English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 92604/122928 (75%)
Visitors : 26801344      Online Users : 424
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/67930


    Title: 從新自由制度主義分析中日韓三邊經貿合作(2008-2013)
    China-Japan-South Korea Trilateral Economic and Trade Cooperation: A Neoliberal Institutionalist Perspective
    Authors: 黃聖惠
    Huang, Sheng Hui
    Contributors: 黃奎博
    Huang, Kwei Bo
    黃聖惠
    Huang, Sheng Hui
    Keywords: 新自由制度主義
    中國
    日本
    韓國
    中日韓自由貿易區
    國際合作
    國際制度
    Neo-institutionalism
    Neoliberalism
    China
    Japan
    South Korea
    CJK FTA
    North East Asia
    International cooperation
    International institution
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-07-29 16:17:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 近年來,全球經貿活動因WTO下的多邊架構談判停滯不前而暫時走向區域化;加上金融危機後的東亞地區需要穩定的區域經濟,促使中國、日本與韓國三國之間萌生經貿合作的構想並逐漸制度化。本研究從新自由制度主義論述下,國際制度的功能以及無霸權存在的國際合作兩方面來分析並理解中日韓經貿合作的發展過程。三國各政府層級透過數次的正式、非正式及例行性會議安排,進行相互了解、匯集共識,逐步建立起互利互惠的具體合作安排。相關作為例如舉行中日韓高峰會、設置中日韓三國合作秘書處,並簽署中日韓投資協定與中日韓自由貿易區的共同研究和談判。

    本論文依新自由制度主義理論架構研究得出,國際制度的功能性是促使中日韓之間經貿合作逐步走向正式制度安排的主要因素;此外,三國間的經貿合作是國家基於追求共同利益的理性行為,其中不存在霸權國來主導三國的經貿合作。
    Since the multilateral free trade negotiation under the WTO forum has been bogging down, States temporarily shift their free-trade policies to regional or bilateral FTA building. In addition, lessons learned from Asia economic and financial crisis make known that there’s a demand for stable regional circumstance in Northeast Asia. Accordingly, China, Japan and South Korea start their economic and trade cooperation under a trilateral framework. The governments of China, Japan and South Korea build mutual understanding and reach consensuses via lots of formal and informal meetings. As a result, in view of mutual interests and reciprocity, a trilateral economic and trade cooperation has been progressively constructed.

    This study based on the point of view from neo-institutionalism, arguing that the development of economic and trade cooperation among China, Japan, and South Korea is due to their rational behavior on pursuing mutual and shared interests. With the help of the functions of the international institutions, China-Japan-South Korea trilateral economic and trade cooperation could be gradually realized in North East Asia, without no presence of a regional hegemony.
    Reference: 一、英文文獻

    官方文件

    “Action Plan for Promoting Trilateral Cooperation,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://file.tcs-asia.org/file_manager/files/tcs/1.%20Basic%20Documents/1.%20English/(2008.12.13)Action%20Plan%20for%20Promoting%20Trilateral%20Cooperation.pdf>(accessed on 14 April, 2014).
    “Agreement among the Three Governments for the Promotion Facilitation and Protection of Investment,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://en.tcs-asia.org/dnb/board/view.php?board_name=3_2_1_trade&view_id=104&search_cate=Negotiations+for+the+Trilateral+Investment+Agreement>(accessed on 14 April, 2014).
    “Booklet of the General Introduction to the Trilateral Economic Relations,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat <http://file.tcs-asia.org/file_manager/files/tcs/Others/(2013.09.06)%20Booklet%20of%20General%20Information%20to%20Trilateral%20Economic%20Relations.pdf>(accessed on 06 February, 2014).
    “Japan-China-ROK Trilateral Summit Joint Statement on the International Finance and Economy,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://file.tcs-asia.org/file_manager/files/tcs/3.%20Politics%20and%20Security/1.%20English/1.%20Politics/(2008.12.13)Joint%20Statement%20on%20the%20International%20Finance%20and%20Economy.pdf> (accessed on 19 January, 2013).“Joint Study Report for an FTA among China, Japan and Korea” MOFA of Japan, <http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/release/24/3/pdfs/0330_10_01.pdf>(accessed on 06 January, 2014).
    “Report of General Introduction to Trilateral Economic Relation,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://file.tcs-asia.org/file_manager/files/tcs/Others/(2013)%20Report%20of%20General%20Introduction%20to%20Trilateral%20Economic%20Relations.pdf>(accessed on 10 April, 2014).
    “Trilateral Cooperation Vision 2020,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://file.tcs-asia.org/file_manager/files/tcs/1.%20Basic%20Documents/1.%20English/(2010.05.29)Trilateral%20Cooperation%20VISION%202020.pdf> (accessed on 14 April, 2014) .
    “Trilateral Economic Report,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://file.tcs-asia.org/file_manager/files/tcs/Others/(2013.09.12)%20Trilateral%20Economic%20Report.pdf> (accessed on 03 April, 2014).

    專書

    Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation (New York: Basic Books, 2006).
    Baldwin, David, Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993).
    Friedman, Edward and Kim, Sung-Chull, Regional Cooperation and Its Enemies in Northeast Asia: The Impact of Domestic Forces (New York: Routledge, 2006).
    Goldstein, Judith and Keohane, Robert O., Ideas and Foreign Politicy: Beliefs, Institutions, and Political Change (New York: Cornell University Press, 1993).
    Grieco, Joseph M., Cooperation among Nations: Europe, America, and Nontariff Barriers to Trade (New York: Cornell University Press, 1990).
    Grubel, H. and P. Lloyd, Intra-Industry Trade: Theory and Measurement of International Trade in Differentiated Products (New York: Wiley, 1975).
    Hasenclever, Andreas, Mayer, Peter and Rittberger, Volker, Theories of International Regimes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).
    Keohane, Robert O., After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1984).
    Keohane, Robert O., International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory (Boulder, Colo: Westview Press, 1989).
    Keohane, Robert O., Power and Governance in a Partially Globalized World (London: Routledge, 2002).
    Keohane, Robert O. and Nye, Joseph S., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, (Boston: Little Brown, 1977).
    Krasner, Stephen D., International Regimes (New York: Cornell University Press, 1983).
    Lebow, Richard Ned, Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981).
    Lim, Hank and Lee, Chyungly, The Emerging North-South Devid in East Asia (Singapore: Eastern Universities Press, 2004).
    Lowe, John, The Concert of Europe: International relations 1814-70 (London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1990).
    Milner, Helen V., Interests, Institutions and Information: Domestic Politics and International Relations, (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1997).
    Oye, Kenneth A., Cooperation under Anarchy (New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1986).
    Park, Jong-Chul , King, Hak-Sung and Kim, Sung-Chull, Infrastructure of Regional Cooperation in Northeast Asia: Current Status and Tasks (Seoul: KINU, 2005).
    Ruggie, John G., Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization (New York: Routledge, 1998).
    Snyder, Glenn H., and Paul Diesing, Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structrue in International Crises (Princeton: Princeton University press, 1977).
    Stein, Arthur A., Why Nations Cooperate? Circumstance and Choice in International Relations (New York: Cornell University Press, 1990).
    Viotti, Paul R. and Kauppi, Mark V., International Relations Theory (New York: Pearson Education, 2010).
    Waltz, Kenneth, Man, the State and War (New York: Columba University Press, 1959).

    期刊

    Aggarwal, Vinod K. and Koo, Min-Gyo, “Beyond Network Power? The Dynamics of Formal Economic Integration in Northeast Asia,” Pacific Review, Vol. 18, No. 2(2005), pp. 189-216.
    Ahn, Byung-Joon, “The Rise of China and the Future of East Asian Integration,” Asia-Pacific Review, Vol. 11, No. 2(2004), pp. 18-35.
    Andreatta, Filippo, and Koenia-Archibugi, Mathias,“Which Synthesis? Strategies of Theoretical Integration and the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International Political Science Review, Vol. 31, No. 2(2010), pp. 207-227.
    Ashizawa, Kuniko, “Japan's Approach toward Asian Regional Security: From 'Hub-and-Spoke' Bilateralism to 'Multi-Tiered',” The Pacific Review, Vol. 16, No. 3(2003), pp. 361-382.
    Axelrod, Robert, “The Emergence of Cooperation among Egoists,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 75, No. 2(1981), pp. 306-318.
    Caporaso, James, “International Relations Theory and Multilateralism: The Search for Foundations,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 3(Summer 1992), pp. 599-632.
    Cai, Kevin G., “Is a Free Trade Zone Emerging in Northeast Asia in the Wake of the Asian Financial Crisis?,” Pacific Affairs, Vol. 74, No. 1(2001), pp. 7-24.
    Chiang, Min-Hua, “The Potential of China-Japan-South Korea Free Trade Agreement,” East Asia, Vol. 30, No. 3(September 2013), pp. 199-216.
    Jervis, Robert, “Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation ” International Security, Vol. 24, No. 1(1999), pp. 42-63.
    Keohane, Robert O. and Martin, Lisa, “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security, Vol. 20, No. 1(1995), pp. 39-51.
    Lipson, Charles, “International Cooperation in Economic and Security Affairs,” World Politics, Vol. 37, No. 1(1984), pp. 1-23.
    Lyou, Byung-Woon, “Building the Northeast Asian Community,” Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2(2004), pp. 257-310.
    Milner, Helen, “International Theories of Cooperation among Nations,” World Politics, Vol. 44, No. 3(1992), pp. 466-496.
    Moon, Hwy-chang, “Cooperate with Japan and China,” Korea Focus, Vol. 15, No. 3(2007), pp. 32-33.
    Pemp, T. J., “Soft Balancing, Hedging, and Institutional Darwinism: The Economic-Security Nexus and East Asian Regionalism,” East Asian Studies, Vol. 10, No. 2(2010), pp. 209-238.
    Pempel, T. J., “Northeast Asian Economic Integration: A Region in Flux,” Asia-Pacific Review, Vol. 14, No. 2(2007), pp. 45-61.
    Powell, Robert, “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory ” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 4(1991), pp. 1303-1320.
    Ruggie, John G., Katzenstein, Peter J., Keohane, Robert O. and Schmitte, Philippe C., “Transformations in World Politics: The Intellectual Contributions of Ernst B. Haas,” Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 8(June 2005), pp. 271-296.
    Sato, Momoko, “Old Actors Reconfigured: Crisis and Northeast Asia,” The SAIS Review of International Affairs, Vol. 29, No. 2(2009), pp. 107-108.
    Simon, Herbert A., “Rationality as Process And as Product of Though” American Economic Review, Vol. 68, No. 2(1978), pp. 1-16.
    Snidal, Duncan, “Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 3(1991), pp. 701-726.
    Stubbs, Richard, “ASEAN Plus Three. Emerging East Asian Regionalism?,” Asian Survey, Vol. 42, No. 3(2002), pp. 440-455.
    Vio, José Guerra, “Institutionalizing East Asia: South Korea’s Regional Leadership as a Middle Power,” PEAR, Vol. 4, No. 1(SPRING/SUMMER 2012), pp. 43-66.
    Yoshimatsu, Hidetaka, “From Distrust to Mutual Interests?: Emerging Cooperation in Northeast Asia,” East Asia: An International Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 4(2005), pp. 18-38.

    會議論文

    Lee, Hochul, “Balance of Power and Economic Interdependence in the Post-Cold War
    Northeast Asia International Relational: An Empirical Study,” APSA Annual Meeting (Boston: American Political Science Association, August 28- September 1, 2002), pp.1-24.

    網路資料

    “China, Japan, South Korea Trilateral Cooperation: Implications for Northeast Asian Politics and Order,” EAI Issue Briefing <http://www.eai.or.kr/type/panelView.asp?bytag=p&catcode=&code=eng_report&idx=11660&page=1>(accessed on 26 February, 2014).“Evolution of Regional Trade Agreements in the World, 1948-2013,” Regional Trade Agreements: Facts and figures, <http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/regfac_e.htm>(accessed on 03 January, 2014).
    “FTA Status of ROK,” Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Republic of Korea, <http://www.mofa.go.kr/ENG/policy/fta/status/overview/index.jsp?menu=m_20_80_10&tabmenu=t_1>(accessed on 17 March, 2014).
    “Functions and Activities,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat, <http://en.tcs-asia.org/dnb/user/userpage.php?lpage=1_4_objective>(accessed on 14 April, 2014)
    “Trade and Investment,” Trilateral Cooperation Secretariat <http://en.tcs-asia.org/dnb/board/list.php?board_name=3_2_1_trade>(accessed on 22 March, 2014). “Japan’s FTA Strategy and a Free Trade Area of Asia Pacific,” The Pacific Economic Cooperation Council & The APEC Business Advisory Council, <http://www.apec.org.au/docs/061120_ftaap.pdf#page=71>(accessed on 13 March, 2014).
    UNCTADSTAT, <http://unctadstat.unctad.org/TableViewer/tableView.aspx>(accessed on 08 August, 2014).

    二、中文文獻

    官方文件

    「博鰲亞洲論壇亞洲經濟一體化進程2013年度報告」,博鰲亞洲論壇,<http://www.boaoforum.org/xzzx/6682.jhtml>(檢閱日期:2014年01月03日)。

    專書

    朱雲漢,從國際關係理論看中國崛起(台北:五南出版社,2007年)。
    秦熠群,中日韓自由貿易區對中國貿易和產業影響的實證研究(北京:人民出版社,2006年)。
    張光華,消逝中的美國霸權(台北:商訊文化,2010年)。
    張彬、劉晨陽,中日韓自由貿易區問題研究(北京:人民出版社,2013年)。
    陳德昇,台韓商競合、韓中與大陸市場FTA機會與挑戰(新北市:印刻文學,2012年)。
    黃大慧,建構和諧東亞:中日韓關係與東亞未來(北京:社會科學文獻出版社,2010年)。

    期刊

    中華台北APEC研究中心,「第18屆APEC經濟領袖宣言」,APEC通訊,第134期(2010年11月),頁2-6。
    李隆生,「以東協為軸心的東亞經濟整合:從區域主義到全球化?」,亞太研究論壇,第33期(2006年9月),頁101-124。
    吳玲君,「中國推動東北亞自由貿易區策略:機會與意願的研究途徑」,遠景基金會季刊,第13卷第2期(2012年4月),頁143-181。
    許峻賓,「亞太區域經濟整合與區域國際政治關係」,台灣經濟研究月刊,第36卷第7期(2013年7月),頁35-41。
    劉麗惠,「中日韓政權轉移牽動亞洲經貿格局」,貿易雜誌,第264期(2013年6月),頁14-18。
    鄭端耀,「國際關係『新自由制度主義』理論之評析」,問題與研究,第36卷第12期(1997年12月),頁1-22。

    會議論文

    孫國祥,「區域主義與多邊主義的介面:跨太平洋伙伴之探討」,發表於第九屆全球戰略與台海安全學術研討會(中興大學:中興大學國際政治研究所、全球和平與戰略研究中心主辦,2011年11月4日)。

    網路資料

    林建山,「中日韓三國北京協定對臺灣經濟的重要影響」,陸資來台服務網,<http://iitw.cnfi.org.tw/all-module03.php?id=77&t_type=s>(檢閱日期:2013年12月08日)。
    曾復生,「習近平的國際戰略布局」,國家政策研究基金會,<http://www.npf.org.tw/post/3/13088y/>(檢閱日期:2014年02月15日)。
    劉德海,「日本自由貿易協定策略之研究成果報告」,<http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/bitstream/140.119/4197/1/942414H004019.pdf> (檢閱日期:2013年10月12日)。
    譚瑾瑜,「亞太經濟局勢分析」,國家政策研究基金會,
    <http://www.npf.org.tw/post/2/6821>(檢閱日期:2014年02月15日)。
    「中日韓三國經濟合作體發展階段性方案」,中國網,<http://big5.china.com.cn/chinese/zhuanti/beijingforum/651927.htm> (檢閱日期:2014年07月07日)。
    「《中日韓合作(1999-2012)》白皮書」,新華網,<http://big5.xinhuanet.com/gate/big5/news.xinhuanet.com/world/2012-05/09/c_111919576.htm>(檢閱日期:2013年12月09日)。
    「中日韓開啟第四輪FTA談判」,央視網,<http://jingji.cntv.cn/2014/03/04/ARTI1393891908816666.shtml>(檢閱日期:2014年07月07日)。
    「中日韓開啟第四輪FTA談判 聚焦多個領域」,台灣服務業聯盟,<http://www.twcsi.org.tw/multi_detail.php?Iid=2039>(檢閱日期:2014年07月07日)。
    「中日韓經貿論壇呼籲三國加速自貿談判」,環球網,<http://big5.cri.cn/gate/big5/gb.cri.cn/44571/2014/04/14/3925s4502799.htm>(檢閱日期:2014年06月10日)。
    「中日韓論壇呼加速自貿區談判」,中國評論新聞網,<http://mag.chinareviewnews.com/doc/1031/2/7/1/103127168.html?coluid=35&kindid=612&docid=103127168>(檢閱日期:2014年06月10日)。
    「中共十八大政治報告」,中國評論新聞網,<http://hk.crntt.com/doc/1022/9/7/7/102297778.html?coluid=7&kindid=0&docid=102297778&mdate=1109103500>(檢閱日期:2014年04月16日)。
    「中國大陸、日本、韓國自由貿易區第二輪談判今開啟,三方仍在摸底」,經濟部經貿談判代表辦公室,<http://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/otn/content/Content.aspx?menu_id=8641> (檢閱日期:2014年07月07日)。
    「中韓自貿談判能否破局東北亞三國演義」,新浪新聞,<http://news.sina.com.tw/article/20140611/12647773.htm>(檢閱日期:2014年07月06日)。
    「釣島爭議迫使中日韓推遲首腦會晤」,BBC中文網,<http://www.bbc.co.uk/zhongwen/trad/world/2013/04/130417_japan_korea_china.shtml>(檢閱日期:2014年04月17日)。
    「外交部亞洲司副司長楊健談中日韓合作前景」,中華人民共和國外交部,<http://big5.fmprc.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/gjhdq_603914/gjhdqzz_609676/zrhhz_610230/xgxw_610236/t921056.shtml>(檢閱日期:2014年02月07日)。
    「韓中日經濟統合 台灣被疏遠」,中央社新聞網, <http://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/201405170284-1.aspx > (檢閱日期:2014年07月17日)。
    「東協發展簡介」,台灣東南亞國家協會研究中心,<http://www.aseancenter.org.tw/ASEANintro.aspx>(檢閱日期:2014年04月10日)。
    「胡錦濤說:中國的發展離不開亞洲,亞洲的發展」,亞太日報,<http://www.apdnews.com/asia/seasia/2012/0904/10521.shtml>(檢閱日期:2014年02月15日)。
    「專家訪談:中國經濟轉型為中日互利合作打開廣闊空間」,國際日報,<http://www.chinesetoday.com/big/article/891002>(檢閱日期:2014年07月06日)。

    三、日文文獻

    官方文件

    「日中韓FTA産官学共同研究共同声明」,日本外務省,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/press/release/23/12/pdfs/1216_05_01.pdf>(檢閱日期:2014年01月16日)。
    「外交青書」,日本外務省,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/page22_000586.html>(檢閱日期:2014年04月18日)。

    期刊

    中島朋義,「日本国際経済学会第70回全国大会メモランダム」,世界経済評論,第56卷第2期(2012年3/4月),頁49-54。
    石田信隆,「日中韓と農業」,農林金融,第65卷第12期(2012年12月),頁2-18。
    岡部直明,「TPPと東アジアの結合目指せ」,海外事情,第60卷第4期(2012年4月),頁93-103。
    河合正弘,「アジア圏市場の成長展望と日本の課題」,世界経済評論,第56卷第4期(2012年7/8月),頁6-28。
    馬田啓一,「TPPとアジア太平洋の新通商秩序」,世界経済評論,第57卷第5期(2013年9/10月),頁29-34。
    唱新,「東アジア貿易構造の変化とRCEPの可能性」,世界経済評論,第57卷第3期(2013年5/6月),頁53-58。

    網路資料

    川崎研一,「EPAの優先順位:経済効果の大きい貿易相手は?」,経済産業研究所,<http://www.rieti.go.jp/jp/columns/a01_0318.html>(檢閱日期:2014年03月06日)。
    浦田秀次郎,「日本のFTA 戦略」,財務省財務総合政策研究所,<http://www.mof.go.jp/pri/publication/financial_review/fr_list5/r81/r_81_027_049.pdf>(檢閱日期:2014年02月28日)。
    「日中韓FTA」,日本外務省,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/fta/j-jck/index.html>(檢閱日期:2014年03月07日)。
    「日本のFTA戦略」,日本外務省,<http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/fta/senryaku.html>(檢閱日期:2014年03月02日)。
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    外交研究所
    99253012
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0099253012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[外交學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    301201.pdf2342KbAdobe PDF349View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback