English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91287/121427 (75%)
Visitors : 25450340      Online Users : 241
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/66452

    Title: 由動詞及UP或DOWN組成之動詞片語與介系詞片語連用之分析
    Analysis of the co-occurrence of the VP-UP/DOWN construction and the P-NP construction
    Authors: 李旻倩
    Contributors: 鍾曉芳
    Keywords: BNC英國國家語料庫
    two co-occurring prepositions
    semantic meaning analysis
    verb-preposition sequence
    prepositional phase
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-06-04 14:39:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去許多研究著眼於探討英文介系詞的語意,其中許多學者專注在單一介系詞的探討(e.g., Boers, 1996; Lindstromberg, 2010),其它學者則分析由動詞與介系詞組成之動詞片語、由介系詞與名詞組成之介系詞片語的語意(e.g. Larsen-Freeman & Celce-Murcia, 1999; Lindner, 1983; Quirk, Greenbaum, Leech, & Svartik, 1985)。過去這些研究大多在單一介系詞的框架下進行,鮮少有包含雙介系詞的句構的研究。本論文所研究之句構為:一個由動詞及UP/DOWN組成之動詞片語加上一個由IN與名詞組成之介系詞片語,在本句構中包含兩個連用之介系詞,本研究的分析包含雙介系詞的語意、動詞片語以及介系詞片語的語意,另外還包含此句構中所有語意的語意關連。
    Reference: Alam, Y. S. (2004, May). Decision trees for sense disambiguation of prepositions: Case of over. In Proceedings of the HLT-NAACL Workshop on Computational Lexical Semantics, pp. 52-59. Association for Computational Linguistics.
    Arnold, L.V. (1986). The English Word. Moscow: Viszsaja Skola.
    Ayano, S. (2004). The layered internal structure of spatial PPs. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 18(1), 3-27.
    Baldwin, T., Beavers, J., Van Der Beek, L., Bond, F., Flickinger, D., & Sag, I. A. (2006). In search of a systematic treatment of determinerless PPs. In Syntax and Semantics of Prepositions (pp. 163-179). Springer Netherlands.
    Baldwin, T., & Villavicencio, A. (2002,). Extracting the unextractable: A case study on verb-particles. In proceedings of the 6th conference on Natural language learning-Volume 20, pp. 1-7. Association for Computational Linguistics.
    Berez, A. L., & Gries, S. T. (2008). In defense of corpus-based methods: a behavioral profile analysis of polysemous get in English. In Proceedings of the 24th Northwest linguistics conference. University of Washington working papers in linguistics.Vol. 27, pp. 157-166.
    Boers, F. (1996). Spatial Prepositions and Metaphor: A Cognitive Semantic Journey Along the Up-down and the Front-back Dimensions: Narr.
    Brugman, C.M. (1988). The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics, and the Structure of the Lexicon. Taylor & Francis.
    Chung, S.F., & Lee, M.C. (2013). Focusing on the Literal and Metaphorical Patterns of Prepositions: Corpus and its Applications. Paper presented at the The Fifth Asian Conference on Education (ACE 2013), Osaka, Japan.
    Darwin, C. M, & Gray, L.S. (1999). Going After the Phrasal Verb: An Alternative Approach to Classification. TESOL Quarterly, 33(1), 65-83. doi: 10.2307/3588191
    Daud, N. M, & Abusa, N. A. (1999). Teaching Prepositions Using a Concordancer. The English Teacher, 28. Retrieved from http://www.melta.org.my/ET/1999/main6.html
    Dehé, N. (2002). Verb particle explorations (Vol. 1): Mouton de Gruyter.
    Gardner, D. E. E., & Davies, Mark. (2007). Pointing Out Frequent Phrasal Verbs: A Corpus-Based Analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 41(2), 339-359. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2007.tb00062.x
    Garside, R., Leech, G., & Sampson, G. (1987). The Computational Analysis of English: A Corpus-Based Approach: Longman.
    Geld, R, & Letica, S. (2011). Centrality of Spce in the Strategic Construal of up in English Particle verbs. In M. Brdar, M. Omazić, G. Buljan, V. Bagarić & T. Gradečak-Erdeljić (Eds.), Space and Time in Language, pp. 145-166. Frankfurt/New York: Peter Lang Verblag.
    Girju, R. (2009). The syntax and semantics of prepositions in the task of automatic interpretation of nominal phrases and compounds: A cross-linguistic study. Computational Linguistics, 35(2), 185-228.
    Grabowski, Joachim, & Miller, George A. (2000). Factors Affecting the Use of Dimensional Prepositions in German and American English: Object Orientation, Social Context, and Prepositional Pattern. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29(5), 517-553.
    Granger, S. (2002). A bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research. Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching, 3-33.
    Herskovits, A. (1986). Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
    Hoffmann, S, Evert, S, Smith, N, Lee, D, & Prytz, B. (2008). Corpus Linguistics with BNCweb: A Practial Guide. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
    Hying, C. (2007, June). A corpus-based analysis of geometric constraints on projective prepositions. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACL-SIGSEM Workshop on Prepositions, pp. 1-8. Association for Computational Linguistics.
    Jon, P, & Fletcher, J. (2004). Differetiating Types of Verb Particle Constructions. Paper presented at the The Australasian Language Technology Workshop.
    Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason: University Press.
    Klégr, A. (2009). English Equivalents of the Most Frequent Czech Prepositions. A Contrastive Corpus-based Study. In Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics Conference 2009 (CL2009), p. 40.
    Koosha, M., & Jafarpour, A. A. (2006). Data-driven learning and teaching collocation of prepositions: The case of Iranian EFL adult learners. Asian EFL journal, 8(4), 192-209.
    Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, I, theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Larsen-Freeman, D., & Celce-Murcia, M. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd ed.): Heinle & Heinle.
    Lee, M.C., & Chung, S.F. (2013). A Corpus-based, Multi-level Analysis of Prepositions in VP-down in-NP Constructions. Paper presented at the The 2013 International Conference on Applied Linguistics (APLX2013), Taipei, Taiwan.
    Leech, G.N, Rayson, P, & Wilson, A. (2001). Word frequencies in written and spoken English: Longman.
    Lindner, S. (1981). A Lexico-Semantic Analysis of English Verb Particle Constructions withouth “out” and “up”. (Ph.D.), University of California, San Diego. Available from Open Library
    Lindstromberg, S. (2010). English Prepositions Explained. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
    Lipka, Leonhard. (1972). Semantic Structure and Word-formation: Verb-particle Constructions in Contemporary English: Wilhelm Fink.
    Marshall, I. (1983). Choice of Grammatical Word-class Without Global Syntactic Analysis: Tagging Words in the LOB Corpus. Computers and the Humanities, 17(3), 139-150.
    Merlo, P., Crocker, M.W., & Berthouzoz, C. (1997). Attaching Multiple Prepositional Phrases: Generalized backed-off estimation. Paper presented at the Second Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing.
    Morgenstern, A., & Sekali, M. (2009). What Can Child Language Yell us about Prepositions?. Studies in Language and Cognition, 261-275.
    Mueller, C. M. (2011). English learners’ knowledge of prepositions: Collocational knowledge or knowledge based on meaning?. System, 39(4), 480-490.
    Mukundan, J., & Roslim, N. (2009). Textbook representation of prepositions.English language teaching, 2(4), P13.
    Otani, N. (2006). The Conceptual Basis of the Particles Up and Down in English: Asymmetries in Vertical Axis. Linguistic Science, 12, 95-115.
    Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S, Leech, G, & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive grammar of the English language. England: Longman.
    Pantel, P., & Lin, D. (2000). An unsupervised approach to prepositional phrase attachment using contextually similar words. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics.
    Paulussen, H. (1995). Corpus-based analysis of prepositions in English, Dutch and French. status: published.
    Potter, S. (1965). English phrasal verbs. Philologica pragensia, 8(23), 285-289.
    Retz-Schmidt, G. (1988). Various views on spatial prepositions. AI magazine,9(2), 95.
    Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (2003). Word Power: Phrasal Verbs and Compounds : a Cognitive Approach: Mouton de Gruyter.
    Saint-Dizier, P. (Ed.). (2006). Syntax and semantics of prepositions. Vol. 29. Springer.
    Srikumar, V., & Roth, D. (2013). Modeling semantic relations expressed by prepositions. Urbana, 51, 61801.
    Stetina, J., & Nagao, M. (1997). Corpus based PP attachment ambiguity resolution with a semantic dictionary. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the fifth workshop on very large corpora.
    Strumpf, M., & Douglas, A. (2004). The Grammar Bible: Everything You Always Wanted to Know About Grammar but Didn't Know Whom to Ask: Henry Holt and Company.
    Talmy, L. (2003). Toward a Cognitive Semantics - 2 volume set: Volume 1: Concept Structuring Systems and Volume 2: Typology and Process in Concept Structuring: MIT Press.
    Taylor, J. R. (1993). Prepositions: Patterns of polysemization and strategies of disambiguation. The Semantics of Prepositions, 3, 151.
    Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2001). Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: The case of over. Language, 77(4), 724-765.
    Tyler, A., & Evans, V. (2003). The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition: Cambridge University Press.
    Tyler, A, Mueller, Cc, & Vu, H. (2011). Applying Cognitive Linguistics to Learning the Semantics of English to, for and at: An Experimental Investigation. Vigo International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8, 181-205.
    Vandeloise, C., & Bosch, A.R.K. (1991). Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French: University of Chicago Press.
    Vorwerg, C. & Weiß, P. (2010). Verb Semantics Affects the Interpretation of Spatial Prepositions. Spatial Cognition & Computation, 10(4), 247-291. doi: 10.1080/13875861003663770
    Wikberg, K. (2006). The role of corpus studies in metaphor research. Selected Papers from the, 33-48.
    Yeh, A.S., & Vilain, M.B. (1998). Some properties of preposition and subordinate conjunction attachments. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th international conference on Computational linguistics-Volume 2.
    Description: 碩士
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099551016
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[英國語文學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    101601.pdf2330KbAdobe PDF38View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback