English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 89683/119504 (75%)
Visitors : 23942046      Online Users : 123
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/69013


    Title: 鄰避設施對生活環境品質影響之研究
    Other Titles: The Study of the Impact of NIMBYs on the Quality of Life.
    Authors: 李永展
    Contributors: 地政學系
    Keywords: 鄰避設施;生活環境品質;焚化爐;台北市
    NIMBY;Quality of living environment;Incinerator;Taipei City
    Date: 1994
    Issue Date: 2014-08-20 17:57:36 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的主要在藉由居民對垃圾焚化廠之認知、評價、接受程度、造成影響之感受,以及居民對垃圾焚化廠回饋地方措施之期望及其成效等相關課題之探討,以了解垃圾焚化廠設置形成阻力之原因,此外,並輔以相關文獻、專家意見及相關法規等資訊之整合,嘗試對降低垃圾焚化廠鄰避效果之可行方向提出建議,冀能對減輕日後興建垃圾焚化廠之阻力有所助益,並期能確保民眾之生活環境品質。 本研究之重要成果有以下幾點:(1)民眾對於國內興建垃圾焚化廠之品質及二次汙染控制能力仍缺乏信心;(2)知道內湖垃圾焚化廠之敦親睦鄰及回饋措施與否,會影響受訪者對垃圾焚化廠之接受程度,知道者會較不知道者更願意接受垃圾焚化廠設置在其住家附近;(3)原則上,若垃圾焚化廠之品質值得信賴,則大多數民眾會表示支持的態度,但對於在其居住地區或進而在其住家附近設置此類設施,卻仍持保留之態度;(4)受訪者較願意讓垃圾焚化廠設置在其住家附近之條件調查中得知,大部分民眾較重視風險減輕方案,經濟誘因較不重要;(5)居民預期垃圾焚化廠可能造成之影響通常會較垃圾焚化廠實際產生之影響大;(6)由因果關係分析之結果可得知,垃圾焚化廠對該區健康安全、社會經濟之影響程度愈低,民眾對垃圾焚化廠各項優點之認同感愈高,則民眾對垃圾焚化廠的接受程度愈高;(7)距離內湖垃圾焚化廠愈近之居民,接受該類設施之意願愈低,且對回饋措施之改進需求程度愈高,可見民眾仍視垃圾焚化廠為鄰避設施之一種。 針對上述之研究成果,我們提出三項減輕垃圾焚化廠鄰避效果之可行方向:風險減輕、經濟誘因及適當的資訊回饋。
    The purpose of this study is to examine the cognition, evaluation, acceptance, and impacts of MSW incinerators. In addition, this study explores the reason why residents were against incinerators and residents' expectation toward compensation packages. Furthermore, from the literature review, opinions from experts, and related laws and regulations, this study proposes directions to reduce the NIMBY effects of incinerators, in the hope to reduce the obstacle of siting incinerators, and to attain and enhance the quality of living environment. The major findings of this study are as follows: (1) Residents are concerned with the quality of incinerators and the ability of the government to control the second pollution. (2) Those who are aware of the compensation packages provided by Neihu incinerator will be more willing to accept incinerators located nearby their residents. (3) Basically, people have positive attitudes toward incinerators, so long as the government guarantees high quality of incinerators. However, people are still not willing to accept incinerators "in their backyard". (4) Most people are more concerned with risk reduction strategies than economic incentives. (5) The expectation of the impact of incinerators will be greater than the real one. (6) From the result of causal analyses, the lower the impact of the incinerator to the health, safety, and economy status, implies the higher agreement of people toward the benefits of incinerators, and hence increases the acceptance of incinerators. (7) The closer residents live next to Neihu incinerator, implies the lower willingness to accept the incinerator, and the higher demand of compensation package---people still treat incinerators as NIMBYs. Based on the research findings, this study proposes three approaches to dealing with NIMBY effects of incinerators: risk reduction programs, economic incentives, and proper information feedback systems.
    Relation: 行政院國家科學委員會
    計畫編號NSC83-0301-H004-108
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML701View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback