English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46309098      Online Users : 1208
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/61206
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/61206


    Title: Form 20-F調節表對分析師盈餘預測之影響
    The effect of Form 20-F reconcilations on analysts` earnings forecasts
    Authors: 吳建宏
    Contributors: 林美花
    吳建宏
    Keywords: Form 20-F
    分析師盈餘預測
    國際會計準則
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2013-10-01 13:49:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究探討在美發行存託憑證之外國公司(ADR公司)採用不同會計準則編製財務報表,對於分析師盈餘預測之影響;以及美國證券交易委員會(SEC)於2007年11月15日免除採用國際會計準則之ADR公司編製Form 20-F調節表規定,對於分析師盈餘預測之影響。針對主題一實證結果顯示,相較於外國公司所屬國家之會計準則,國際會計準則(IFRS)與美國一般公認會計原則(US GAAP)在提供資訊能力上較佳,有助於分析師之盈餘預測;然而進一步的實證則顯示IFRS與US GAAP間在提供資訊能力上並無明顯差異。此外,研究發現當外國公司之所屬國家為法制力較高的國家時,較有助於分析師之盈餘預測。針對主題二實證結果,本研究實證結果支持SEC對於免除採IFRS公司編製Form 20-F調節表的預期,並未發現任何證據顯示SEC免除ADR公司編製Form 20-F調節表,對於分析師進行盈餘預測時會有資訊遺失(information loss)的現象,本文實證結果亦顯示對於分析師而言IFRS與US GAAP所編製的財務報表可以提供類似的資訊。
    Reference: 一、網站
    國際會計準則網頁,2013,IFRS組織架構。網址:http://www.ifrs.org/The-organisation/Documents/2013/Who-We-Are-English-2013.pdf。
    二、文獻
    汪進揚,2004,財務分析師盈餘預測誤差與盈餘預測行為影響因素之研究,證券市場發展季刊,第16卷第4期:117-144。
    林有志,2007,會計準則差異之資訊性:以亞洲四小龍在美國發行存託憑證公司為例,逢甲大學會計學系碩士班碩士論文。
    楊佳茹,2011,美國證管會新制對盈餘品質之影響,國立中正大學會計與資訊科技研究所碩士論文。
    蔡東廷,2011,美國證管會刪除揭露調整項規定後,對在美國上市且採用國際會計準則之外國公司的價值攸關性之影響,國立臺灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    林育正,2010,我國IFRS導入之市場反應,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    Abarbanell, J. S., and B. J. Bushee. 1997. Fundamental analysis, future earnings, and stock prices. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (Spring): 1-24.
    Armstrong, C. S., M. E. Barth, A. D. Jagolinzer, and E. J. Riedl. 2012. Market reaction to the adoption of IFRS in Europe. Working Paper, University of Pennsylvania.
    Ashbaugh, H. 2001. Non-U.S. firms’ accounting standard choices. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 20: 129-153.
    Ashbaugh, H., and M. Pincus. 2001. Domestic accounting standards, international accounting standards, and predictability of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (December): 417-434.
    Bae, K.-H., H. Tan, and M. Welker. 2008. International GAAP differences: The impact on foreign analysts. The Accounting Review 83 (May): 593-628.
    Baker, H. K., J. R. Nofsinger, and D. G. Weaver. 2002. International cross-listing and visibility. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 37 (September): 495-521.
    Ball, R., A. Robin, and J. S. Wu. 2003. Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (March): 235-270.
    Barron, O. E., O. Kim, S. C. Lim, and D. E. Stevens. 1998. Using analysts` forecasts to measure properties of analysts` information. The Accounting Review 73 (October): 421-433.
    Barron, O. E., and P. S. Stuerke. 1998. Dispersion in analysts` earnings forecasts as a measure of uncertainty. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance 13 (Summer): 245-270.
    Barth, M. E., W. R. Landsman, and M. H. Lang. 2008. International accounting standards and Accounting Quality. Journal of Accounting Research 46 (June): 467-498.
    Bartov, E., D. Givoly, and C. Hayn. 2002. The rewards to meeting or beating earnings expectations. Journal of Accounting & Economics 33 (June): 173-204.
    Basu, S., L. Hwang, and C. Jan. 1998. Internationsl variation in accounting measurement rules and analysts` earnings forecast errors. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 25 (December): 1207-1247.
    Bhushan, R. 1989. Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (July): 255-274.
    Byard, D., Y. Li, and Y. Yu. 2011. The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts`information environment. Journal of Accounting Research 49 (March): 69-96.
    Chen, L. H., S. Deng, P. P. Gupta, and H. Sami. 2012. The SEC`s elimination of 20-F reconciliation and the cost of debt. Working Paper, Villanova School of Business, College of Business, and Lehigh University.
    Chen, L. H., and H. Sami. 2009. Trading volume reaction to the earnings reconciliation from IFRS to U.S. GAAP : Further evidence. Working Paper, Arizona State University and Lehigh University.
    Das, S., C. B. Levine, and K. Sivaramakrishnan. 1998. Earnings predictability and bias in analysts` earnings forecasts. The Accounting Review 73 (April): 277-294.
    Daske, H., L. Hail, C. Leuz, and R. S. Verdi. 2011. Mandatory IFRS reporting around the world: Early evidence on the economic consequences. Working Paper, University of Mannheim.
    Defond, M. L., and J. Jiambalvo. 1994. Debt convenant violation and manipulation of accruals. Journal of Accounting & Economics 17 (January): 145-176.
    Easterwood, J. C., and S. R. Nutt. 1999. Inefficiency in analysts` earnings forecasts: Systematic misreaction or systematic optimism? The Journal of Finance 54 (February): 1777-1797.
    Ernstberger, J., S. Krotter, and C. Stadler. 2008. Analysts forecast accuracy in Germany:The effect of different accounting principles and changes of accounting principles. Business Research 1 (May): 26-53.
    Fanto, J. A., and R. S. Karmel. 1997. A report on the attitudes of foreign companies regarding a U.S. listing. Stanford Journal of Law, Business and Finance 3 (Summer): 51-83.
    Francis, J., and D. Philbrick. 1993. Analysts` decisions as products of a multi-task environment. Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 216-230.
    Gordon, E. A., B. N. Jorgensen, and C. L. Linthicum. 2010. Could IFRS replace us gaap? A comparison of earnings attributes and informativeness in the US market. Working Paper, Temple University, Columbia University, and University of Texas-San Antonio.
    Guan, Y., O.-K. Hopeb, and T. Kang. 2006. Does similarity of local GAAP to U.S. GAAP explain analysts`forecast. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics 2 (December): 151-169.
    Hansen, T. B., G. Pownall, R. Prakash, and M. Vulcheva. 2011. Relaxing the reconciliation requirement in Non-U.S. firms` SEC filings: Changes in GAAP, earnings attributes, and earnings informativeness. Rochester, Rochester.
    Harris, M. S., and K. A. Muller. 1999. The market valuation of IAS versus US-GAAP accounting measures using Form 20-F reconciliations. Journal of Accounting & Economics 26 (January): 285-312.
    Hayn, C. 1995. The information content of losses. Journal of accounting and Economics 20 (September): 125-153.
    Henry, E., S. Lin, and Y.-W. Yang. 2009. The European-U.S. "GAAP Gap": IFRS to U.S. GAAP form 20-F reconciliations. Accounting Horizons 23 (June): 121-150.
    Hope, O.-K. 2003. Disclosure practices, enforcement of accounting standards, and analysts` forecast accuracy: An international study. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (May): 235-272.
    Hora, J. A., R. H. Tondkar, and R. A. Mcewen. 2003. Effect of foreign GAAP earnings and Form 20-F reconcilations on revisions of analysts` forecasts. The International Journal of Accounting 38: 71-93.
    Hutton, A. P. 2005. Determinants of managerial earnings guidance prior to regulation fair disclosure and bias in analysts` earnings forecasts. Contemporary Accounting Research 22 (Winter): 867-914.
    Jiambalvo, J. 1996. Discussion of "Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC". Contemporary Accounting Research 13 (Spring): 37-47.
    Jiang, J., K. R. Petroni, and I. Wang. 2010. Did eliminating the 20-F reconciliation between IFRS and US GAAP matter? Working Paper. Rochester, Rochester.
    Kang, T., G. V. Krishnan, M. C. Wolfe, and H. S. Yi. 2012. The Impact of eliminating the 20-F reconciliation requirement for IFRS filers on earnings persistence and information uncertainty. Accounting Horizons 26 (December): 741-765.
    Kasznik, R., and M. F. Mcnichols. 2002. Does meeting earnings expectations matter? Evidence from analyst forecast revisions and share prices. Journal of Accounting Research 40 (August): 727-759.
    Kim, Y., H. Li, and S. Li. 2012. Does eliminating the Form 20-F reconciliation from IFRS to US GAAP have capital market consequences? Journal of Accounting & Economics 53: 249-270.
    Kross, W., B. Ro, and D. Schroeder. 1990. Earnings expectation: The analysts` information advantage. Accounting Review 65 (December ): 461-476.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-De-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2006. What works in securities laws? The Journal of Finance 61 (February): 1-32.
    Lang, M. H., K. V. Lins, D. P. Miller, and C. Leuz. 2003. ADRs, analysts, and accuracy: Does cross listing in the United States improve a firm`s information environment and inrease market value? Journal of Accounting Research 41 (May): 317-345.
    Lang, M. H., and R. J. Lundholm. 1996. Corporate disclosure policy and analyst behavior. The Accounting Review 71 (October): 467-492.
    Lang, M. H., J. S. Raedy, and W. M. Wilson. 2006. Earnings management and cross listing: Are reconciled earnings comparable to US earnings? Journal of Accounting and Economics 42 (October): 255-283.
    Leuz, C. 2003. IAS versus U.S. GAAP: information asymmetry–based evidence from Germany`s new market. Journal of Accounting Research 41 (June): 445–472.
    Leuz, C. 2005. Cross listing, bonding and firms` reporting incentives: A discussion of Lang, Raedy and Wilson (JAE 2006). Journal of Accounting & Economics 42 (October): 285–299.
    Leuz, C. 2010. Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research 40: 229-256.
    Linda Smith, B., and S. C. Youngsoon. 1998. Discretionary management earnings forecast disclosures: Antecedents and outcomes associated with forecast venue and forecast specificity choices. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Autumn): 167-190.
    Lindberg, D., and D. Seifert. 2010. A new paradigm of reporting: The basics of international financial reporting standards. CPA Journal 80 (January): 36-39.
    Matsumoto, D. A. 2002. Management`s incentives to avoid negative earnings surprises. The Accounting Review 77: 483-514.
    Merton, R. C. 1987. A Simple Model of Capital Market Equilibrium with Incomplete Information. The Journal of Finance 42: 483-510.
    Tan, H., S. Wang, and M. Welker. 2011. Analyst following and forecast accuracy after mandated IFRS adoptions. Journal of Accounting Research 49 (December): 1307-1357.
    Williams, P. A. 1996. The relation between a prior earnings forecast by management and analyst response to a current management forecast. The Accounting Review 71 (January): 103-115.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    100353030
    101
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0100353030
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback