English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25746108      Online Users : 114
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/62838
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62838


    Title: 論慎到政治哲學中的公共性
    Other Titles: The notion of 'Publicity' in Shen Dao's Political Philosophy
    Authors: 沈清松
    Shen, Vincent
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 公共性;慎道;道法關係;政治哲學;;;無為
    Publicity;Shen Dao;Daoism-Legalism Relation;Political philosophy;Law;Power;Statecraft
    Date: 2004.06
    Issue Date: 2013-12-20 17:51:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 慎到是最早期的稜下先生,由於他對社會生活與政治生 活中的「公共性」的考量,使他由道家存有論、宇宙論和修養論, 轉出法家的政治哲學與法律哲學。他是由老莊道家轉往黃老道家, 由道家轉出法家的關鍵性人物。基本上,慎到重視社會與政治生活 中的「公」的層面及其客觀化建構,一方面保留了道家對自然的客 觀規律的認識,但另方面也重視法的人為建構及其變遷。對於「公 共性」的考量,貫穿了慎到對於「勢」、「法」、「術」的看法。 值得注意的是,慎到並不是一個嚴苛的法家。慎到雖強調法,但認 為法不宜僵硬;他雖強調勢,也就是權力的運用,但不喜權力的傲 慢;他雖討論「無為J 以之為君臣關係之術,但他不喜秘密的權 諜,沒有後來法家那般玩弄權術;這些主要是由於他以政治社會為 實現公共性的領域。
    Shen Dao was among the earliest Jixia scholars, who, because of his concern of the “publicity" in social and political realms, moved from Daoist ontology, cosmology and spirituality to Legalist political philosophy. He should be seen as the crucial figure in the transition from the development of the Daosim of Laozi and Zhuangzi to the Huanglao Daoism and from Daoism to Legalism. Basically, Shen Dao put emphasis on the public aspect of social and political Iives and its objective construction, in keeping the idea of regularity of natural law in Daoism and the artificial construction of law and its process of becoming. The idea of publicity penetrated all his philosophy of Law, Power and statecraft. He was not a severe legalist, not allowing law to be stringent, power to be arrogant and statecraft to be machiavellian, all because of his concern with publicity, objectivity and justice.
    Relation: 哲學與文化, 31(6), 5-22
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    5-22(3).pdf7261KbAdobe PDF684View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback