English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88987/118697 (75%)
Visitors : 23574624      Online Users : 133
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/63824

    Title: 紮根理論與質性研究:調和觀點
    Other Titles: Grounded Theory in Qualitative Research: A Reconciliatory Perspective
    Authors: 賽明成;陳建維
    Contributors: 國貿系
    Keywords: 紮根理論;方法論;譯碼典範;情境/結果矩陣
    grounded theory;methodological grounds;coding paradigm;conditional/consequential matrix
    Date: 2010-03
    Issue Date: 2014-02-13 11:57:17 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 長久以來,質性研究遭受過於主觀與不夠嚴謹的批評。紮根理論因應這樣的氛圍而生,紮根理論之研究途徑企圖藉由發展系統性的分析模式以理解「過程」、「情境」及「行動」等概念,並對上述批判作出反駁。然而,因為Strauss與Corbin兩位原作者在論述上的衝突,開啟了一連串對於概念性與方法論上的爭辯與困惑。因此,本文企圖重新審視紮根理論的不同途徑以便釐清其認識論上的矛盾。同時,本文建議以不同「情境」作為驅動個人行動的主要論述,以便對「譯碼典範」作出修正。最後,我們對Strauss與Corbin的「條件/結果矩陣」作出修正並提出新的矩陣分析模式,以解釋不同「情境」、「行動」及「分析層級」彼此的連結與互動。
    Qualitative research has been criticized for the lack of objectivity and scientific rigor. In response to such criticism, grounded theory emerged as a philosophical and analytical approach to studying the process, action, and context of social phenomena. Nevertheless, the controversy between Strauss and Corbin, the founders of grounded theory, has provoked never-ending academic debates. Confusions are inevitably derived respectively from both theoretical foundations and methodological applications. This research is to clarify the epistemological ambivalence involved in the use of grounded theory. It intends to reconcile the seemingly conflicting viewpoints of different grounded theory schools by revisiting diverse philosophical positions of these schools and revising the "coding paradigm" for analyzing the contexts that drive human actions. Accordingly, a new "conditional/consequential matrix", as opposed to Strauss and Corbin's, is proposed to explain the connections and interactions among various contexts, actions, and micro-mess-macro levels of analysis, helping us generate propositions and build theories.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 49(1), 1-28
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際經營與貿易學系 ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    49 1 128.pdf3058KbAdobe PDF950View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback