113–1146.

    Spence, M., 1973, Job Market Signaling, Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 355-374.

    Stuart, Helen and Laurent Muzellac, 2004, Corporate Makeovers: Can a Hyena Be Rebranded?, Journal of Brand Management, 11, 472-82.

    Sufi, A., 2007, Information asymmetry and financing arrangements: evidence from syndicated loans, Journal of Finance 62, 629–668.

    Tadelis, S. 1999, What’s in a Name? Reputation as a Tradable Asset, American Economic Review, 89, 548-563.

    Treadwell, D.F., 2003, Can Your Institution’s Name Influence Constituent Response? An Initial Assessment of Consumer Response to College Names, Public Relations Review 29, 185–197.

    Wu Y., 2010, What`s in a name? What leads a firm to change its name and what the
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    96357506
    99
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096357506
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    750601.pdf573KbAdobe PDF2211View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback