English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 110096/141043 (78%)
Visitors : 46392505      Online Users : 1672
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/67856
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67856


    Title: 高階經理人超額薪酬與專利權之關聯性-以高科技產業為例
    The Relationship between CEO Excess Compensation and Patents: Evidence from High-Technology Industries
    Authors: 黃榆芳
    Contributors: 梁嘉紋
    黃榆芳
    Keywords: 超額薪酬
    專利權
    高階經理人
    Excess compensation
    Patent
    CEO
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 16:02:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 根據過去文獻公司經常以管理階層之薪酬契約來解決代理問題,激勵經理人做出股東財富極大化之決策。而過去企業衡量經理人績效時,大多使用財務性指標,然而知識時代來臨,傳統財務性指標已不足衡量獎酬制度,尤其當公司策略重視創新及品質導向時,若獎酬只與傳統財務績效指標做連結,可能會導致經理人做出不當的決策,故亦應加入非財務性指標來決定獎酬。本文主要探討專利權對高階經理人超額薪酬之影響,由於專利權對於獲利存在遞延效果,本文推論董事會可能依據外部人無法觀察到的當期非財務性績效指標,給予相對應之超額薪酬。
    由於專利權對於高科技業更為重要,因此本研究以高科技產業公司為樣本,進行實證研究,結果顯示公司專利權申請數、核准數及被引證次數愈多,高階經理人超額薪酬愈高。
    Traditionally, firms use financial performance measures to reward managers and thus align managerial incentives with the interest of shareholders. However, recent evidence shows that firms are increasing using non-financial performance measures to evaluate CEO performance, especially when firms emphasize on innovation and quality. The purpose of this study is to examine the relation between patents information and CEO excess compensation for high-tech firms. The empirical results show that CEO excess compensation is positively associated with patent counts and patent citations after controlling for financial performance measures. Overall, the evidence suggests that non-financial performance measures provide incremental information about CEO efforts over financial measures and thus compensation committees adjust CEO compensation for non-financial performance.
    Reference: 吳思華、黃宛華與賴鈺晶,1999,智慧資本衡量因素之研究―以我國軟體業為例,中華民國科技管理研討會論文集:591-604。
    沈玉瑛,2001,競爭策略與訂價策略配合對新產品績效影響之研究-以產品專利類型為分析,中原大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    吳長駿,2003,研究發展費用、專利權與企業績效之關聯性研究,兼論專利法修法影響,國立中正大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    林由雪,1997,台灣高科技產業的研究發展、持股類型與經營績效之研究,國立中央大學財務管理學系碩士論文。
    林穎芬,1988,民營企業最高主管報償與公司績效之研究,國立中山大學企業
    管理學系碩士論文。
    林穎芬與劉維琪,2003,從高階主管薪酬的研究探討代理理論在臺灣的適用程度,管理學報,第20期:365–395。
    金雅蘭,2009,專利權與企業績效之關係-以資源基礎觀點,國立屏東科技大學科技管理研究所碩士論文。
    洪士剛,2007,專利權對高階經理人薪酬之影響,國立政治大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    胡家菱,2004,專利權及專利引用資訊對公司價值的影響--台灣上市公司實證 (1990~1999年),國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
    施念恕,1996,會計盈餘、股價與高階主管薪酬之相關性研究,國立中興大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    陳俊合,2010,未費用化薪酬與超額薪酬對高階管理當局薪酬揭露之影響,會計評論,50: 89-113。
    陳隆麒、郭敏華與吳政穎,1998,我國上市公司高階主管薪酬決定因素之探討,中國財務學會年會暨學術研討會論文集:925-943。
    陳契盈,2000,由專利資料分析我國之研發產出及其關聯,國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士論文。
    曾玉潔,2000,我國高階主管薪酬決定因素之實證研究,國立中正大學會計學研
    究所碩士論文。
    曾詩薇,1995,影響總經理獎酬因素-公司績效、董事會監督能力或大股東控制
    力,逢甲大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    曾俊堯,2003,創新資本對經營績效與公司價值影響之研究,國立台北大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    游宛純,2010,專利引證數、研發支出與公司規模對專利績效影響之研究─以美國半導體產業為例,國立雲林科技大學企業管理研究所論文。
    湯珮妤,2000,企業類型與研發支出、專利權成效之遞延效果研究,國立中正大學會計學研究所碩士論文。
    辜秋屏,1997,高階主管酬勞與公司經營績效之實證研究,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    黃文英,2001,資訊軟體業之專利權對企業價值之效應研究,私立東吳大學會計研究所碩士論文。
    黃旭輝,1996 ,公司成長機會對經理人持股、報償與董事監察人組成影響之研
    究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所博士論文。
    黃琪惠,2008,專利權、創新多元化與企業績效之關係以台灣科技產業為例,國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    葉玉慧,2003,專利權、創新投資與公司價值創造關係之研究-以研發投資宣告為例,國立成功大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    董珮珊,2004,公司治理、公司績效與高階主管薪酬關係之研究,真理大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    劉正田、林修葳與金成隆,2005,創新價值鏈之路徑分析:企業研發投資成效之實證研究,管理評論,第24卷,第4期:29-56。
    劉長昀,2001,以平衡計分卡觀點探討企業核心資源與經營效率--以台灣某電子公司為例,國防管理學院資源管理研究所碩士論文。
    蔡柳卿,2003,總經理薪酬、非財務績效衡量指標與公司未來績效,會計評論,第37期(7月):85-116。
    戴怡蕙,2012,內部董事超額薪酬和公司未來績效-隱性合約觀點之實證研究,國立台灣大學管理學院會計學研究所博士論文。
    鄭國強,2004,廠商的專利行為與市場價值關聯-以全球半導體產業為例,世新大學管理學院財務金融系碩士論文。
    闕河士、管瑞昌與黃旭輝,2000,研究發展密集度與專利對股票績效影響-以台灣上市公司為例,產業管理學報,第1卷,第2期:257-268。
    Antle, R., and A. Smith. 1986. An empirical investigation of the relative performance evaluation of corporate executives. Journal of Accounting Research 24 (spring): 1-39.
    Austin, D. H. 1993. An event study approach to measuring innovative output: The case of biotechnology. American Economic Review 83 (2): 253-258.
    Balkin, D. B., G. D. Markman, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2000. Is CEO pay in high-technology firm related to innovation? Academy of Management Journal 43 (6): 1118-1129.
    Balsam, S. 1998. Discretionary accounting choices and CEO compensation. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 (Fall): 229-252.
    Baker, G., R. Gibbons, and K. J. Murphy. 1994. Subjective performance measurement in optional incentive contracts. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109: 1125-1156.
    Banker, R. D. and S. M. Datar. 1989. Sensitivity, precision, and linear aggregation of signals for performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 27: 21-39.
    Banker R. D. , M. N. Darrough, R. Huang and, J. M. Plehn-Dujowich. 2013. The Relation between CEO compensation and past performance. The Accounting review,88 (1): 1-30.
    Barer, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decidions:The case of research and development. Journal of Accounting review 66: 818-829.
    Bassi, L. J., and M. E. Van Buren. 1999. Valuing investment in intellectual capital. International Journal of Technology Management 18: 414-432.
    Bizjak, J. M., J. A. Brickley and J. L.Coles. 1993. Stock-based incentive compensation and investment behavior. Journal of Accounting Economics: 349-372.
    Booth, R. 1998. The measurement of intellectual capital. Management Accounting 76: 26-28.
    Bosworth, D. and M. Rogers. 2001. Market value, R&D and intellectual property: An empirical analysis of large Australian firms. Economic Record 77 (239): 323-337.
    Brick, I. E., O. Palmon, and J. K. Wald. 2006. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance 12: 403-423.
    Brigham, E. F. 1985. Financial management, theory an practice. The Dryden Press, Ho 15-Saunders Japan:13-14.
    Bushman, R., R. Indjejikian, and A. Smith. 1996. CEO compensation: the role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (April): 161-193.
    Cheng, S. 2004. R&D expenditures and CEO compensation. The Accounting Review 79 (2): 305-328.
    Clinch, G. 1991. Employee compensation and firms` research and development activity. Journal of Accounting Research 29 (1): 59-78.
    Cockburn, I. and Z. Griliches. 1988. Industry effects and appropriability measures in the stock market’s valuation of R&D and patents. American Economic Review Proceedings 78: 419-423.
    Connolly, R. A., and M. Hirschey. 1990. Firm size and R&D effectiveness: A value-based test. Economics Letters 32: 277-281.
    Core, J. E. 1997. The directors’ and officers’ insurance premium: an outside assessment of the cost of weak corporate governance. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 16 (2): 449-477.
    Core, L. E., R. W. Holthausen and D. F. Larcker. 1999.Corporate governance, chief officer compensation, and performance. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 371-406.
    Coughlan, A. T. and R. M. Schmidt. 1985. Executive compensation, management turnover, and firm performance: An empirical, investigation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 7: 43-66.
    Cyert, R., S. Kang, P. Kumar, and A. Shah. 1997. Corporate governance and the level of CEO compensation. Working Paper, Carnegie Mellon University.
    Davila, A., and M. Venkatachalam. 2004. The relevance of non-financial performance measures for CEO compensation. Review of Accounting Studies. 9 (4): 443-464.
    Dechow, P. and R. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and hrizon problem. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14: 51-89.
    Deckop, J. R. 1987. Top executive compensation and the pay-for-performance. New Perspectives on Compensation.NJ: Prentice-Hall.
    Deng, Z., B. Lev, and F. Narin. 1999. Science and technology as predictors of stock performance. Financial Analysts Journal (May/June): 20-32.
    Doukas, J. and L. Switzer. 1992. The stock market’s valuation of R&D spending and market concentration. Journal of Economics and Business 44: 95-114.
    Drucker, P. F. 1993. Post-Capitalist Society. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.
    Dzinkowski, R. 2000. The measurement and management of intellectual capital:An introduction. Management Accounting 78 (2): 32-36.
    Eccles, Robert G. and P. J. Pyburn. 1992. Creating a comprehensive system to measure performance. Management Accounting 74 (4): 41-44.
    Ederhof, M. 2010. Discretion in bonus plans. The Accounting review 85 (6): 1921-1949.
    Edvinsson, L. and M. S. Malone. 1997. Intellectual capital:Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden roots. New York: HarperBusiness.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: an assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14 (1): 57-74.
    Ernst, H. 2001. Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance:Evidence
    from time-series cross-section analysis on the firm level. Research Policy 30 (1):
    143-157.
    Fama, E. F., and, M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26: 301-325.
    Feltham, G. A., and J. Xie. 1994. Performance measure congruity and diversity inmulti-task principal/agent relations. The Accounting Review 69 (July): 429-453.
    Finkelstein, S. and D. C. Hambrick. 1989. Chief executive compensation:A study of the intersection of markets and political process. Strategic Management Journal 10 (2): 121-134.
    Fleischer, M. 1998. Patenting andindustrial performance: The case of themachine tool industry. Research Area Market Processesand Corporate Development Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin. Discussion Paper, FSIV 98-9.
    Gaver, J. J. and K. M. Gaver. 1995. Compensation policy and the investment opportunity set. Financial Management 24 (1): 19-32.
    Gomez-Mejia, L. R. and R. M. Wiseman. 1997. Reframing executive compensation: An assessment and outlook. Journal of Management 23 (3): 291-374.
    Gomez-Mejia, L. R., H. Tosi and T. Hinkin. 1987. Managerial control, performance, and executive compensation. Academy of Management Journal 30: 51-70.
    Griliches, Z. 1981. Market value, R&D, and patents. Economics Letters 7: 183-187.
    Griliches, Z. 1987. R&D and productivity: Measurement issues and econometric results. Science 237: 31-35.
    Griliches, Z. 1990. Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature 28 (December): 1661-1707.
    Gu, F. 2005. Innovation, Future Earnings, and Market Efficiency. Journal of Accounting, auditing,and finance 20 : 385-481.
    Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe and R. M. Ham. 1999. The determinants of patenting in the US semiconductor industry. NBER Working Paper.
    Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg. 2000. Market value and patent citations: A first look. Working Paper, University of California at Berkeley.
    Hall, R., A. Jaffe and M. Trajtenberg. 2001. Innovation in Israel 1968-1997: A comparative analysis using patent data. Research Policy. 30 (3): 363-389.
    Hall, L. A. and S. Bagchi-Sen. 2002. A study of R&D, innovation, and business performance in the Canadian biotechnology industry. Technovation 22: 231-144.
    Hambrick, D. C. and, C. C. Snow. 1989. Strategic reward systems, In C.C. Snow (Ed.) Strategy organizational design and human resource management. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press:929-964.
    Harhoff, D., F. Narin, F. M. Scherer, and K. Vopel. 1999. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. The Review of Economics and Statistics 81 (3): 511-515.
    Hayes, R. M. and S. Schaefer. 2000. Implicit contracts and the explanatory power of top executive compensation for future performance. RAND Journal of Economics 31 (2): 273-293.
    Hemmer, T. 1996. On the design and choice of “modern” management accounting measures. Journal of managerial Accounting Research 8: 87-116.
    Hirschey, M., and J. J. Weygandt. 1985. Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1) (Spring): 326-333.
    Holderness, C. G., and D. P. Sheehan. 1988. The role of majority shareholders in publicly held corporations: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 317-346.
    Holmstrom, B. 1979. Moral hazard and observability. The Bell Journal of Economics 10 (1): 74-91.
    Hurwitz, J. 2002. The linkage between Management practices, intangible performances and stock returns. Journal of Intellectual Capital 3 (1): 51-61.
    Ittner, C. D. and D. F. Larcker. 1997. Quality strategy, strategic control systems, and organizational performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society 22: 293-314.
    Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and M. V. Rajan. 1997. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review 72: 231-255.
    Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators offinancial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36: 1-35.
    Jelinek, M. and, C. B. Schoonhoven. 1993. The innovation marathon: Lessons from high technology firms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior-agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial and Economics 3: 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98 (2): 225-264.
    Kaplan, R. and D. Norton. 1992. The balanced-scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review (January-February): 71-79.
    Kelley, D. J. and M. P. Rice. 2002. Advantage beyond founding the strategic use of technologies. Journal of Business Venturing. 17: 41-57.
    Kevin J. Sigler and J. P. Haley. 1995. CEO pay and company performance. Managerial Finance. 21 (2): 31-41.
    Lambert, R. A. and D. F. Larcker. 1987. An analysis of the use of accounting and
    market measures of performance in executive compensation contrasts. Journal of Accounting Research 2: 585-125.
    Lambert, R., D. Larcker, and K. Weigelt. 1993. The structure of organizational incentives. Administrative Science Quarterly. 38: 438-461.
    Lambert, R. A. 1993. The use of accounting and security price measures of performance in managerial compensation contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 101-123.
    Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis. 1996. The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 21: 107-138.
    Megna, P. and M. Klock. 1993. The impact of intangible capital on Tobin`s q in the semiconductor industry. American Economic Review. 83 (2) (May): 265-269.
    Miller, J. S., R. M. Wiseman, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia. 2002. The fit between CEO compensation design and firm risk. Academy of Management Journal 45 (4): 745-756.
    Narin, F., E. Noma, R. Perry. 1987. Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy 16 (2-4): 143-155.
    Nordhaus, W. 1969. An economics theory of technological changes. American Economics Review 59 (2): 18-28.
    Pandit, S., C. E. Wasley, and T. Zach. 2011. The effect of research and development (R&D) inputs and outputs on the relation between the uncertainty of future operating performance and R&D expenditures. Journalof Accounting, Auditing and Finance 26 (1): 121-144.
    Pakes, A. 1985. On patents, R&D, and the stock market rate of return. The Journal of Political Economics 93: 390-409.
    Prendergast, C. 2000. What trade-off of risk and incentives? American Economic Review 90 (2): 421-425.
    Rappaport, A. 1986. Creating Shareholder Value. New York: Free Press.
    Roos, J., G. Roos , N. C. Dragonetti, and L. Edvinsson. 1997. Intellectual capital: navigating in new business landscape. NY:New York University Press.
    Rosen, S. 1982. Authority, control and the distribution of earnings. Bell Journal of Economics 13: 311-323.
    Roslender, R. 2000. Accounting for intellectual capital: A contemporarymanagement accounting perspective. Management Accounting 78 (March): 34-37.
    Scherer, F. M. 1965. Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. The American Economic Review 55(5): 1097-1125.
    Schoenecker, T. and L. Swanson. 2002. Indicators of firm technological capability: validity and performance implications. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management 49( 1) (February): 36-44.
    Shane, H. 1993. Patent citations as an indicator of the value of intangible assets in the semiconductor industry. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
    Shaw, K. W. and M. H. Zhang. 2010. Is CEO cash compensation punished for poor firm performance? The Accounting Review 85 (3): 1065–1093.
    Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny. 1997. A survey of corporate governance. Journal of
    finance (June): 737-783.
    Sloan, R. G. 1993. Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 55-100.
    Smith, C. W. and R. L. Watts. 1992. The investment opportunity set, corporatefinancing, dividend, and financing policies. Journal of Financial Economics 32: 262-292.
    Sridharan, U. V. 1996. CEO influence and executive compensation. The Financial Review 31 (Febuary): 51-66.
    Stolpe, M. 2002. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: The Case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy 31: 1181-1198.
    Trajtenberg, M. 1990. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics 21: 172-187.
    Trajtenberg, M., A. B. J. R. Henderson. 1997. University versus corporate patents: a window on the basicness of Invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 5 (1): 19-50.
    Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman 1991. Loss aversion in riskless choice: A reference dependent model. Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (4): 1039-1061.
    Walsh, J. P. and J. K. Seward. 1990. On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control Mechanisms. Academy of Management Review 15: 421-458.
    Warner, J., R. J. Watts, and K. H. Wruck. 1988. Stock price and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 461-492.
    Watts, R. and J. L. Zimmerman. 1978. Towards a positive theory of the determination accounting standard. Accounting Review 53: 112-129.
    Ziedonis, R. H. and B. H. Hall. 2001. The effects of strengthening patent rights on firms engaged in cumulative innovation : Insights from the semiconductor industry. Working Paper.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    101353007
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1013530072
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    007201.pdf656KbAdobe PDF2233View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback