English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25810959      Online Users : 233
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/70069


    Title: 審議民主在空間議題上的新實驗:以「中港河廊通學步道願景工作坊」爲例
    Other Titles: The Experiment of Deliberative Democracy on Spatial Issue: The Case of "the Scenario Workshop on the Safe Routes to Schools around Chung-Kang Drainage Channel"
    Authors: 杜文苓
    Du, Wen-Ling
    Contributors: 公行系
    Keywords: 公民參與;審議民主;願景工作坊;參與式規劃;新莊中港大排
    citizen participation;deliberative democracy;scenario workshop;participatory planning;Hsin-Chuang Chung-Kang Drainage Channel
    Date: 2009.09
    Issue Date: 2014-09-22 16:32:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 當審議民主碰上空間規劃議題時,其操作方式需要有什麼樣的調整?審議民主與參與式規劃兩個不同的專業領域,又會激盪出哪些發展的可能性?本文以「中港河廊通學步道願景工作坊」-一個結合了審議民主專業以及空間規劃專業的實驗性工作坊為例,思考審議民主會議與空間專業領域跨界合作的可能,以及公民審議在空間議題土的執行問題。透過會議活動的觀察以及與會者會後的深度訪談,我們分析願景工作坊的新設計如何促進公民在空間議題上的溝通審議,其又對現行的審議民主會議以及參與式規劃操作有何啓發。本文分析審議民主與參與式規劃在公民參與設計重點的異同,探求兩個專業領域在碰撞過程中的思考與執行的成果,透過個案分析,進一步思索公民參與空間議題的設計原則與未來方向。
    Once deliberative democracy comes to deal with the spatial planning issues, what is the way to adjust its mode of operation? When the advocates of deliberative democracy come across the participatory planning practitioners, what possibilities can be developed?Taking the example of ”the Scenario Workshop on the Safe Routes to Schools around Chung-Kang Drainage Channel,” an experimental citizen deliberative meeting, this paper explores the potentials of cooperation of two disciplines between deliberative democracy and participatory planning.Through participative observation and in-depth interviews, we examine some innovative elements designed for this scenario workshop and discuss how they enhance the citizen communication and deliberation on spatial issues. This new experiment also sheds light on the current practices of deliberative democracy and participatory planning. By analyzing the similarities and differences of two disciplines, we further ponder on the design principle for citizen to engage in spatial planning issues.
    Relation: 公共行政學報 , 32, 69-104
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    69-104.pdf10634KbAdobe PDF838View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback