English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 99868/130642 (76%)
Visitors : 37036827      Online Users : 247
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/75801
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/75801

    Title: A comparison of neural responses to appetitive and aversive stimuli in humans and other mammals
    Authors: Northoff, Georg
    Hayes, D.J.
    Duncan, N.W.
    Xu, J.
    Contributors: 心智、大腦與學習研究中心
    Keywords: dopamine;glutamic acid;noradrenalin;4 aminobutyric acid;anterior insula;appetitive stimulus;aversion;aversive stimulus;basolateral amygdala;brain function;comparative study;electroencephalogram;functional magnetic resonance imaging;GABAergic system;human;nerve cell network;nerve potential;neuroanatomy;neuroimaging;neurotransmission;neurotransmitter release;nonhuman;nucleus accumbens;orbital cortex;periaqueductal gray matter;posterior cingulate;premotor cortex;priority journal;review;reward;stimulus;supplementary motor area;ventral tegmentum;ventromedial prefrontal cortex;amygdaloid nucleus;appetite;cell population;cingulate gyrus;corpus striatum;electrophysiology;gustatory cortex;human versus animal comparison;nerve cell;positron emission tomography;primate;Review;rodent;sensory stimulation;stimulus response
    Date: 2014-09
    Issue Date: 2015-06-15 16:17:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Distinguishing potentially harmful or beneficial stimuli is necessary for the self-preservation and well-being of all organisms. This assessment requires the ongoing valuation of environmental stimuli. Despite much work on the processing of aversive- and appetitive-related brain signals, it is not clear to what degree these two processes interact across the brain. To help clarify this issue, this report used a cross-species comparative approach in humans (i.e. meta-analysis of imaging data) and other mammals (i.e. targeted review of functional neuroanatomy in rodents and non-human primates). Human meta-analysis results suggest network components that appear selective for appetitive (e.g. ventromedial prefrontal cortex, ventral tegmental area) or aversive (e.g. cingulate/supplementary motor cortex, periaqueductal grey) processing, or that reflect overlapping (e.g. anterior insula, amygdala) or asymmetrical, i.e. apparently lateralized, activity (e.g. orbitofrontal cortex, ventral striatum). However, a closer look at the known value-related mechanisms from the animal literature suggests that all of these macroanatomical regions are involved in the processing of both appetitive and aversive stimuli. Differential spatiotemporal network dynamics may help explain similarities and differences in appetitive- and aversion-related activity. © 2014.
    Relation: Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 45, 350-368
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.018
    DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.06.018
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    350-368.pdf1754KbAdobe PDF725View/Open

    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

    社群 sharing

    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback