English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140903 (78%)
Visitors : 46052021      Online Users : 684
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/76460
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76460


    Title: 前瞻性行為與工作-家庭衝突:邊界理論的應用
    Proactive Behavior and Work-Family Conflict: the perspective of Boundary Theory
    Authors: 陳紀凱
    Chen, Ji Kai
    Contributors: 郭建志
    Kuo, Chien Chih
    陳紀凱
    Chen, Ji Kai
    Keywords: 前瞻性行為
    邊界理論
    邊界強度
    科技使用
    工作-家庭衝突
    proactive behavior
    boundary theory
    boundary strength
    technology use
    work-family conflict
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-07-13 11:14:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在高度競爭的全球化環境下,僅僅被動完成工作指令的員工,已不足以支持組織的生存,因而個體的前瞻性行為,對於組織的重要性與日俱增。然而,過去研究大多只注重前瞻性行為於工作場域的作用,鮮少比較前瞻性行為外溢至不同情境中,可能產生的效果差異。因此,本研究同時將個體的工作場域與家庭場域納入考量,以邊界理論為框架,探討前瞻性行為與工作-家庭衝突的關聯,更進一步提出個體通訊科技產品的使用,以及個體建構的邊界強度可能存在的調節效果。本研究採時間間隔的方式,以問卷調查法施測,共得189份有效樣本,研究結果發現,前瞻性行為外溢至家庭場域中,不僅不會造成更多時間基礎、壓力基礎衝突,還能減少行為基礎衝突的發生,並且在前瞻性行為與時間基礎衝突的關聯上,家庭邊界強度能夠調節科技使用的調節效果,形成三階調節效果,即科技使用對於前瞻性行為與時間基礎衝突的關聯的影響,在個體家庭邊界強度高的狀況下最強。最後,針對本研究之結果進行討論,並說明理論貢獻、管理意涵、研究限制與未來建議。
    Due to highly competitive environment of global economy, employee’s proactive behavior becomes even more critical for organizations’ survival. However, most research focused on the effect of proactive behavior only in workplace, seldom research investigated the possible different effect when proactive behavior spillover to other context, such as family context. As a result, current study applied the theoretical framework of boundary theory, examined the relationship between proactive behavior and work-family conflict, which takes both work and family context into consideration. Our research further proposed the use of communication and information technology and boundary strength constructed by individual as moderator. We conducted time-lag questionnaire survey to test our hypothesis, which generated 189 valid data.
    Contrary to our hypothesis, result showed that proactive behavior did not cause individual to experience more time-based and strain-based conflict, but it even lead individual to experience less behavior-based conflict. Moreover, proactive behavior, technology use and family boundary strength interacted in a way that the strongest moderating effect of technology use between proactive behavior and time-based conflict occured when individuals were high in their family boundary strength, which is a three-way interaction. Based on our findings, we discussed our theoretical contributions, practical implications, limitation and directions for future research.
    Reference: 行政院主計處(2013)。性別專題分析。取自:http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=35734&ctNode=3245&mp=1
    利翠珊、蕭英玲 (2008)。華人婚姻品質的維繫:衝突與忍讓的中介效果。本土心理學研究,29,77-116。
    李良哲 (1999)。維繫婚姻關係重要因素的成人期差異初探。教育與心理研究,22,145-160。
    林惠彥、高旭繁、馮輝棋 (2013)。同酬也要同工:組織公平知覺對國小教師的職家衝突與後果之調節。商略學報,5(2),137-152。
    許碧芬、蕭文玲 (2000)。 高科技業從業人員上司支持與工作-家庭衝突關係之研究。科技管理學刊,5,39-56。
    陳文良、王怡涵、邱雅萍 (2013)。台灣工作家庭衝突研究之回顧與展望。 人力資源管理學報,13(4), 79-106。
    黃宗堅、葉光輝、謝雨生 (2004)。夫妻關係中權力與情感的運作模式:以衝突因應策略為例。本土心理學研究,21,3-48。
    Adkins, C. L., Farmville, V. A., Premeaux, S. A., & Rock, L. (2014). The Use of Communication Technology to Manage Work-Home Boundaries. Journal of Behavioral & Applied Management, 15(2), 82-100
    Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, London, Sage.
    Allen, T. D. (2001). Family-supportive work environments: The role of organizational perceptions. Journal of vocational behavior, 58(3), 414-435.
    Allen, T. D., Herst, D. E., Bruck, C. S., & Sutton, M. (2000). Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: a review and agenda for future research. Journal of occupational health psychology, 5(2), 278-308.
    Allen, T. D., Cho, E., & Meier, L. L. (2014). Work–Family Boundary Dynamics.Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 99-121.
    Ammons, S. K. (2013). Work-family boundary strategies: Stability and alignment between preferred and enacted boundaries. Journal of Vocational Behavior,82(1), 49-58.
    Amstad, F. T., Meier, L. L., Fasel, U., Elfering, A., & Semmer, N. K. (2011). A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of occupational health psychology, 16(2), 151-169.
    Ashford, S. J., Blatt, R., & Walle, D. V. (2003). Reflections on the looking glass: A review of research on feedback-seeking behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 29(6), 773-799.
    Ashforth, B. E., Kreiner, G. E., & Fugate, M. (2000). All in a day`s work: Boundaries and micro role transitions. Academy of Management review, 25(3), 472-491.
    Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 251-280.
    Baer, M., & Frese, M. (2003). Innovation is not enough: Climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of organizational Behavior, 24(1), 45-68.
    Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action (pp. 5-107). Prentice Hall.: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
    Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
    Barnett, K. A., Del Campo, R. L., Del Campo, D. S., & Steiner, R. L. (2003). Work and family balance among dual-earner working-class Mexican-Americans: Implications for therapists. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(4), 353-366.
    Batemen, T. S., & Grant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(2), 103-18.
    Belschak, F. D., & Hartog, D. N. (2010). Pro‐self, prosocial, and pro‐organizational foci of proactive behaviour: Differential antecedents and consequences. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 475-498.
    Belschak, F. D., Hartog, D. N., & Fay, D. (2010). Exploring positive, negative and context‐dependent aspects of proactive behaviours at work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(2), 267-273.
    Bolino, M. C., & Turnley, W. H. (2005). The personal costs of citizenship behavior: the relationship between individual initiative and role overload, job stress, and work-family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 740-748.
    Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Niehoff, B. P. (2004). The other side of the story: Reexamining prevailing assumptions about organizational citizenship behavior. Human Resource Management Review, 14(2), 229-246.
    Bruck, C. S., Allen, T. D., & Spector, P. E. (2002). The relation between work–family conflict and job satisfaction: A finer-grained analysis. Journal of vocational Behavior, 60(3), 336-353.
    Bulger, C. A., Matthews, R. A., & Hoffman, M. E. (2007). Work and personal life boundary management: boundary strength, work/personal life balance, and the segmentation-integration continuum. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(4), 365-375.
    Byron, K. (2005). A meta-analytic review of work–family conflict and its antecedents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 169-198.
    Campbell, D. J. (2000). The proactive employee: Managing workplace initiative. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(3), 52-66.
    Carlson, D. S., Kacmar, K. M., & Williams, L. J. (2000). Construction and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of work–family conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 56(2), 249-276.
    Casper, W. J., Martin, J. A., Buffardi, L. C., & Erdwins, C. J. (2002). Work-family conflict, perceived organizational support, and organizational commitment among employed mothers. Journal of occupational health psychology, 7(2), 99-108.
    Chang, A., McDonald, P., & Burton, P. (2010). Methodological choices in work-life balance research 1987 to 2006: a critical review. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(13), 2381-2413.
    Chesley, N. (2005). Blurring boundaries? Linking technology use, spillover, individual distress, and family satisfaction. Journal of Marriage and Family,67(5), 1237-1248.
    Chiaburu, D. S., & Baker, V. L. (2006). Extra-role behaviors challenging the status-quo: Validity and antecedents of taking charge behaviors. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 620-637.
    Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human relations, 53(6), 747-770.
    Clark, S. C. (2002). Communicating across the work/home border. Community, Work & Family, 5(1), 23-48.
    Chan, D. (2006). Interactive effects of situational judgment effectiveness and proactive personality on work perceptions and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(2), 475-481.
    Champoux, J. E. (1978). Perceptions of work and nonwork A reexamination of the compensatory and spillover models. Work and Occupations, 5(4), 402-422.
    Crant, J. M. (1995). The Proactive Personality Scale and objective job performance among real estate agents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80(4), 532-537.
    Crant, J. M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of anagement, 26(3), 435-462.
    Cunningham, C. J., & De La Rosa, G. M. (2008). The interactive effects of proactive personality and work-family interference on well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 13(3), 271-282.
    Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when and how. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29, 1-19.
    Dierdorff, E. C., & Ellington, J. K. (2008). It`s the nature of the work: examining behavior-based sources of work-family conflict across occupations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 883-892.
    Duxbury, L., Higgins, C., Smart, R., & Stevenson, M. (2013). Mobile Technology and Boundary Permeability. British Journal of Management, 25(3), 570-588.
    Eagle, B. W., Miles, E. W., & Icenogle, M. L. (1997). Interrole conflicts and the permeability of work and family domains: Are there gender differences? Journal of Vocational Behavior, 50(2), 168-184.
    Eckenrode, J., & Gore, S. (1990). Stress and coping at the boundary of work and family. In Stress between work and family (pp. 1-16). Springer US.
    Edwards, J. R. (1995). Alternatives to difference scores as dependent variables in the study of congruence in organizational research. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64(3), 307-324.
    Edwards, J. R., & Rothbard, N. P. (2000). Mechanisms linking work and family: Clarifying the relationship between work and family constructs. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 178-199.
    Fay, D., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). A look back to move ahead: New directions for research on proactive performance and other discretionary work behaviours. Applied Psychology, 59(1), 1-20.
    Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2004). Technology‐assisted supplemental work: Construct definition and a research framework. Human Resource Management,43(2‐3), 179-200.
    Fenner, G. H., & Renn, R. W. (2009). Technology-assisted supplemental work and work-to-family conflict: The role of instrumentality beliefs, organizational expectations and time management. Human relations, 63(1), 63-82.
    Frese, M., & Fay, D. (2001). Personal initiative: An active performance concept for work in the 21st century. Research in organizational behavior, 23(4), 133-187.
    Frese, M., Fay, D., Hilburger, T., Leng, K., & Tag, A. (1997). The concept of personal initiative: Operationalization, reliability and validity in two German samples. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 70(2), 139-161.
    Frone, M. R., Russell, M., & Cooper, M. L. (1992). Antecedents and outcomes of work-family conflict: testing a model of the work-family interface. Journal of applied psychology, 77(1), 65-78.
    Grant, A. M., & Ashford, S. J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 3-34.
    Grawitch, M. J., Maloney, P. W., Barber, L. K., & Mooshegian, S. E. (2013). Examining the nomological network of satisfaction with work–life balance. Journal of occupational health psychology, 18(3), 276-284.
    Golden, A. G., & Geisler, C. (2007). Work–life boundary management and the personal digital assistant. Human Relations, 60(3), 519-551.
    Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. Academy of management review, 10(1), 76-88.
    Hall, D. T., & Richter, J. (1988). Balancing work life and home life: what can organizations do to help?. The Academy of Management Executive, 2(3), 213-223.
    Harvey, S., Blouin, C., & Stout, D. (2006). Proactive personality as a moderator of outcomes for young workers experiencing conflict at work. Personality and individual differences, 40(5), 1063-1074.
    Hecht, T. D., & Allen, N. J. (2009). A longitudinal examination of the work–nonwork boundary strength construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 839-862.
    Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American psychologist, 44(3), 513-524.
    Huang, A. H., & Yen, D. C. (2003). Usefulness of instant messaging among young users: Social vs. work perspective. Human Systems Management, 22(2), 63.
    Jiang, J. J., Hsu, M. K., Klein, G., & Lin, B. (2000). E-commerce user behavior model: an empirical study. Human Systems Management, 19(4), 265-276.
    Kahn, R. L., Wolfe, D. M., Quinn, R. P., Snoek, J. D., & Rosenthal, R. A. (1964). Organizational stress: Studies in role conflict and ambiguity. p. 1–470. New York.
    Kakihara, M. and C. Sørensen (2002) Post-Modern Professionals` Work and Mobile Technology. in Proceedings of the Paper presented at the New Ways of Working in IS: 25th Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia ~(IRIS25), ed.), pps. Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
    Kanungo, R. N. (1982). Measurement of job and work involvement. Journal of applied psychology, 67(3), 341-349.
    Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS quarterly, 183-213.
    Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations. New York: Wiley.
    Kaufman-Scarborough, C. (2006). Time Use and the Impact of Technology Examining workspaces in the home. Time & Society, 15(1), 57-80.
    Kickul, J., & Gundry, L. (2002). Prospecting for strategic advantage: the proactive entrepreneurial personality and small firm innovation. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(2), 85-97.
    Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management journal,42(1), 58-74.
    Kossek, E. E., & Ozeki, C. (1998). Work–family conflict, policies, and the job–life satisfaction relationship: A review and directions for organizational behavior–human resources research. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 139-149.
    Kossek, E. E., Ruderman, M. N., Braddy, P. W., & Hannum, K. M. (2012). Work–nonwork boundary management profiles: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(1), 112-128.
    Kreiner, G. E. (2006). Consequences of work‐home segmentation or integration: a person‐environment fit perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(4), 485-507.
    Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704-730.
    Lambert, S. J. (1990). Processes linking work and family: A critical review and research agenda. Human relations, 43(3), 239-257.
    Lewis, W., Agarwal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2003). Sources of influence on beliefs about information technology use: an empirical study of knowledge workers. MIS quarterly, 657-678.
    Lou, H., Chau, P. Y., & Li, D. (2005). Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 6(4), 102-129.
    Lu, J., Yao, J. E., & Yu, C. S. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245-268.
    Lu, L., Kao, S., Cooper, C.L., Allen, T.D., Lapierre, L.M., O’Driscoll, M., Poelmans, S.Y., Sanchez, J., & Spector, P. (2009). Work resources, work-to-family conflict, and its consequences: A Taiwanese–British cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Stress Management, 16(1), 25-44.
    Matthews, R. A., & Barnes-Farrell, J. L. (2010). Development and initial evaluation of an enhanced measure of boundary flexibility for the work and family domains. Journal of occupational health psychology, 15(3), 330-349.
    Matthews, R. A., Barnes-Farrell, J. L., & Bulger, C. A. (2010). Advancing measurement of work and family domain boundary characteristics. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3), 447-460.
    Matthews, R. A., Swody, C. A., & Barnes‐Farrell, J. L. (2012). Work Hours and Work–Family Conflict: The Double‐edged Sword of Involvement in Work and Family. Stress and Health, 28(3), 234-247.
    Mazmanian, M., Yates, J., & Orlikowski, W. (2006). Ubiquitous email: individual experiences and organizational consequences of blackberry use. Paper presented at the Annual Academy of Management Conference, Atlanta, GA
    Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., & Viswesvaran, C. (2005). Convergence between measures of work-to-family and family-to-work conflict: A meta-analytic examination. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 67(2), 215-232.
    Miceli, M., & Near, J. (1997). Whistle-blowing as antisocial behavior. In R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 130–149). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Michel, J. S., Kotrba, L. M., Mitchelson, J. K., Clark, M. A., & Baltes, B. B. (2011). Antecedents of work–family conflict: A meta‐analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(5), 689-725.
    Moreno-Jiménez, B., Mayo, M., Sanz-Vergel, A. I., Geurts, S., Rodríguez-Muñoz, A., & Garrosa, E. (2009). Effects of work-family conflict on employees’ well-being: The moderating role of recovery strategies. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 427-440.
    Morrison, E. W., & Phelps, C. C. (1999). Taking charge at work: Extrarole efforts to initiate workplace change. Academy of management Journal, 42(4), 403-419.
    Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. (2000). Interaction and outer action: Instant Messaging in Action. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 79-88). New York: ACM Press.
    Nippert-Eng, C. (1996). Home and work. Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. The university of Chicago Press: Chicago.
    Olson-Buchanan, J. B., & Boswell, W. R. (2006). Blurring boundaries: Correlates of integration and segmentation between work and nonwork. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 68(3), 432-445.
    Park, Y., & Jex, S. M. (2011). Work-home boundary management using communication and information technology. International Journal of Stress Management, 18(2), 133.
    Parker, S. (2000). From passive to proactive motivation: The importance of flexible role orientations and role breadth self‐efficacy. Applied Psychology,49(3), 447-469.
    Parker, S. K., & Collins, C. G. (2010). Taking stock: Integrating and differentiating multiple proactive behaviors. Journal of Management, 36(3), 633-662.
    Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of applied psychology, 91(3), 636.
    Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of applied psychology, 88(5), 879-903.
    Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology, 53(4), 518-528.
    Rank, J., Carsten, J. M., Unger, J. M., & Spector, P. E. (2007). Proactive customer service performance: Relationships with individual, task, and leadership variables. Human Performance, 20(4), 363-390.
    Richardson, K., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2011). Examining the antecedents of work connectivity behavior during non-work time. Information and Organization,21(3), 142-160.
    Rothbard, N. P., Phillips, K. W., & Dumas, T. L. (2005). Managing multiple roles: Work-family policies and individuals’ desires for segmentation.Organization Science, 16(3), 243-258.
    Richardson, K. M., & Thompson, C. A. (2012). High tech tethers and work-family conflict: A conservation of resources approach. Engineering Management Research, 1(1), p29.
    Schneider, B. (1983). Interactional psychology and organizational behavior. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.),
    Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of applied psychology, 84(3), 416.
    Seibert, S. E., Kraimer, M. L., & Crant, J. M. (2001). What do proactive people do? A longitudinal model linking proactive personality and career success. Personnel psychology, 54(4), 845-874.
    Shockley, K. M., & Allen, T. D. (2013). Episodic work–family conflict, cardiovascular indicators, and social support: An experience sampling approach. Journal of occupational health psychology, 18(3), 262.
    Sonnentag, S. (2003). Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 518.
    Sonnentag, S., Kuttler, I., & Fritz, C. (2010). Job stressors, emotional exhaustion, and need for recovery: A multi-source study on the benefits of psychological detachment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 355-365.
    Staines, G. L. (1980). Spillover versus compensation: A review of the literature on the relationship between work and nonwork. Human Relations, 33(2), 111-129.
    Tone Innstrand, S., Melbye Langballe, E., Arild Espnes, G., Falkum, E., & Gjerløw Aasland, O. (2008). Positive and negative work–family interaction and burnout: A longitudinal study of reciprocal relations. Work & Stress, 22(1), 1-15.
    Thompson, J. A. (2005). Proactive personality and job performance: a social capital perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 1011-1017.
    Turner, J. W., Grube, J. A., Tinsley, C. H., Lee, C., & O’Pell, C. (2006). Exploring the Dominant Media How Does Media Use Reflect Organizational Norms and Affect Performance?. Journal of Business Communication, 43(3), 220-250.
    Witt, L. A., & Carlson, D. S. (2006). The work-family interface and job performance: moderating effects of conscientiousness and perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 11(4), 343.
    Weick, K. E. (1979). The social psychology of organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    心理學研究所
    102752003
    103
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102752003
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[心理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    200301.pdf979KbAdobe PDF2454View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback