English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Items with full text/Total items : 88295/117812 (75%)
Visitors : 23403705      Online Users : 106
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/74849
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/74849


    Title: 嬰幼兒睡眠安排形式:「一心二態」文化意涵的解析
    Other Titles: The Universal and Culture Implication Reflected in the Infant-Child Sleep Arrangement
    Authors: 李美枝;董興邦;陳貽照;楊建銘
    Li, Mei-Chih;Dong, Hsing-Pang;Chen, Yi-Jau;Yang, Chien-Ming
    Contributors: 心理系
    Keywords: 人己界線;自我建構;依附-分離-個體化;親子關係
    attachment-separation-individualization;parent-child relation;self-construal;self-other boundary
    Date: 2010-09
    Issue Date: 2015-04-27 15:56:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 雖然本土心理學已然蔚為一股不容小覷的新興學術潮流,但以追求普遍心理法則為目標的主流心理學者對其偏重特定區域人們之心理與行為之研究頗有微詞。本論文以安排嬰幼兒睡眠的形式為主題,提供一個比較台灣與法國,以及兩個台灣主位(emic)的實徵研究。台灣普遍執行親子共眠而法國普遍執行親子分眠的型態,清楚地彰顯了關係主義文化與個人主義文化對區隔親子界線的顯著差異。研究者藉此文化差異的研究實例,闡述主流心理學之追求普遍性法則與本土心理學偏重主位式法則的殊途目標,實可共構為一心多態(one-mind, many mentalities)的互補學術關係。全世界的孩子,從出生開始就慢慢地進行依附-分離-個體化的普同性歷程。就形體的個體化,舉世相同,但在心理的層面,就因文化價值觀的不同而有分歧的發展,西方偏重分離的導向,華人社會則在依附與分離之間,以關係主義的文化價值觀模糊了人己的界線。相對於西方社會偏重與他人區隔之獨立自我,中國人自我的顯著性在於交融相依的親子關係及其他延伸的人際關係。
    Since 1980 the indigenous psychology has become a hot issue in the countries outside North-America area. However, its emphasis on the psychological study of specific cultures seems to be incompatible with the goal of pursing universal laws of main-stream psychology. In this article, we present three empirical studies about infant-child sleep arrangement: a cross-cultural study between Taiwan and France, and two Taiwan emic studies. The prevalent co-sleep pattern in Taiwan and the prevalent sleep-alone pattern in France clearly reflect the difference of self-other boundary between relationalism and individualism cultures. Based on the results of these three studies, we also clarify the meaning of one-mind many mentalities. In this article it is shown in the divergent development of self-other boundary and self-construal based on the same universal process of attachment-separation-individualization for adapting to norms of different cultures in which a child grows up. All infants in this world are on the same process of attachment-separation-individualization, but in the Western world, the socialization of children emphasizes the aspect of separation and the development of independent self, whereas, in Chinese society, the emphasis of relationalism blurs the parent-child boundary and the development of interdependent self.
    Relation: 中華心理學刊, 52(3), 221-241
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    221-241.pdf2768KbAdobe PDF422View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback