English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89327/119107 (75%)
Visitors : 23848775      Online Users : 210
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 財務管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/68231
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68231


    Title: 合理性意見書是否具有資訊意涵?-以台灣上市公司併購案為例
    Does Fairness Opinion Contain Useful Information? - The cases of M&A in Taiwan
    Authors: 林宇軒
    Contributors: 岳夢蘭
    林宇軒
    Keywords: 獨立專家
    認證效果
    事件研究法
    併購綜效
    Independent expert
    Certification effect
    Event study
    M&A synergy
    Date: 2013
    Issue Date: 2014-08-06 11:40:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究以2002年至2012年台灣主併公司為上市公司的併購案件為樣本,探討合理性意見書評價內容和主併公司短期股價影響及併購後綜效之關聯性。研究結果發現,於意見書揭露日時,若獨立專家評估價格高於雙方約定交易價格愈多時,即評價溢酬愈大,或是評價報告由高聲譽獨立專家所出具,主併公司會有正向的累積異常報酬率;且在此情況下,主併公司併購後綜效亦會愈大。故本研究認為,合理性意見書中的評價資訊,於揭露時具有訊號發射效果,可以幫助外部股東及投資人判斷交易是否對其有利,降低內外資訊不對稱,同時亦具有認證併購後公司會產生合併綜效之功能。因此,併購時獨立專家所出具之合理性意見書確實具有資訊意涵。
    This study analyses the relation between target firm valuations disclosed in the fairness opinions and acquiring firm performances by using the samples of Taiwanese listed company in M&A transaction between 2002 and 2012. We find that the stock price reactions to the public disclosure of fairness opinions are positively related to the difference between target firms valuations contained in the fairness opinion and the merger offer price and the reputation of independent experts. Under these conditions, the synergy in the M&A may be higher than others. Therefore, we suggest that the information contained in the fairness opinions can not only reduce information asymmetry between management and stockholders, but also certify that the M&A transaction will produce synergy. We conclude that fairness opinion does contain useful information to market participants.
    Reference: 林嬋娟、吳安妮(1992),台灣企業併購綜效及績效之實證研究,會計評論,第26期(4月),1-23。

    孫梅瑞、陳隆麒(2002),台灣地區上市公司從事併購活動對經營績效影響之研究,中山管理評論,第10卷第1期,155-184。

    孫梅瑞、陳雅君(2010),公司融資決策與併購績效關聯性之研究,商略學報,第2卷第3期,199-215。

    陳傳毅(2010),企業併購交易中獨立專家意見之功能與法律責任,東吳大學法律學系碩士在職專班法律專業組碩士論文。

    陳楷仁(2011),企業併購法第六條獨立專家相關問題之研析,國立臺北大學法律學系碩士論文。

    黃玉雯(2012),併購獨立專家之選擇及併購後綜效之探討,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。

    Bowers, H. M. (2002). Fairness opinions and the business judgment rule: an empirical investigation of target firms' use of fairness opinions. Northwestern University Law Review, 96, 567–578.

    Bowers, H. M., & Latham, W. R. (2004). Value of Fairness Opinions in US Mergers and Acquisitions,1980-2003. Working Paper, University of Delaware.

    Brickley, J. A., Lease, R. C., & Smith Jr, C. W. (1988). Ownership structure and voting on antitakeover amendments. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(0), 267-291.

    Cain, M. D., & Denis, D. J. (2013). Information production by investment banks: evidence from fairness opinions. Journal of Law and Economics, 56(1), 245-280.

    Carney, W. J. (1992). Fairness opinions: How fair are they and why we should do nothing about it. Washington University Law Quarterly, 70, 523.

    Chen, K. Y., & Wu, S.-Y. (2002). The effect of industry specialization on audit fees in Taiwan: The role of industry type. Working Paper. National Cheng Kung University.

    Chen, L. H., & Sami, H. (2010). Does the Use of Fairness Opinions Impair the Acquirers' Abnormal Returns? The Litigation Risk Effect. Advances in Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management, 4, 81-112.
    Elson, C. M. (1992). Fairness opinions: Are they fair or should we care? Ohio State Law Journal, 53, 951-970.

    Fama, E. F. (1970). Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work. The Journal of Finance, 25(2), 383-417.

    Francis, J. R., & Wilson, E. R. (1988). Auditor Changes: A Joint Test of Theories Relating to Agency Costs and Auditor Differentiation. The Accounting Review, 63(4), 663-682.

    Hudson, C. D., Jahera, J. S., Jr., & Lloyd, W. P. (1992). Further Evidence on the Relationship Between Ownership and Performance. The Financial Review, 27(2), 227.

    Kisgen, D. J., Qian, J. Q., & Song, W. (2009). Are fairness opinions fair? The case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Financial Economics, 91(2), 179-207.

    Klein, B., & Leffler, K. B. (1981). The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance. Journal of Political Economy, 89(4), 615.

    Liu, T. (2013). The Bidder's Choice of a Fairness Opinion in Mergers and Acquisitions: The Impact on Value Creation. Working Paper.

    Makhija, A. K., & Narayanan, R. P. (2007). Fairness Opinions in Mergers and Acquisitions. Working Paper.

    Mayhew, B. W., & Wilkins, M. S. (2003). Audit Firm Industry Specialization as a Differentiation Strategy: Evidence from Fees Charged to Firms Going Public. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2), 33-52.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財務管理研究所
    101357005
    102
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0101357005
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[財務管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    700501.pdf1878KbAdobe PDF25View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback