English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46291132      Online Users : 1462
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62011


    Title: 台灣民眾選制知識之研究
    Citizen`s Electoral Knowledge in Taiwan
    Authors: 王丞玄
    Wang, Cheng Hsuan
    Contributors: 游清鑫
    王丞玄
    Wang, Cheng Hsuan
    Keywords: 複數選區單記非讓渡投票制
    單一選區兩票並立制
    事實性知識
    概念性知識
    分裂投票
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2013-12-02 17:49:08 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   台灣在2005年通過修憲,將過去立委選舉所採用的「複數選區單記非讓渡投票制」改為「單一選區兩票並立制」,並於2008年第七屆立委選舉首度實施。有關民眾對新選制的知識以及選制知識如何影響其投票參與行為遂逐漸引起學界的關注。然而過去國內相關研究對於民眾選制知識的測量都只聚焦於新選制的制度成分(事實性選制知識),並沒有進一步探索民眾對這些制度成分可能帶來的政治影響的瞭解程度(概念性選制知識)。基於這樣的認識,本文嘗試延續現有為數不多的選制知識文獻,進一步延伸討論民眾對於不同類型選制知識的認知情形,一方面除了釐清事實性與概念性選制知識兩者之間的相關性以及各自的影響因素之外,另一方面則試圖探討不同類型的選制知識與選民分裂投票的關聯性。
      
      在經驗資料的研究結果上我們發現,事實性與概念性選制知識之間的關係為低度的正相關;民眾的教育程度、性別、年齡、對2012年選舉的關注程度、政治新聞接觸的頻率等,皆是同時影響民眾事實性與概念性選制知識的相同變數;此外,2008年立委選舉有沒有去投票此變數只與民眾的事實性選制知識達到統計上顯著的正相關,而政黨認同強度也只會影響民眾概念性選制知識的高低。在分裂投票的研究結果方面,事實性而非概念性選制知識才是影響因素。
      
      本文以初探性的角度出發,期許透過本文的發現,使得相關研究學者能注意到概念性(選制)知識的重要性,往後不僅只是注意事實性(選制)知識的內涵,未來更要深入瞭解概念性知識在激發、引導及合理化民眾政治評價及政治行為的可能性。同時在檢討與建議部分,本文也討論了概念性知識測量的困難,可能造成分析上的不足,這也是未來研究民眾選制知識,或是一般政治知識時所必須克服的挑戰。
    Reference: 一、中文部分

    王業立,2008,《比較選舉制度》,台北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
    林瓊珠,2005,〈台灣民眾的政治知識〉,《選舉研究》,12(1): 147-172。
    王嵩音,2006,〈網路使用與選舉參與之研究―以2004年立法委員選舉為例〉,《台灣民主季刊》,3(4):71-102。
    吳重禮,2008,〈政黨偏好、制衡認知與分裂投票—2006年北高市長暨議員選舉的實證分析〉,《臺灣民主季刊》,5(2): 27-58。
    林聰吉、王淑華,2007,〈台灣民眾政治知識的變遷與來源〉,《東吳政治學報》,25(3): 93-129。
    胡佛,1998,《政治學的科學研究(三):政治參與與選舉行為》,台北:三民書局。
    孫秀蕙,1995,〈比較台灣省民傳統媒體與新媒體的使用對政治行為的影響〉,《選舉研究》,2 (1): 93-118。
    --------,1996,〈選民的傳播型態對政治行為的影響:以1996年總統大選為例〉
    《選舉研究》,3(3): 71-105。
    翁秀琪、孫秀蕙,1994,〈選民的媒介使用行為及其政治知識、政黨偏好與投票行為之間的關聯〉,《選舉研究》,1(2): 1-25。
    黃秀端,1996,〈政治知識之認知與性別差異〉,《東吳政治學報》,5: 27-50。
    游清鑫,2004,〈分裂投票解釋觀點與台灣選舉之應用:以2002年高雄市長與市
    議員選舉為例〉,《台灣政治學刊》,8(1): 47-98。
    ---------,2006,〈單一選區兩票制:成份與政治影響〉,載於《台灣法學新課題》,社團法人台灣法學會主編,台北:元照出版社。
    ---------,2012a,《台灣民眾立法委員新選舉制度知識之研究》,計畫編號:NSC 100-2410-H-004-090-MY2,台北:行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
    ---------,2012b,〈初體驗與粗體驗:台灣民眾對立委新選制的認知、參與及評價〉,《選舉研究》,19(1): 1-32。
    張卿卿,2002,〈競選媒體使用對選民競選議題知識與政治效能感的影響-以兩千年台灣總統大選為例〉,《選舉研究》,9(1): 1-39.
    崔曉倩、吳重禮,2011,〈年齡與選舉參與:2008 年總統選舉的實證分析〉,《調查研究—方法與應用》,26: 7-44。
    傅恆德,2005,〈政治知識、政治評價與投票選擇:第五屆立法委員選舉研究〉,《選舉研究》,12(1): 39-68。
    蕭怡靖、黃紀,2010,〈單一選區兩票制下的一致與分裂投票—2008年立法委員選舉的探討〉,《台灣民主季刊》,7(3): 1-43。
    蕭怡靖,2012,〈民眾對立法委員選舉之政黨不分區名單的認知與影響:以2008年立法委員選舉為例〉,《選舉研究》,19(1): 33-67。

    二、外文部分

    Abramson, Paul R. 1983. Political Attitudes in American: Formation and Change. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company Press.
    Bennet, Stephen E. 1989. “Trends in Americans’ Political Information,1967-1987.” American Politics Quarterly 17(4):422-435.
    --------. 1995. “Comparing Americans’ Political Information in 1988 and 1992.” Journal of Politics 57(2): 521-532.
    Banducci, Susan, Jeffrey Karp, and Jack Vowles. 1998. “Vote Splitting under MMP.” In Voters’ Victory? New Zealand’s First Election under Proportional Representation, eds. Jack Vowles, Peter Aimer, Susan Banducci, and Jeffrey Karp. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
    Chaffee, Steven H., and Stacey Frank Kanihan. 1997. “Learning about Politics from Mass Media.” Political Communication 14(4):421-430.
    Cho, Youngho. 2012. “How well ordinary citizens understand democracy: the case of the South Korean electorate.” http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2012.734808 (accessed Aug 13, 2013).
    Delli-Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Ketter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Heaven: Yale University Press.
    Eveland, W. P., J. Cortese, H. Park, and S. Dunwoody. 2004. “How Web Site Organization Influences Free Recall, Factual Knowledge, and Knowledge Structure Density.” Human Communication Research 30(2): 208-233.
    Frazer, Elizabeth, and Kenneth Macdonald. 2003. “Sex Difference in Political Knowledge in Britain.” Political Studies 51(1): 67-83.
    Garand, James C., and Marci Glascock Lichtl. 2000. “Explaining Divided Government in the United States: Testing An Intentional Model of Split-Ticket Voting.” British Journal of Political Science 30(1): 173-91.
    Galston, William A. 2001 “Political Knowledge, Political Engagement, and Civic Education.” Annual Review of Political Science 4(1): 217-234.
    Gronlund, Kimmo. 2003. “Knowledge and Turnout: A Comparative Analysis.” Presented at second ECPR General Conference, Marburg Germany.
    Gronlund, Kimmo, and Henry Millner. 2006. “The Determinants of Political Knowledge in Comparative Perspective.” Scandinavian Political Studies 29(4): 386-406.
    Hayes, Barnadette C. 2001. “Gender, Scientific Knowledge, and Attitudes toward the Environment: a Cross-National Analysis.” Political Research Quartly 54(3): 657-671.
    Howe, Paul. 2006. “Political Knowledge and Electoral Participation in the Netherlands: Comparisons with the Canadian Case.” International Political Science Review 27(2): 137-166.
    Huang, Chi, Ching-hsin Yu, and Yi-ching Hsiao. 2011. “Citizens’ Awareness of the New MMM Electoral System in Taiwan: A Cohort Analysis.” Election Studies 1(2): 7-43.
    Huang, Chi, Hung-chung Wang, and Chang-chih Lin. 2012. “Knowledge of the Electoral System and Voter Turnout.” Taiwanese Political Science Review 16(1): 239-279.
    Jennings, M. Kent. 1996. “Political Knowledge over Time and across Generations.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 60(2): 228-252.
    Karp, Jeffrey A., Jack Vowles, Susan A. Banducci, and Todd Donovan. 2002. “Strategic Voting, Party Activity, and Candidate Effects: Testing Explanations for Split Voting in New Zealand’s New Mixed System.” Electoral Studies 21(1): 1-22.
    Karp, Jeffrey A. 2006. “Political Knowledge about Electoral Rules: Comparing Mixed Member Proportional Systems in Germany and New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 25(4): 714-730.
    Lambert, Ronald D., James E. Curtis, Barry J. Kay, and Steven D. Brown. 1988.
    “The Social Sources of Political Knowledge.” Canadian Journal of Political
    Science 21(2): 359-374.
    Luskin, Robert C. 1990. “Explaining Political Sophistication.” Political Behavior 12(4): 331-361.
    Long, J. Scott, 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Advanced Quantitative Techniques in the Social Sciences Series Number 7. SAGE Publication: Thousand Oaks, CA.
    Lassen, David D. 2005. “The Effect of Information on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1):103-118.
    Larcinese, Valentino. 2007. “Does Political Knowledge Increase Turnout? Evidence from the 1997 British General Election.” Public Choice 131(3): 387-411.
    Martinez M., and J. Gill. 2006. “Does Turnout Decline Matter? Electoral Turnout and Partisan Choice in the 1997 Canadian Federal Election.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 39(2): 343-362.
    Neuman, Russell. 1986. The Paradox of Mass Politics: Knowledge and Opinion in the American Electorate. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.
    Pattie, C., and R. Johnson. 2003. “Civic Literacy and Falling Electoral Turnout: the United Kindom 1992-1997.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 36(3): 579-599.
    Robinson, John P., and Mark Levy. 1986. The Main Source: Learning From Television News. Beverly Hill:Sage.
    Robinson, John P., and Dennis K. Davis. 1990. “Television News and the Informed Public: An Information-Processing Approach.” Journal of Communication 40(3): 106-119.
    Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1987. Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Boston : Unwin Paperbacks.
    Thompson, Dennis F. 1970. The Democratic Citizen. London: Cambridge University Press.
    Wattenberg, Martin, Ian McAllister, and Anthony Salvanto. 2000. “How Voting is Like Taking a SAT Test – an Analysis of American Voter Rolloff.” American Politics Quarterly 28(2): 234-250.
    Williams, Richard. 2006. “Generalized Ordered Logit/ Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables.” The Stata Journal 6(1):58-82.
    Vowles, Jack, Peter Aimer, Helena Catt, Jim Lamare, and Raymond Miller. 1995. Towards Consensus? The 1993 Election in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
    Vowles, Jack. 1998. “Countdown to MMP.” In Voters’ Victory? New Zealand’s First Election under Proportional Representation, eds. Jack Vowles, Peter Aimer, Susan Banducci, and Jeffrey Karp. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
    Vowles, Jack, Jeffrey Karp, Susan Banducci, and Peter Aime. 2002. “Public Opinion, Public Knowledge, and the Electoral System.” In Proportional Representation on Trials: The 1999 New Zealand General Election and the Fate of MMP, eds. Jack Vowles, Peter Aimer, Jeffrey Karp, Susan Banducci, Raymond Miller, and Ann Sullivan. Auckland: Auckland University Press.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    98252016
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0098252016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    201601.pdf733KbAdobe PDF2340View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback