English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 87250/116203 (75%)
Visitors : 23278791      Online Users : 470
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/68809


    Title: 「一個中國」原則的戰略性思考
    Other Titles: Strategic Review on the “One China” Principle
    Authors: 童振源
    Tung, Chen-yuan
    Contributors: 國發所
    Keywords: 一個中國;臺獨;國統綱領;陳水扁;民進黨
    One China;Taiwan independence;National Unification Guidelines;Chen Shui-bian;Democratic Progressive Party
    Date: 2001-01
    Issue Date: 2014-08-18 13:53:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 臺灣各政黨、主要政治領袖對於臺灣「目前」的國家定位已有高度的共識。中華民國政府的合法性來自臺灣人民的授權;在國際上,代表臺灣的中華民國是一個主權獨立的國家,與代表大陸的中華人民共和國並存、互不管轄;在兩岸關係定位上,臺灣也願意與中國大陸務實地協商,尋找可行、而且雙方都可以接受的互動模式。對於臺灣「未來」的國家定位,臺灣各政黨、主要政治領袖也都強調以「民主」作為決定臺灣前途與兩岸關係的最後準則。但是民進黨的表述方式卻缺乏邏輯的一貫性,因此造成臺灣在戰略上的重大錯誤。諷刺的是,《國統綱領》雖然有所謂的「預設統一」之立場,但是卻為臺灣在兩岸問題上爭取到更多的自主與談判的時間與空間。
    The major political parties and leaders in Taiwan have a very clear vision, backed by significant consensus, on Taiwan's current national identity. The legitimacy of the Republic of China (ROC) government is authorized solely by the people of Taiwan. With mutually exclusive jurisdictions, the ROC, representing Taiwan as an independent sovereign country, and the People's Republic of China, representing mainland, coexist in international community. Regarding Cross-Strait relations, Taiwan is willing to pragmatically conduct negotiations with China so that both sides can reach feasible and mutually acceptable model for interaction. Regarding Taiwan's future national identity, major political parties and leaders in Taiwan also emphasize that "democracy" is the ultimate criteria to determine Taiwan's future and the Cross-Strait relationship. However, the Democratic Progressive Party itself has no consistent and persuasive expression of Taiwan's national identity and thus makes strategic mistakes that run counter to Taiwan's interests. Ironically, the National Unification Guidelines, embedded with the "pro-unification" stance, has earned more time and space for Taiwan to solidify its autonomy and develop negotiations.
    Relation: 遠景季刊, Vol.2, No.1, pp.127-140
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國家發展研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback