English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25838130      Online Users : 132
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/62844
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/62844


    Title: 休閒與自由:在科技產品與多元他者網絡中的論述
    Other Titles: Freedom and Leisure in the Networks of Technological Objects and Many Others
    Authors: 沈清松
    Shen, Vincent
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 自由;休閒;工作;科技;多元他者;網絡;生命實踐
    Leisure;Freedom;Work;Technical Objects;Many Others;Networks;Life-Praxis
    Date: 2010.09
    Issue Date: 2013-12-20 17:52:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文首先從對比哲學的觀點,指陳人的存在既是自由的又是相關的:人的自由是在關係中的自由,人的關係是在自由中的關係。然而,今天人是在日新月異的科技和全球化所形塑的科技產品和多元他者網絡之中發展其自由與關係。對我而言,若無自由便無休閒可言,即便是浮生半日、慵懶無事,若心中無自由,也不能得到悠閒。本文試圖分析工作與休閒的關係,超越古代希臘社會與近代紀律社會所假定的工作與休閒的二元對立,並探問一個更為平衡的觀點,用以重新界定人性。我將自由、安逸、創造與悅樂四者視為是休閒中的存在狀態。據此,我們將討論今日那些由於抑制自由的商業化與機械化歷程所帶來的休閒生活的危機。本文將重新詮釋道家進技於道的藝術精神與自由觀,藉著道家哲學的一些想法,啟發今天的人類,如何在動態關係的存有論之中思考並探詢自由,並透過生命實踐的藝術,實現自由的人生。
    From my philosophy of contrast, I understand human being today as both free and related, in the networks of multiple others and technical objects developed by science/technology and the process of globalization. For me, without freedom there is no leisure. By the mediation of technical objects today, human desire tends to develop in various networks of multiple others in order to gain its own freedom. This paper will analyse the relation between work and leisure, attempting to go beyond the presupposed dichotomy of work/leisure in both modern "disciplined society" and ancient Greek society, and to look for a more balanced view of their relation in redefining the nature of human being. This understanding will allow us to proceed to characterize the state of being in leisure as freedom, being-at-ease, creativity and joyfulness. An attempt will be made to characterize the crisis of today's leisure life in reference to its commercialization and mechanicalization. Also, we will try to obtain some inspirations from Daoist philosophy as to the idea of freedom in the dynamic ontology of relationship with the Daoist art of life-praxis.
    Relation: 哲學與文化月刊, 37(9), 91-104
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    91-104(2).pdf1069KbAdobe PDF709View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback