English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109948/140897 (78%)
Visitors : 46100304      Online Users : 738
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67568
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67568


    Title: 交融記憶系統、資訊精緻化與團隊創新-任務衝突、賦權領導及情感氛圍的調節效果
    Transactive Memory Systems, Information Elaboration and Team Innovation: The Moderating Effects of Task Conflict, Empowerment Leadership and Affective Tone
    Authors: 林昭宏
    Contributors: 黃家齊
    林昭宏
    Keywords: 交融記憶系統
    資訊精緻化
    團隊創新
    任務衝突
    賦權領導
    情感氛圍
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-21 15:33:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   時下企業使用團隊以促進創新的方式非常普遍,藉由成員背景的多元性發展出更多可行的新創方案,然而在團隊的專業分工模式下,團隊成員如何快速地瞭解其他成員的專長,並相互配合、協調,高效率地完成任務要求,成為重要的探討議題。團隊成員熟悉團隊內各種技能與知識的分布,並且信任其他成員的專業,彼此溝通協調,此現象稱為交融記憶系統,本研究以真實企業中的團隊為研究對象,且以從事研發或行銷等創意發想工作的團隊為主,探討交融記憶系統與團隊創新之間的關聯。另外,團隊成員對於任務資訊的交流與整合稱為資訊精緻化,本研究也探討資訊精緻化行為是否在兩變項之間擔任中介效果的角色。在交融記憶系統、資訊精緻化與團隊創新的主效果之外,本研究也好奇任務衝突、賦權領導及正、負向情感氛圍是否於其間具有調節效果。

      本研究共蒐集到70組研發團隊共334位團隊成員作為研究樣本,經過信、效度分析、配適度檢定、趨同性分析、相關分析及層級迴歸分析之後,得出之研究結果顯示交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間存在顯著正向關係。任務衝突、賦權領導與正向情感氛圍各自與資訊精緻化之間具有顯著正向關係,而賦權領導對於交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間之正向關係具有顯著正向調節效果。另外,任務衝突對於交融記憶系統與資訊精緻化之間之正向關係具有顯著負向調節效果,而賦權領導對於交融記憶系統與團隊創新之間之正向關係具有顯著負向調節效果,此兩者與原假設之調節方向相反。
    Reference: Agrell, A., & Gustafson, R. (1996). Innovation and creativity in work groups.Handbook of Work group
    Psychology, 317-343.

    Ahearne, M., Mathieu, J., & Rapp, A. (2005). To empower or not to empower your sales force? An
    empirical examination of the influence of leadership empowerment behavior on customer satisfaction
    and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 945.

    Akgün, A. E., Byrne, J., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in
    new product development projects: a transactive memory perspective. Information &
    Management, 42(8), 1105-1120.

    Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal
    of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357.

    Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work
    environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

    Anderson, N. R., & West, M. A. (1998). Measuring climate for work group innovation: development
    and validation of the team climate inventory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19(3), 235-258.

    Arnold, J. A., Arad, S., Rhoades, J. A., & Drasgow, F. (2000). The empowering leadership
    questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. Journal
    of Organizational Behavior, 21(3), 249-269.

    Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social
    psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173.

    Bartel, C. A., & Saavedra, R. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative
    Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197-231.

    Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations.

    Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002). Organizational behavior: Affect in the workplace. Annual review of
    psychology, 53(1), 279-307.

    Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit.Sociological Methods &
    Research, 21(2), 230-258.

    Caldwell, D. F., & O`Reilly, C. A. (2003). The Determinants of Team-Based Innovation in
    Organizations The Role of Social Influence. Small Group Research,34(4), 497-517.

    Carnevale, P. J., & Probst, T. M. (1998). Social values and social conflict in creative problem solving
    and categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1300.

    Clore, G. L., Schwarz, N., & Conway, M. (1994). Affective causes and consequences of social
    information processing. Handbook of Social Cognition,1, 323-417.

    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and
    innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.

    Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and
    innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 128-152.

    Cole, M. S., Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). Affective mechanisms linking dysfunctional behavior to performance in work teams: a moderated mediation study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 945.

    Collins, A. L., Lawrence, S. A., Troth, A. C., & Jordan, P. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S43-S62.

    Cronin, M. A., Bezrukova, K., Weingart, L. R., & Tinsley, C. H. (2011). Subgroups within a team: The
    role of cognitive and affective integration. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(6), 831-849.

    Davenport, T. H. (1997). Ten principles of knowledge management and four case studies. Knowledge
    and Process Management, 4(3), 187-208.

    Davis, M. S. (1973). Intimate relations. Free Press.

    De Dreu, C. K. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship
    between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.

    De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and
    team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741.

    De Dreu, C. K., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: the importance of
    participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191.

    Delery, J. E., & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management:
    Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of
    Management Journal, 39(4), 802-835.

    de Wit, F. R., Jehn, K. A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and
    decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict.Organizational Behavior and Human
    Decision Processes, 122(2), 177-189.

    Drach-Zahavy, A., & Somech, A. (2001). Understanding team innovation: The role of team processes
    and structures. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 5(2), 111.

    Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative
    Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350-383.

    Fangcheng Tang (2014). When communication quality is trustworthy? Transactive memory systems
    and the mediating role of trust in software development teams

    Ford, R. C., & Fottler, M. D. (1995). Empowerment: A matter of degree. The Academy of Management
    Executive, 9(3), 21-29.

    George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75,
    107–116.

    George, J. M. (1995). Leader positive mood and group performance: The case of customer
    service. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25(9), 778-794.

    George, J. M. (1996). Group affective tone. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology
    (pp. 77–93). New York: Wiley.

    George, J. M., & Brief, A. P. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at
    work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 310.

    Gibson, C. B., & Earley, P. C. (2007). Collective Cognition in Action: Accumulation, Interaction,
    Examination, and Accommodation in the Development and Operation of Group Efficacy Beliefs in the
    Workplace. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 438-458.


    Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. (1993). The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group
    judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65(5), 959.

    Gilson, L. L., & Shalley, C. E. (2004). A little creativity goes a long way: An examination of teams’
    engagement in creative processes. Journal of Management, 30(4), 453-470.

    Gino, F., Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E., & Todorova, G. (2010). First, get your feet wet: The effects of
    learning from direct and indirect experience on team creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human
    Decision Processes, 111(2), 102-115.

    Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls
    in multilevel research. Academy of Management review, 10(3), 601-616.

    Hair, J. F., Tathom, R. L., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (1992). Multivariate data analysis: with
    readings.

    Hair Jr, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (Intl.
    ed.).

    Hirt, E. R., Melton, R. J., McDonald, H. E., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Processing goals, task
    interest, and the mood–performance relationship: A mediational analysis. Journal of Personality and
    Social Psychology, 71(2), 245.

    Hollenbeck, J. R., Colquitt, J. A., Ilgen, D. R., LePine, J. A., & Hedlund, J. (1998). Accuracy
    decomposition and team decision making: Testing theoretical boundary conditions. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 83(3), 494.

    Hollenbeck, J. R., Ilgen, D. R., Sego, D. J., Hedlund, J., Major, D. A., & Phillips, J. (1995). Mutlilevel
    theory of team decision making: Decision performance in teams incorporating distributed
    expertise. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(2), 292.

    Hollingshead, A. B. (1998). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality
    and Social Psychology, 74(3), 659.

    Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis:
    Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary
    Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

    Hülsheger, U. R., Anderson, N., & Salgado, J. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a
    comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology,
    94(5), 1128.

    Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem
    solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1122.

    Isen, A. M., Johnson, M. M., Mertz, E., & Robinson, G. F. (1985). The influence of positive affect on
    the unusualness of word associations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1413.

    Ives, B., & Olson, M. H. (1984). User involvement and MIS success: a review of
    research. Management science, 30(5), 586-603.

    Jackson, M., & Moreland, R. L. (2009). Transactive memory in the classroom.Small Group
    Research, 40(5), 508-534.

    Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. A. West
    (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 53-75). London: Wiley.

    James, L. R. (1982). Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 67(2), 219.

    James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with
    and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(1), 85.

    Janssen, O., Van De Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of
    positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117-141.

    Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup
    conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 256-282.

    Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through
    value-based intragroup conflict. Using Conflict in Organizations, 87-100.

    Jung, D. I., Chow, C., & Wu, A. (2003). The role of transformational leadership in enhancing
    organizational innovation: Hypotheses and some preliminary findings. The Leadership
    Quarterly, 14(4), 525-544.

    Kanawattanachai, P., & Yoo, Y. (2007). The impact of knowledge coordination on virtual team
    performance over time. Mis Quarterly, 783-808.

    Kanfer, R. (1990). Motivation theory and industrial and organizational psychology.

    Kanter, R. M. (2000). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for
    innovation in organization. Entrepreneurship: The Social Science View, 167-210.

    Kearney, E., Gebert, D., & Voelpel, S. C. (2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: the
    importance of team members` need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581-598.

    Kelley, H. H., Berscheid, E., Christensen, A., Harvey, J. H., Huston, T. L., Levinger, G., ... & Peterson,
    D. R. Close relationships. 1983.

    Kelly, J. R., & Barsade, S. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work
    teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99-130.

    Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1997). A model of work team empowerment. Research in organizational
    change and development, 10, 131-167.

    Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team
    empowerment. Academy of Management Journal,42(1), 58-74.

    Knippenberg, D. V., & Wilke, H. (1992). Prototypicality of arguments and conformity to ingroup
    norms. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22(2), 141-155.

    Kooij-de Bode, H. J., van Knippenberg, D., & van Ginkel, W. P. (2008). Ethnic diversity and
    distributed information in group decision making: The importance of information elaboration. Group
    Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,12(4), 307.

    Kozlowski, S. W., & Bell, B. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. Handbook of
    Psychology.

    Kozlowski, S. W., & Klein, K. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations:
    Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes.



    Lee, C. S., Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2007). Effects of Transformational Leadership and Self-leadership on
    Innovative Behaviors: Mediating Roles of Empowerment. International Area Studies Review, 10(2),
    163-176.

    Leenders, R. T. A., Van Engelen, J. M., & Kratzer, J. (2003). Virtuality, communication, and new
    product team creativity: a social network perspective.Journal of Engineering and Technology
    Management, 20(1), 69-92.

    Levine, J. M., Resnick, L. B., & Higgins, E. T. (1993). Social foundations of cognition. Annual Review
    of Psychology, 44(1), 585-612.

    Lewis, K. (2003). Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: scale development and
    validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 587.

    Lewis, K. (2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of
    transactive memory systems. Management Science,50(11), 1519-1533.

    Lewis, K., Belliveau, M., Herndon, B., & Keller, J. (2007). Group cognition, membership change, and
    performance: Investigating the benefits and detriments of collective knowledge. Organizational
    Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 103(2), 159-178.

    Lewis, K., & Herndon, B. (2011). Transactive memory systems: Current issues and future research
    directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1254-1265.

    Lewis, K., Lange, D., & Gillis, L. (2005). Transactive memory systems, learning, and learning
    transfer. Organization Science, 16(6), 581-598.

    Liang, A. Z., & Jin, Y. H. (2010, November). Transactive Memory Systems in Multi-teams Cooperation. In Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII), 2010
    International Conference on (Vol. 4, pp. 3-7). IEEE.

    Liang, D. W., Moreland, R., & Argote, L. (1995). Group versus individual training and group
    performance: The mediating role of transactive memory. Personality and Social Psychology
    Bulletin, 21(4), 384-393.

    Lipman-Blumen, J., & Leavitt, H. J. (1999). Hot groups: Seeding them, feeding them, and using them
    to ignite your organization. New York: Oxford University Press

    Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. Handbook of Affective
    Science, 619(642), 3.

    MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of
    sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological methods, 1(2), 130.

    Mackie, D. M., Worth, L. T., & Asuncion, A. G. (1990). Processing of persuasive in-group
    messages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(5), 812.

    Marks, M. A., Zaccaro, S. J., & Mathieu, J. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and
    team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 85(6), 971.

    Martin, L. L., Ward, D. W., Achee, J. W., & Wyer, R. S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret
    the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(3),
    317.

    Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (2005). Scaling the
    quality of teammates` mental models: equifinality and normative comparisons. Journal of
    Organizational Behavior, 26(1), 37-56.

    Mathieu, J. E., Heffner, T. S., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., & Cannon-Bowers, J. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273..

    Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational
    trust. Academy of management review, 20(3), 709-734.

    McLeod, P. L., Lobel, S. A., & Cox, T. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small
    Group Research, 27(2), 248-264.

    Meyer, B., Shemla, M., & Schermuly, C. C. (2011). Social category salience moderates the effect of
    diversity faultlines on information elaboration. Small Group Research.

    Moreland, R. L. (1999). Transactive memory: Learning who knows what in work groups and
    organizations.

    Moreland, R. L., Argote, L., & Krishnan, R. (1996). Socially shared cognition at work: Transactive
    memory and group performance.

    Mulaik, Stanley A., et al. "Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation
    models." Psychological bulletin 105.3 (1989): 430.

    Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and
    innovation. Psychological bulletin, 103(1), 27.

    Murray, N., Sujan, H., Hirt, E. R., & Sujan, M. (1990). The influence of mood on categorization: A
    cognitive flexibility interpretation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 411.

    Nemeth, C. J. (1986). Differential contributions of majority and minority influence. Psychological
    review, 93(1), 23.

    Nemeth, C. J., & Owens, P. (1996). Making work group more effective: The value of minority dissent.
    In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of Work Group Psychology (pp. 125-141). London: Wiley.

    Nijstad, B. A., & De Dreu, C. K. (2002). Creativity and group innovation. Applied Psychology, 51(3),
    400-406.

    N Nijstad, B. A., Rietzschel, E. F., & Stroebe, W. (2006). Four principles of group creativity. Creativity
    and innovation in organizational teams, 161-79.

    Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). Psychometric theory.

    Pearsall, M. J., & Ellis, A. P. (2006). The effects of critical team member assertiveness on team
    performance and satisfaction. Journal of Management,32(4), 575-594.

    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in
    behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 88(5), 879.

    Prichard, J. S., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2007). The effects of team-skills training on transactive memory and
    performance. Small Group Research, 38(6), 696-726.

    Rau, D. (2005). The influence of relationship conflict and trust on the transactive memory performance
    relation in top management teams. Small Group Research, 36(6), 746-771.


    Ren, Y., Carley, K. M., & Argote, L. (2006). The contingent effects of transactive memory: When is it
    more beneficial to know what others know?.Management Science, 52(5), 671-682.

    Rhee, S. Y. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member
    interactions. Research on Managing groups and teams, 10, 65-95.

    Riedl, B. C., Gallenkamp, J. V., Picot, A., & Welpe, I. M. (2012, January). Antecedents of Transactive
    Memory Systems in Virtual Teams--The Role of Communication, Culture, and Team Size. In System
    Science (HICSS), 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 465-474). IEEE.

    Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1991). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective
    states on analytic reasoning. Emotion and Social Judgments, 55-71.

    Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual
    factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 33-53.

    Sharkie, R. (2005 , July 19-22). Perceptions of trust in an organisation: The factors that influence the
    sharing of tacit knowledge. In Fifth International Conference on Knowledge, Culture and Change in
    Organisations. Rhodes, Greece: University of the Aegean.

    Shonk, J. H. (1982). Working in teams: A practical manual for improving work groups. New York:
    Amacom.

    Siegel Christian, J., Pearsall, M. J., Christian, M. S., & Ellis, A. P. (2014). Exploring the benefits and
    boundaries of transactive memory systems in adapting to team member loss. Group Dynamics: Theory,
    Research, and Practice, 18(1), 69.

    Skilton, P. F., & Dooley, K. J. (2010). The effects of repeat collaboration on creative abrasion. Academy
    of Management Review, 35(1), 118-134.

    Stasser, G. (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. Shared cognition in
    organizations: The management of knowledge, 49-69.

    Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on
    the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social
    Psychology, 53(1), 81.


    Sy, T., Côté, S., & Saavedra, R. (2005). The contagious leader: impact of the leader`s mood on the
    mood of group members, group affective tone, and group processes. Journal of Applied
    Psychology, 90(2), 295.

    Thomas, K. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An “interpretive”
    model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 666-681.

    Tindale, R. S., Kameda, T., & Hinsz, V. B. (2003). Group decision making. Sage Handbook of Social
    Psychology, 381-403.

    Tindale, R. S., Smith, C. M., Thomas, L. S., Filkins, J., & Sheffey, S. (1996). Shared representations
    and asymmetric social influence processes in small groups. Understanding group behaviour:
    Consensual action by small groups, 81-103.

    Tjosvold, D. (1990). Team organization: An enduring competitive advantage. Chichester, England:
    Wiley.

    Tjosvold, D. (1997). Conflict within Interdependence: Its Value for Productivity and
    Individuality. Using Conflict in Organizations, 23.

    Van de Vliert, E., & De Dreu, C. K. (1994). Optimizing performance by conflict
    stimulation. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5(3), 211-222.

    van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. (2008). Group information elaboration and group decision
    making: The role of shared task representations.Organizational Behavior and Human Decision
    Processes, 105(1), 82-97.

    Van Knippenberg, D., De Dreu, C. K., & Homan, A. C. (2004). Work group diversity and group performance: an integrative model and research agenda.Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1008.

    Van Offenbeek, M., & Koopman, P. (1996). Interaction and decision making in project
    teams. Handbook of Work Group Psychology, 159, C187.

    Vesa, P. & Mervi, H. (August, 2011). The impact of transactive memory systems and transformational
    leadership on team innovation. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings

    Walter, F., & Bruch, H. (2008). The positive group affect spiral: A dynamic model of the emergence of
    positive affective similarity in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 239-261.

    Walton, R. E., & Dutton, J. M. (1969). The management of interdepartmental conflict: A model and
    review. Administrative Science Quarterly, 73-84.

    Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of
    positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6),
    1063.

    Wegner, D. M., Giuliano, T., & Hertel, P. T. (1985). Cognitive interdependence in close relationships.
    In Compatible and Incompatible Relationships (pp. 253-276). Springer New York.

    Weiss, H. M., & Cropanzano, R. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the
    structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work.

    West, M. A. (1990). The social psychology of innovation in groups.

    West, M. A. (2002). Sparkling fountains or stagnant ponds: An integrative model of creativity and
    innovation implementation in work groups. Applied Psychology, 51(3), 355-387.

    West, M. A., & Altink, W. M. (1996). Innovation at work: Individual, group, organizational, and socio-historical perspectives. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 3-11.

    West, M. A., & Wallace, M. (1991). Innovation in health care teams. European Journal of Social
    Psychology, 21(4), 303-315.

    Winquist, J. R., & Larson Jr, J. R. (1998). Information pooling: When it impacts group decision
    making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 371.

    Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups.

    Yuan, Y. C., Carboni, I., & Ehrlich, K. (2010). The impact of awareness and accessibility on expertise
    retrieval: A multilevel network perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science
    and Technology, 61(4), 700-714.


    Zhang, X., & Bartol, K. M. (2010). Linking empowering leadership and employee creativity: The
    influence of psychological empowerment, intrinsic motivation, and creative process
    engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 107-128.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理研究所
    101355003
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013550031
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    003101.pdf1080KbAdobe PDF2131View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback