English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110119/141062 (78%)
Visitors : 46490297      Online Users : 943
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 新聞學系 > 會議論文 >  Item 140.119/62750
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62750


    Title: 口述歷史真偽論爭之迷思─由溫哈熊被控誹謗案看起
    Other Titles: The myth of the debates on factuality of oral history
    Authors: 李郁青
    Li, Yu-Ching
    Contributors: 國立政治大學
    新聞研究所
    Keywords: 口述歷史;方法論;文本有效性;後現代;社會建構
    methodology;oral history;post-modern;social construction of reality;text validity
    Date: 2004
    Issue Date: 2013-12-19 14:29:24 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自古以來,無論中外,凡涉及史料蒐集問題,口述訪談經常是不可或缺的重要採集法。然而,口述歷史非歷史定論,其突破傳統一家之言,主張由個人角度出發理解與詮釋歷史,有別於傳統歷史之觀點。本文認為,若欲解決口述歷史文本有效性之問題,僅憑藉「多方查證」等科學方法,仍是一種符合客觀性意理、旨於維護單一文本權威性之傳統思維。本文主張,我們或許應由「使讀者了解口述史方法具有主觀性」來著手。
    This article asserts that history is merely the representation of the past, but not equal to the real past. And the perspective of oral history is not meant to be the historical last word. However, it focuses on the individual perspective to the past, and lets everybody have his own perspective on recognizing the past. In other words, the worldview of oral history is different to the traditional view of history. This article believes that it`s hard to resolve the problem of text authority and validity of oral history only through the scientific method (ex: cross-checking). This article believes that it is feasible to pursue the text validity of oral history by letting readers understand the subjectivity of oral history in its methodology.
    Relation: 中華傳播學會年會研討會
    Data Type: conference
    Appears in Collections:[新聞學系] 會議論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    231_1.pdf342KbAdobe PDF2579View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback