政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/65348
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46198169      Online Users : 595
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/65348


    Title: 台灣地方法院管理效率之探討：三階段資料包絡分析法之應用
    Other Titles: A Study of Efficiency of District Courts in Taiwan: A Three-Stage DEA Approach
    Authors: 王國樑;張美玲;陳麗雪
    Wang,Kuo-Liang;Chang,Mei-Lin;Chen,Li-Hsueh
    Contributors: 經濟系
    Keywords: 技術效率;三階段資料包絡分析法;隨機邊界分析法
    Technical Efficiency;Three-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis;Stochastic Frontier Analysis
    Date: 2009-10
    Issue Date: 2014-04-14 17:38:59 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 利用1997至2006年台灣地方法院資料，本文首先以DEA評估個別法院的管理效率，然後將無效率部份透過SFA分離出外在因素與統計干擾對無效率的影響，最後再評估調整後的管理效率。未考量與考量外在因素與統計干擾的管理效率評估結果皆顯示，各法院間存在顯著性差異，且多數法院的管理效率仍有改善空間。SFA估計結果顯示，法官占法院全體員工人數比率、通常訴訟占訴訟案件比率及人口數對民事與刑事管理效率皆有正向影響，但法院規模對民事與刑事管理效率有負向影響；而辦案維持率與折服率對民事管理效率有負向影響，但對刑事管理效率卻有正向影響。調整前、後的各項效率評估值間皆存在顯著差異；雖然逐年增加經費與人員，法院管理效率似乎尚未顯現改善趨勢。
    Based on the data of Taiwan`s district courts during the period of 1997-2006, this paper uses the three-stage DEA to assess technical efficiency of district courts. First, DEA is applied to obtain initial measure of efficiency without taking output quality, district courts` and environmental characteristics into account and, then, SFA is used to investigate and adjust district courts` outputs for the impacts of external variables and statistical noise. Finally, the adjusted data is used to re-evaluate technical efficiency. The empirical results before and after the adjustment all show that the differences among district courts` efficiency mearsures are significant and there exists an ample space for most of them to improve their efficiency. The results of SFA show that, for both civil and criminal cases, the ratio of judges to total employees, the ratio of regular proceeding cases to civil and criminal action cases and the population of jurisdiction have positive impacts on efficiency, while district court`s size has a negative influence on efficiency. The affirmed rate and subduing rate have negative influences on efficiency of civil cases, while they have positive impacts on efficiency of criminal cases. Technical efficiency, pure technical efficiency and scale efficiency measures at the stage three are significantly different from those at the stage one. The efficiency of Taiwan`s district courts has not been improved although their budgets and numbers of employees have been increased.
    Relation: 管理學報,26(5),559-576
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Economics] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    559576.pdf263KbAdobe PDF2885View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback