政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/68600
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109953/140902 (78%)
造访人次 : 46058235      在线人数 : 1255
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/68600


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68600


    题名: 定型化契約條款內容控制的問題導向論證
    其它题名: The Problem-Oriented Argument in Judicial Review of the Provisions in the Pre-Formulated Standard Contracts
    作者: 許政賢
    Hsu, Cheng-Hsien
    贡献者: 法律系
    关键词: 定型化契約;內容控制;問題導向;類觀點學;概括條款;誠信原則;信用卡條款;循環利息
    pre-formulated standard contracts;judicial review;problem-oriented argument;topic argument;general clause;principle of good faith;credit card terms;revolving interests
    日期: 2013-10
    上传时间: 2014-08-12 14:50:07 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在20世紀中葉以後，法學界針對傳統方法論的不足，陸續嘗試突破傳統架構的侷限。由Viehweg引發高度重視的類觀點學，到Alexy具有重要影響的論證理論，逐步建構多元的方法系譜。尤其就概括條款的具體化過程，連傳統方法論名家仍須承認，此時法官必須進行評價以補充框架內涵，如單純以法律或立法者的價值決定，並無法作成裁判。我國消保法第12條有關消費性定型化契約條款的內容控制，由於涉及概括條款的具體化問題，學理上認為係立法者授權法官填補空白，多承認其準立法性質，而須考量法政策層面問題。換言之，消保法第12條係立法者授權法官，於個案中發展具體規範的典型概括條款，但由於依該條所為內容控制無法以傳統涵攝模式進行，而應依具體事實、條件、社會情境進行價值選擇，就此而言，不得不承認法官仍具有一定的裁量空間。而在上述法律適用過程中，既無法以演繹方式推導出結論，此時替代方法－例如：問題導向思考－往往就有填補傳統方法不足的空間。實務上曾有引發輿論重視的案例，其中所涉不同審級法院的判決，在風格、結論上均形成強烈對比，依本文分析，其中涉及新論證方法與傳統解釋方法的對立，或涉及在運用體系架構論述的實務判決中，如何融入問題導向的思維方式。由本文所討論的案例顯示，在歐陸法系重視體系架構及理論的國家，至少就概括條款的具體化方面，在方法上應持開放立場，承認並融入類觀點學以個案問題為討論中心的靈活方法，較能兼顧法律規範的合法性及個案正義的正當性。
    The problems and limitations of legal methodology have provoked enthusiastic discussions since the second half of the last century. These discussions are based on the assumption that the so-called traditional methods of legal interpretation can not provide enough pragmatic and reliable tools in dealing with certain intractable problems, such as judicial review of the provisions in the pre-formulated standard contracts. In these cases regarding the application of general clauses, it is well recognized that the judge was authorized to supplement specific contents of legal texts. In fact, some abstract legal concepts, such as the principle of good faith or unfair, can not be determined by means of the subsumption. It is no wonder such discussions have not yet come to the end. However, it is also evident that there is no definite alternative model or solution for this problem that are widely accepted so far. Under such circumstances, some argued that the problem-oriented argument should at least be one of the alternative or complementary models for the system-based argument which the majority of court decisions are accustomed to apply. In this article, the background of some controversial topics in legal methodology has been introduced briefly and a problem-oriented argument is also recommended in order to promote the connection between the legal conceptions and social facts. It is also argued that the main duty of a lawyer is not searching for a simple and pure theory, but fulfilling social responsibility. If we take this advice under serious consideration, it is clear that there can be no achievement without sacrifice. Besides, it is always the facts that we have to face in the eternal pursuit of the balance between rules and justice in any legal case.
    關聯: 東吳法律學報, 25(2), 51-86
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    5186.pdf1544KbAdobe PDF2607检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈