English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140891 (78%)
Visitors : 46240077      Online Users : 1019
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67746


    Title: 性別差異下的立法院
    Other Titles: Gender Differences in the Legislative Yuan
    Authors: 楊婉瑩
    Yang, Wan-ying
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 差異政治;性別;代表性;描述性代表;實質代表;象徵性代表;選民認同;政策偏好
    politics of difference;gender;representation;descriptive representation;substantive representation;symbolic representation;constituency identification;policy preferences
    Date: 2001.12
    Issue Date: 2014-07-28 15:01:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 過去關於代議政治的性別研究，多著墨於男女代表在立法效能上的比較，本研究試圖擺脫過去的限制，釐清究竟男女代議士的角色是否有所區別且其界線何在。本研究首先由理論探討性別與代表性的關係，就自由主義者的觀點而言，代議士應超越任何認同群體的利益，包括本身的性別或是階級認同，致力於代表全體利益。社群主義者則認為，在共同的認同基礎上，代議士應積極代表本身所屬的認同群體，透過女代表的出現（presence），婦女的利益才能獲得實踐，描述性代表乃是實質性代表的前提要件。本研究透過與第三屆立法委員的實際深入訪談，比較男女立委在代表認知與行為上的可能差異，研究顯示性別差異確實出現於立法院內，沿著選民認同與政策偏好兩個面向將男女立委切割成不同的代議士群體，主觀上認同婦女選民也使得女性立委在客觀上願意投注較多心力於婦女議題，不同立法面向之間呈現出一致性與相關性。同時在面臨各種制度內外的主客觀的壓抑性別差異的限制時，Carroll (1992)的婦女網絡的觀點也解釋了性別差異在代議制度內（立法院）被保存與維繫的原因。
    Compared with past studies of female compatibility with men in the arena of representational politics, this study goes further, and looks to explore exactly what it is that distinguishes women from men, and the rationale of considering gender divisions as an integral part of normal party politics. I start with the theoretical discussion regarding representation. The liberal theorists maintain that our representative bodies should transcend interests based on group identity. In contrast, the supporters of the politics of identity claim that representatives should represent different identity groups, and particularly those that are oppressed. To evaluate whether gender makes a difference in terms of legislator`s attitudes toward representation, I interviewed a sample of legislators to explore and compare male and female representatives’ conceptualizations and attitudes to representation. Over all, I have observed a significant gender difference as regards women’s issues, with respect to constituency perception and policy priority. I also find a causal link between these two seemingly correspondent gender patterns. Even though the variety of considerations may prevent women from bringing forth any significant changes, women are more likely to be involved with or develop women’s networks, and that such networking is conducive to developing a stronger female group identity and identifying with women’s culture.
    Relation: 政治科學論叢, 15, 135-170
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    135170.pdf297KbAdobe PDF2946View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback