English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46339885      Online Users : 1058
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67085
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67085


    Title: 租稅規避與公司價值-以台灣上市櫃公司為例
    Tax Avoidance and Firm Value-A Study in Taiwan Publicly Traded Company
    Authors: 陳典陞
    Chen, Dian Sheng
    Contributors: 何怡澄
    陳典陞
    Chen, Dian Sheng
    Keywords: 租稅規避
    公司價值
    代理問題
    Tax avoidance
    Firm value
    Agency problem
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-01 12:04:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 為釐清公司租稅規避行為是否對股東有利,本文以實證方法檢視租稅規避行為與公司價值之關係,並探究公司治理是否會改變前述兩者間之關係。本研究以Tobin’s q和普通股市值衡量公司價值,租稅規避行為採財稅所得差異與現金有效稅率衡量,公司治理則以外部法人持股比例衡量。研究對象為民國89年至101年之國內上市櫃公司,並排除性質特殊之金融業。本文先採普通最小平方法進行實證分析,其實證結果顯示租稅規避行為與公司價值間有顯著的正向關聯性,與傳統理論之預期一致,但並不支持代理觀點,即公司治理並不會顯著地影響租稅規避行為與公司價值之關係。其後,為解決普通最小平方法的內生性疑慮,本文以外生政策建構工具變數重新進行迴歸分析,實證證據顯示租稅規避行為與公司價值間具顯著關係,且公司治理對兩者間之關係無顯著的影響。
    The main purpose of this paper is to clarify whether corporate tax avoidance activities advance shareholder interests. We employ empirical approach to examine the relationship between corporate tax avoidance and firm value and then the impacts of corporate governance on the aforementioned relationship. Firm value is measured by Tobin’s q and market value. Tax avoidance is measured by book-tax gap and annual cash effective tax rate, and corporate governance is proxied for by the level of external institutional ownership. We use a large sample of domestic listed firms for the period 2000-2012, and the financial industry is excluded from the sample owing to its special characteristics. The empirical evidence of OLS estimates indicate that the corporate tax avoidance is positively and significantly associated with firm value, as predicted by the traditional theory of tax avoidance. However, corporate governance has no significant impacts on the aforementioned relationship in OLS estimates, which is inconsistent with the agency perspective of tax avoidance. To resolve the concern from endogeneity, we construct instrumental variables estimates based on exogenous changes in tax regulations. The empirical evidence of instrumental variables estimates is consistent with OLS estimates.
    Reference: 王建煊與吳嘉勳,2011,租稅法,台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
    王惠美,2013,上巿櫃企業發行員工認股權之實證研究,淡江大學會計學系碩士論文。
    王澤建,2011,民法總則,台北:三民書局。
    林嬋娟與張哲嘉,2009,董監事異常變動、家族企業與企業舞弊之關聯性,會計評論,第48 期(1月):1-33。
    財政部,2012,政府理財之概論與實務,台北:財政部。
    陳明進,2000,我國公司平均有效稅率決定因素之實證研究:財務報表資料及課稅申報資料之分析比較,行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告。
    陳明進、汪瑞芝與林裕盛,2007,企業選擇公司五年免稅與股東投資抵減租稅規劃之實證研究,管理學報,第24卷第1期(2月):41-59。
    陳明進與蔡麗雯,2006,財稅所得差異決定因素及課稅所得推估之研究,管理學報,第23卷第6期(12月):739-763。
    陳清秀,2010,稅捐規避與處罰,國政評論,財金(研)099-011號。
    黃美祝,2010,財稅差異金額大小對國稅局選案查核之影響,會計評論,第50 期(1月):23-55。
    黃美祝與李映茹,2009,最低稅負制對企業租稅負擔影響之研究-高科技產業與傳統產業之比較,當代會計,第10卷第2期(11月):189-224。
    葛克昌,2005,稅法基本問題─財政憲法篇,台北:元照出版公司。
    葛克昌,1977,租稅規避之研究,國立臺灣大學法學論叢,第6卷第2期(3月): 167-187。
    葉銀華及邱顯比,1996,資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論, 台大管理論叢,第7卷第2期(8月):57-90。
    劉健右,2008,租稅規避之研究,國立政治大學法律學系碩士論文。
    Armstrong, C. S., J. L. Blouin., and D. F. Larcker. 2012. The incentives for tax planning. Journal of Accounting and Economics 53 (February–April): 391–411.
    Badertscher, B., S. P. Katz, and S. O. Rego. 2010. The impact of private equity ownership on portfolio firms’ corporate tax planning. Working paper, Harvard Business School.
    Bartov, E., F. A. Gul, and J. S. L. Tsui. 2001. Discretionary-accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (December): 421-452.
    Bleck, A., Liu, X. 2007. Market transparency and the accounting regime. Journal of Accounting Research 45 (May): 229–256.
    Chen, K. P., and C. Y. Chu. 2005. Internal control vs. external manipulation: A model of corporate income tax evasion. Rand Journal of Economics 36 (Winter): 151-164.
    Chen, S., X. Chen, Q. Cheng , and T. Shevlin. 2010. Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms? Journal of Financial Economics 95 (January):41–61. 
    Chen, K.-P.,Chu,C.Y.C. 2005. Internal control versus external manipula-tion: a model of corporate income tax evasion. The RAND Journal of Economics 36 (Winter):151–164.
    Cheng, C. S. A., H. H. Huang, Y. Li, and J. Stanfield. 2012. The effect of hedge fund activism on corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review (Forthcoming).
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58 (Special Issue): 81-112.
    Cressey, D. 1953. Other people’s money: A study in the social psychology of embezzlement. Glencoe, IL, Free Press. 
    Crocker, K.J., and J. Slemrod. 2005.Corporate tax evasion with agency costs. Journal of Public Economics 89 (September):1593–1610.
    Dechow, P. M., R. G. Sloan, and A. P. Sweeney. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review 70 (April): 193–225.
    Desai, M. A. 2003 .The divergence between book and tax income. Tax Policy and the Economy 17:169–206.
    Desai, M. A. 2005. The degradation of reported corporate profits. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (Autumn): 171–192.
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. 2006. Corporate tax avoidance and high powered incentives. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (January) : 145–179.
    Desai, M. A., and D. Dharmapala. 2009. Corporate tax avoidance and firm value. The Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (August): 537–546.
    Dyreng, S. D., M. Hanlon, and E. L. Maydew. 2008. Long-run corporate tax avoidance. The Accounting Review 83 (January): 61–82.
    Fairfield, P., R. Sweeney, and T. Yohn. 1996. Accounting classification and the predictive content of earnings. The Accounting Review 71 (July): 337–355.
    Gompers, P. A., J. Ishii, and A. Metrick. 2003. Corporate governance and equity prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (February): 107–155.
    Graham, J., Tucker, A. 2006. Tax shelters and corporate debt policy. Journal of Financial Economics 81 (September): 563–594.
    Hanlon, M., and G. Krishnan. 2006. Do auditors use information reflected in book-tax differences? Working paper, University of Michigan.
    Hanlon, M., and J. Slemrod. 2009. What does tax aggressiveness signal? Evidence from stock price reactions to news about tax shelter involvement. Journal of Public Economics 93 (February): 126–141.
    Hanlon, M., and S. Heitzman. 2012. A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 50 (December): 127–178.
    Hansen, L. P. 1982. Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica 50 (July): 1029–1054.
    Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7 (April): 85-107.
    Hudson, C., J. Jahera, and W. Lloyd. 1992. Further evidence on the relationship between ownership and performance. The Financial Review 27 (May): 227-239.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3 (July): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. ,and R. S. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11 (April): 5-50.
    Jin, L., Myers, C. S. 2006. R2 around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics 79 (February): 257–292.
    Kaplan, S. N., and L. Zingales. 1997. Do investment-cash flow sensitivities provide useful measures of financing constraints? Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (February): 169–216.
    Kim, J. B.; Y. Li; and L. Zhang. 2011. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-Level Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 100 (June): 639–62.
    Ko, C. Y., J. Park, and H. Jung. 2013. Managerial ability and tax avoidance. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 34 (December): 1-4.
    Lipe, R. 1986. The information contained in the components of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (Supplement):37–64.
    Lougee, B., and C. Marquardt. 2004. Earnings informativeness and strategic disclosure: An empirical examination of ‘‘pro forma’’ earnings. The Accounting Review 79 (July): 769–795.
    Manzon, G. B., and G. A. Plesko. 2002. The relation between financial and tax reporting measures of income. The Law Review 55 (February):175-214.
    McVay, S. E. 2006. Earnings management using classification shifting: An examination of core earnings and special items. The Accounting Review 81 (May): 501–531.
    Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38 (June): 163–184.
    Mills, L. F. 1998. Book-tax differences and internal revenue service adjustments. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Autumn): 343-356.
    Mills, L. and R. Sansing. 2000. Strategic tax and financial reporting decisions: Theory and evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research 17 (Spring): 85-106.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and corporate performance: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20 (January–March): 293–315.
    Oswald, S. L. and Jahera Jr. 1991. The influence of ownership on performance: An empirical study. Strategic Management Journal 12 (May): 218-228.
    Philips, J. D. 2003. Corporate tax-planning effectiveness: The role of compensation-based incentives. The Accounting Review 78 (July): 847-874.
    Poterba, J., Rao, N., Seidman, J. 2011. Deferred tax positions and incentives for corporate behavior around corporate tax changes. National Tax Journal 64 (March): 27–58.
    Rego, S. O., and R. Wilson. 2008. Executive compensation, tax reporting aggressiveness, and future firm performance. Working paper, University of Iowa.
    Scholes, M., M. Wolfson, M. Erickson, E. Maydew and T. Shevlin. 2005. Taxes and business strategy: A planning approach. 3rd edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    Slemrod, J. 2004. The economics of corporate tax selfishness. National Tax Journal 57 (December): 877–899.
    Slemrod, J., Yitzhaki, S. 2002. Tax avoidance, evasion, and administration. In: Auerbach, A., Feldstein, M. (Eds.), Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
    Vance, S. 1995. Inside or outside directors: Is there really a difference. Across The Board : 15-17.
    Weisbach, D. 2002. Ten truths about tax shelters. Tax Law Review 55 (May):215–253.
    Wilson, R. J. 2009. An examination of corporate tax shelter participants. The Accounting Review 84 (May): 969–999.
    Yeh, Y. H., T. S. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance 2 (March): 21-48.
    Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40 (February): 185-211.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    101353016
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013530161
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    016101.pdf1361KbAdobe PDF2766View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback