English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46287530      Online Users : 795
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65096


    Title: 立法委員選區服務之持續與變遷:第三屆至第八屆之分析
    The Continuity and Change of the Legislators` Constituency Service: The Analysis of the Third to the Seventh Legislative Yuan
    Authors: 張正蒓
    Contributors: 盛杏湲
    張正蒓
    Keywords: 選區服務
    代表行為
    選制改革
    代表角色
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-04-01 11:20:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 自第七屆立法院起,立委選舉制度由SNTV改為SMD,這個巨大的轉變勢必會對於立法委員的代表行為與選區經營模式造成影響,以往以小眾為訴求或是憑藉高知名度當選的立法委員,要在新的選舉制度下求取連任,將面臨地方政治人物的挑戰。這些地方政治人物長期深耕基層,擁有深厚地方實力,對於立法委員的連任具有極大的威脅性。因此,立法委員若要尋求連任,勢必得在代表角色的取捨以及選區經營方式上有所改變,才能符合選區民眾對於立法委員的要求與期待。

    本研究以第三至第八屆區域立委為研究對象,在研究方法上使用調查研究法、參與觀察以及深入訪談法三種方式,藉由多元的資料蒐集方式,透過立法委員本人及其周遭助理的實際經驗,試圖拼湊、還原立法委員在新舊選制之下,選區經營模式的持續與變遷。

    在代表角色的取捨上,新舊選制之下的立法委員雖然在服務處的數量上變化不大,但是新選制下的立委顯然投入較多的時間與人力在經營選區;另一方面,在立法問政時,新選制下的立委也更加重視選區的意見,並且以選區的利益為優先考量。當政黨與選區在議題上意見不一致時,立委會傾向扮演兩者之間溝通、磨合的角色,並且避免在媒體上發言。

    此外,在選區認知方面,新選制下的立委為了在選區獲得過半數的選票,會加強鞏固連任選區,甚至會積極的加以擴大,因此,立委在選區經營模式上也與以往顯得有所不同。在選區行程方面,立委會花費更多的時間在親自參與選區活動,以紅白帖行程為例,新選制下的立委面對選民的婚喪喜慶時,其處理的態度較舊選制下的立委更加積極。而在服務案件的處理上,立委轉介給其他民意代表處理的情形,在新選制之下逐漸減少,而且服務案件的內容及件數都較以往更為龐雜,而有立委「里長化」的現象,這是立法委員為爭取連任而導致的結果。
    Reference: 參考書目

    一、中文部分

    文崇一、蕭新煌,1988,《中國人:觀念與行為》,台北:巨流出版社。
    王業立,2007,《比較選舉制度》,台北:五南出版社。
    王靖興,2009,〈立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析:2000年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷〉,《台灣政治學刊》,13(2): 113-169。
    任凱、王佳煌譯,2005,John Lofland and Lyn H. Lofland著,《質性研究方法─社會情境的觀察與分析》,台北:學富文化事業有限公司
    李美華、孔明祥、李明寰、林嘉娟、王婷玉、李承宇譯,2004,Earl Babbie著,《社會科學研究方法》,台北:時英出版社。
    吳振嘉,2003,〈選舉制度變革的影響因素 : 以日本、台灣為例〉,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
    高世垣,2001,〈選區服務與個人選票的建立〉,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
    高偉綸,2011,〈區域與不分區立委代表行為之差異〉,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
    許志鴻,1986,〈選區選民對議員角色行為的影響力之探討-台北市議會第四屆議員之研究〉,國立政治大學政治研究所碩士論文。
    盛杏湲,1999,〈立法問政與選區服務:第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討〉,《選舉研究》,6(2):89-120。
    盛杏湲,2000,〈政黨或選區?立法委員的代表取向與行為〉,《選舉研究》,7(2): 37-70。
    盛杏湲,2003,〈立法機關與行政機關在立法過程中的影響力:一致政府與分立政府的比較〉,《台灣政治學刊》,7(2): 51-105。
    盛杏湲,2004,《代表與代表制度: 從臺灣民眾與立法委員的觀點來探析》,NSC93-2414-H-004-004。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會。
    盛杏湲,2005,〈選區代表與集體代表:立法委員的代表角色〉,《東吳政治學報》,21: 1-40。
    盛杏湲,2009,〈選制改革前後立委提案的持續與變遷〉,台灣政治學會年會暨「動盪年代中的政治學:理論與實踐」學術研討會,2009年11月,台北。《台灣政治學會》,1-35。
    盛杏湲,2013,〈再探選區服務與立法問政:選制改革前後的比較〉,「國會與政府體制」學術研討會,2013年5月,台北:東吳大學。
    盛杏湲、黃士豪,2006,〈臺灣民眾為什麼討厭立法院?〉,《台灣民主季刊》,3(3): 85-127。
    盛治仁,2006,〈單一選區兩票制對未來臺灣政黨政治發展之可能影響探討〉,《台灣民主季刊》,3(2): 63-85。
    張福建,1998,〈議會及議員的權責:愛德蒙‧柏克(E. Burke)代表理念的可能貢獻及其限制〉,《行政學報》,29: 133-150。
    張福建、劉義周,2002,〈代表的理論與實際〉,《政治與社會哲學評論》,1(June): 117-149。
    陳學文、羅清俊,2012,〈影響臺灣民眾重分配政策偏好的因素〉,《人文及社會科學集刊》,24(3): 367-397。
    黃光國,1988,《人情與面子:中國人的權力與遊戲》,台北:巨流出版社。
    黃秀端,1994,《選區服務:立法委員心目中的連任基礎》,台北:唐山出版社。
    黃紀,2008,〈緒論:選舉制度的脈絡與效應〉,載於《如何評估選制變遷:方
    法論的探討》黃紀、游清鑫主編,台北:五南出版社,頁1-18。
    游清鑫,2008,〈如何評估選區重劃的政治效果〉,載於《如何評估選制變遷:
    方法論的探討》黃紀、游清鑫主編,台北:五南出版社,頁21-48。
    潘明宏、陳志瑋譯,2003,C. Frankfort-Nachmias and David Nachmias著,《最
    新會科學研究方法》,台北:韋伯文化。
    蔡佳泓,1996,〈立法委員的選民服務之個案研究〉,國立政治大學政治研究
    所碩士論文。
    羅清俊,2008,〈小規模立法委員選區的分配政治-選民對於補助利益的期待〉,《台灣民主季刊》,5(4): 47-85。
    羅清俊、廖健良,2009,〈選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行爲的影響〉,《台灣政治學刊》,13(1): 3-53。
    羅清俊、詹富堯,2012,〈立法委員特殊利益提案與中央政府計畫型補助款的分配:從民國94年至98年之資料探析〉,《公共行政學報》,42: 1-31。

    二、英文部分

    Adler E. Scott. 2002. Why Congressional Reforms Fail: Reelection and the House Committee System. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
    Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress.” The Journal of Politics 57(2): 324-343.
    Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Heaven and
    London: Yale University Press.
    Batto, Nathan F. 2005. “Electoral Strategy, Committee Membership, and Rent Seeking in the Taiwanese Legislature, 1992-2001.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (1): 43-62.
    Burke, Edmund. 1969. The Representative as Trustee. In Hanna F. Pitkin, ed.
    Representation: 157-176. New York: Atherton Press.
    Burke, Edmund. 1987. The Political Philosophy of Edmund Burke, edited by Ian Hampsher-Monk, London: Lonman.
    Cain, Bruce E., John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. 1984. “The Constituency Service
    Basis of the Personal Vote for U.S. Representatives and British Members of
    Parliament.” American Political Science Review 78:110-125.
    Cain, Bruce E., John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. 1990. The Personal Vote:
    Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Harvard University Press.
    Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. “Incentive to Cultivate a Personal Vote: a Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14: 419-439.
    Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Cox, Gary W. and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Crisp, Brain F., Maria C. Escobar-Lemmon, Bradford S. Jones, Mark P. Jones, and Michelle M. Taylor-Robinson. 2004. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” The Journal of Politics 66(3): 823-846.
    Crowe, Edward. 1986. “The Web of Authority: Party Loyalty and Social Control in the British House of Commons.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11(2): 16-186.
    Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps. 1977. “The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness. “ Legislative Studies Quarterly 2(3): 233-245.
    Evans, Diana. 2004. Greasing the Wheels: Using Pork Barrel Project to Build
    Majority Coalition in Congress. Cambridge University Press.
    Fenno, Richard. 1973. Congress in Committees. Boston:Little, Brown, and
    Company.
    Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in There Districts. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
    Fiorina, M. P. 1980. “The Decline of Collective Responsibility in American Politics.” Daedalus 109: 24-45.
    Fiorina, M. P. 1989. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Heitshusen, Valerie. 2005. “Electoral Context and MP Constituency Focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom.” American Journal of Political Science 4(1): 32-45.
    Hirano, Shigeo. 2006. “Electoral Institutions, Hometowns, and Favored Minorities: Evidence from Japanese Electoral Reforms.” World Politics 58: 51-82.
    King, Gary. 1991. “Constituency Service and Incumbency Advantage.” British Journal of Political Science 21(1): 119-128.
    Kingdon, John W. 1989. Congressmen’s Voting Decisions. 3rd ed. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company.
    Lancaster, Thomas D. 1986. “Electoral Structures and Pork Barrel Politics.” International Political Science Review 7(1): 67-81.
    Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case Studies, and Political Theory.” World Politics 16: 677-715.
    Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Heaven and
    London: Yale University Press.
    Mayhew, David. 1987. “The Electoral Connection and the Congress.” In McCubbins, Mathew D. and Terry Sullivan. Eds. Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    Miller, Warren and Donald Stokes. 1963. “Constituency Influence in Congress.” The
    American Political Science Review 56: 43-56.
    Parker, David C. W., and Craig Goodman. 2009. “Making Good Impression: Resource Allocation, Home Style, and Washington Work.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(4): 493-524.
    Park, Glenn R. 1986. Homeward Bound: Explaining Changes in Congressional Behavior. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
    Park, Glenn R. 1989. “The Role of Constituent Trust in Congressional Elections.”
    Public Opinion Quarterly 52: 175-196.
    Pitkin, H. F. ed. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Ramseyer, J. Mark, and Frances McCall Rosenbluth. 1993. Japan’s Political Marketplace. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
    Scheiner, Ethan. 2006. “Clientelism in Japan: the Importance and Limits of Institutional Explanations.” Patrons, Clients, and Policies : Patterns of Democratic Accountability and PoliticalCcompetition. Cambridge, UK ; New York : Cambridge University Press.
    Sheng, S.Y. 2006. “ The Personal Vote-Seeking and the Initiation of Particularistic
    Benefit Bills in the Taiwanese Legislature.” Legislatures and Parliaments in the
    21st Century Conference, Taipei.
    Yiannakis, Diana Evans. 1981. “The Grateful Electorate: Casework and
    Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 25:568-580.
    Yu, Ching-hsin. 2007. “Competitiveness and Redistricting: A Preliminary Review of
    Taiwan’s 2007 Redistricting.” Presented at the International Symposium on Mixed Election Systems in East Asia. Taipei: Election Study Center of National Chengchi University.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    政治研究所
    97252002
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097252002
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200201.pdf769KbAdobe PDF2410View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback