English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25786342      Online Users : 179
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67791

    Title: 政治分析與研究方法:論2002年立法院行使考試院正副院長同意權之投票模式
    Other Titles: On Research Methodology and Political Analysis: A Cross-Level Inference of the Legislative Yuan's Consent Vote to the Nominees of the President and Vice-President of the Examination Yuan in 2002
    Authors: 黃紀;吳重禮
    Huang, Chi
    Contributors: 政治系
    Keywords: 研究方法;跟層推論;分裂投票;一致投票;立法院
    research methodology;cross-level(ecological) inference;splitticket voting;straight-ticket voting;the Legislative Yuan
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 10:38:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在社會科學領域之中,「瞭解事實,還原真相」,為研究考必須釐清、但卻可能是甚為棘手的問題。本研究以二○○二年六月二十一日立法院對於考試院正、副院長行使同意權為分析案例,嘗試藉由量化與質化交互為用的「跟層推論」(cross-level inference)的分析與新聞媒體的質化訊息,還原立法院對於考試院正副院長行使同意權的實際面貌。基本上,相關推論結果甚為「穩定」(robust),儘管與若即政治人物所宣稱的情形,差距甚遠。在結論中,本文提出該研究方法對爾後學術研究的意涵。
    Social scientists constantly face the challenge of recovering information from messy and/or limited data. This article advocates a backward-elimination approach to cross-level inference that takes full advantage of known auxiliary data to recover unobserved and yet crucial information. Through examining the controversial case of the Legislative Yuan’s Consent Vote to the Nominees of the President and Vice-President of the Examination Yuan on June 21,2002, we show how to solve the puzzle of “who abstained in the vice-president nominee’s consent vote” by inferring the voting patterns of each party’s legislators from aggregate vote counts and news reports. Our solution is quite robust to various assumed scenarios despite the contrary claims made by politicians and pundits. We thus conclude that political scientists can expand their academic landscape by making creative use of this rich arsenal of research methodology.
    Relation: 問題與研究, 42(1), 1-17
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    117.pdf1151KbAdobe PDF692View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback