English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46253738      Online Users : 990
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/62830
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62830


    Title: 關於上帝之知的哲學論述-與佛智的比較研究
    Other Titles: Philosophical Discourses on Scientia Dei-A Comparative Study with Buddha`s Wisdom
    Authors: 沈清松
    Shen, Vincent
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 上帝之知;佛智;比較宗教哲學;聖多瑪斯;亞里斯多德;敘事性
    Scientia Dei;Buddha`s Wisdom;Comparative Philosophy of Religion;St. Thomas;Aristotle;Narrativity
    Date: 2009.07
    Issue Date: 2013-12-20 17:46:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 關於上帝之知的討論,與人對上帝的認知雖然有別,但仍屬密切相關。本文所言的上帝之知,雖與人對上帝的認知有關,但並非針對中世紀聖伯爾納(Bernard of Clairvaux)所謂「世俗之知」(scientia mundi)與「上帝之知」(scientia Dei)的區分;本文將僅就上帝本身的知識或智慧進行哲學的討論。首先,本文將從比較做起,主要有關佛教所謂佛智,以及西方哲學家例如亞里斯多德、聖多瑪斯、黑格爾等人有關神、上帝之知、絕對精神的論述,尤其是聖多瑪斯關於上帝之知的論述,進行比較,並歸納出他們都著重的全面與圓滿的自覺,與對萬物兼普遍與個別之知。然後,本文將進一步討論上帝之知是否含有敘事的成分,也就是上帝對於發生在個人與群體身上的故事或可能發生、實際發生與想像建構的故事的認知。總之,拙作至多僅能視為管窺之見。既為管窺,則屬有限,應可破管以顯天地之大;既為論述,則應可解構,以顯造物者之無窮。
    The discussion of "Scientia Dei (God`s knowledge)" is very much related to, though still different from, the question "Quomodo Deus a nobis cognoscatur (How do we know God)." This paper deals with Scientia Dei, not in the sense it is distinguished from Scientia Mundi by St Bernard of Clairvaux, but in the sense it is related to all philosophical discourses on the wisdom of God Himself. The first step of this paper is a comparative study with "Buddha`s Wisdom" taught by some major Mahayana Buddhist Schools, and the ideas of God, God`s Knowledge and Absolute Spirit in Aristotle, St. Thomas and Hegel, in particular St. Thomas` discussion of "Scientia Dei." The result of this comparison is their common emphasis on God`s total and complete transparent self-understanding, and His universal and concrete knowledge of all things. After this, we will move on to discuss the narrative component of Scientia Dei, to see whether in God`s knowledge there is a place for the historical and imaginative stories of all social groups and individuals, of their inexhaustible possibilities, developments and constructions, both descriptive and imaginative. Anyhow, this essay is limited to a comparative and discursive study, without any ground in the author`s religious experience with God`s knowledge. Therefore it should be deconstructed once it is pronounced, erased once it is written.
    Relation: 哲學與文化月刊, 36(7), 95-113
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    95-113.pdf953KbAdobe PDF2573View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback