政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/76413
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 109927/140876 (78%)
造访人次 : 45975488      在线人数 : 928
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/76413


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76413


    题名: 薪酬委員會設置對家族企業之影響
    The Impact of Compensation Committee on the Relationship between Family Firms
    作者: 翁郁媚
    Weng, Yu Mei
    贡献者: 戚務君
    翁郁媚
    Weng, Yu Mei
    关键词: 薪酬委員會
    公司價值
    家族企業
    Compensation Committee
    firm value
    family firms
    日期: 2015
    上传时间: 2015-07-13 11:05:50 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 為強化公司治理，我國強制上市(櫃)公司須於2011年底前設置薪酬委員會，本研究首先探討公司自願在2011年底前設置薪酬委員會之因素。因為法令還未強制設置薪酬委員會前，我國已自願設置薪酬委員會之公司約2%，無法使用差異中之差異法(Difference-in-difference)，故本研究以我國家族企業為研究對象，探討相較於非家族企業，薪酬委員會設置對家族企業之公司價值的影響。
    本研究結果顯示產業龍頭公司有設置薪酬委員會、公司規模、股東權益報酬率及董事會之獨立性與自願設置薪酬委員會呈現正相關。另外，家族企業相較於非家族企業而言公司價值較低，設置薪酬委員會後公司價值差距變小，但是未達統計上的顯著，亦即，設置薪酬委員會對家族企業的效益及非家族企業的效益沒有顯著差異。
    In order to enhance corporate governance, the R.O.C. Securities and Exchange Act was amended in 2010 to force listed companies to establish a Compensation Committee by the end of 2011. First, this study is to investigate which determinants may encourage companies to voluntarily establish the compensation committee. Then, we investigate whether setting compensation committee or not can increase firm value in family firms more than non-family firms. Because of few volunteers, we can’t use difference-in-difference.
    The results implicate that voluntary formation of compensation committee is associated with leading enterprise in industry which establishes compensation committee, greater size of the firms, higher return on equity and higher independence of the board of directors. In addition, on comparing Compensation Committees established or not, there appears to be no significant correlation with firm value between family firms and non-family firms.
    參考文獻: 王麗莉，2014，法制化的規範對公司治理之效益探討-以審計及薪酬委員會為例， 私立東吳大學會計學系碩士在職專班論文。
    朱珊慧，2010，薪酬委員會相關法律問題之研究，私立東吳大學法學院法律學系碩士論文。
    李伶珠與劉毅馨，2011，設置薪酬委員會之實務議題，會計研究月刊第308期(7月)：62-66 。
    李建然，1997，影響臺灣上市公司自願性盈餘預測行為因素之研究，國立政治大學會計學系研究所博士論文。
    周行一、陳錦村與陳坤宏，1996，家族企業、聯屬持股與公司價值之研究，中國財務學刊，第四卷第一期：15-139。
    周盈萱，2012，薪酬委員會組成及品質與代理問題之關聯性，國立政治大學會計學系研究所碩士論文。
    林國全，2012，「從強制設置薪酬委員會談起」，月旦法學雜誌，第202期(3 月):22-37。
    林慧真，2008，自願設置審計委員會決定因素之研究，國立成功大學會計系研究所碩士論文。
    張晉源、林有志，2011，企業選擇設置審計委員會之經濟性決定因素，高苑學報第17卷，第2期:55-69。
    黃素慧、黃劭彥、洪嘉聲與林萱霈，2011，公司治理是否能增加我國家族企業之企業價值，經營管理論叢，第7卷，第2期：13-37。
    廖秀梅、李建然、吳祥華，2006，董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究－兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響，東吳經濟商學學報第五十四期(9月):117-160。
    蔡昌憲，2012，「評我國強制設置薪酬委員會之立法政策-從經濟分析及美國金融改革法談起」，中研院法學期刊，第11期:322-323。
    謝易宏，2009，薪甘勤願--簡介美國「薪酬委員會」，月旦民商法雜誌，第26期(12月): 144-170。
    婁天威、洪瑞成、黃啟瑞、駱武昌，淺析美國證管會對上市公司薪酬委員會新規範，證交資料第607期(11月):33。

    Adams, M. 1997. Determinants of audit committee formation in the life insurance industry: New Zealand evidence. Journal of Business Research 38 (2):123-129.
    Adams, R. B. 2005. What do boards do? Evidence from board committee and director compensation data. Evidence from Board Committee and Director Compensation Data (March 13, 2003). EFA.
    Anderson, R. C., and J. M. Bizjak. 2003. An empirical examination of the role of the CEO and the compensation committee in structuring executive pay. Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (7):1323-1348.
    Bebchuk, L. A., and J. M. Fried. 2003. Executive compensation as an agency problem.National Bureau of Economic Research.
    Chen, C.-W., B. Yi, and B. J. Lin. 2013. Does Adoption of Compensation Committee Benefit Shareholders? Evidence from Taiwan. Evidence from Taiwan.
    Chhaochharia, V., and L. Laeven. 2009. Corporate governance norms and practices.Journal of Financial Intermediation 18 (3):405-431.
    Chrisman, J. J., J. H. Chua, and P. Sharma. 2005. Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm.Entrepreneurship theory and practice 29 (5):555-576.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. P. Fan, and L. H. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance 57 (6):2741-2771.
    Collier, P., and A. Gregory. 2000. Audit committee activity and agency costs. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 18 (4):311-332.
    Core, J. E., R. W. Holthausen, and D. F. Larcker. 1999. Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics 51 (3):371-406.
    Daily, C. M., J. L. Johnson, A. E. Ellstrand, and D. R. Dalton. 1998. Compensation committee composition as a determinant of CEO compensation. Academy of Management Journal 41 (2):209-220.
    Jensen, M., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of The Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost, and Capital Structure in Mahoney, JT, 2005, Economic Foundations of Strategy: Sage Publication, London.
    Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure,ownership, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics 38 (2):163-184.
    Morck, R., A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of financial economics 20:293-315.
    Newman, H. A., and H. A. Mozes. 1999. Does the composition of the compensation committee influence CEO compensation practices? Financial management:41-53.
    Pincus, K., M. Rusbarsky, and J. Wong. 1990. Voluntary formation of corporate audit committees among NASDAQ firms. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 8 (4):239-265.
    Pindado, J., I. Requejo, and C. d. l. Torre. 2008. Does family ownership impact positively on firm value? Empirical evidence from Western Europe.
    Sun, J., and S. Cahan. 2009. The effect of compensation committee quality on the association between CEO cash compensation and accounting performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 17 (2):193-207.
    Sun, J., and S. F. Cahan. 2012. The economic determinants of compensation committee quality. Managerial Finance 38 (2):188-205.
    Villalonga, B., and R. Amit. 2006. How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of financial economics 80 (2):385-417.
    Yeh, Y. h., T. s. Lee, and T. Woidtke. 2001. Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan.International Review of finance 2 (1‐2):21-48.
    Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of financial economics 40 (2):185-211.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計研究所
    102353025
    103
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102353025
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    没有与此文件相关的档案.



    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈