English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46291066      Online Users : 1449
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 教育學院 > 教育學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/76602


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76602


    Title: 多元與共識:現代精神之合法性基礎
    Other Titles: Plurality and Consensus: Legitimation Basis of Moernity
    Authors: 陳幼慧
    Chen, yu-hui
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: 多元性;共識;黑格爾;去中心化;現代
    Plurality;Consensus;Hegel;Decentralization;Modern
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2015-07-14 11:23:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在「現代」（Modern）與「後現代」（Postmodern）的爭論中，「邏各斯」（Logos）的問題是其中重要因素之一。後現代學者對「理性」（Reason）抱持悲觀的態度，認為西方邏各斯的傳統，在理性的基礎下，追求知識的普遍性、客觀性的態度，可能導致「歐洲中心主義」、「理性中心主義」、「一元中心主義」的危機，而忽略對「他者」（Other）的存在。希望以美學來取代理性傳統的地位，企圖以熱情的酒神戴奧尼斯（Dionysus）的精神取代太陽神阿波羅（Apollo）的理性傳統。 後現代對理性所有的質疑， 哈伯瑪斯（Jurgen Habermas）仍肯定現代化的合法性，認為現代性乃是「一未完成的計畫」，對治現代化工具理性過度膨脹的流弊，應回溯到啟蒙時代，回溯到西方理性的傳統所影響的近代主體主義，尤其肯定黑格爾之「主體性」（Subjektivitat）、「個體性」（Individuum）原則。藉由對現代化正當性的肯定，透過主體的自我反省能力，人類能在韋伯言下「工具理性」（instrumental rationality）所導致異狀態中解放，在理想情境中，用溝通理性重建人與人之間的共識（consensus）。
    In the conflict between "modernity" and "postmodernity"the logos problem is one of the most important matters of discussion. The representatives of postmodern thought show a rather pessimistic attitude towards reason. In their opinion the Western logos tradition could favour "Eurocentrism" as well as "Rationalism" and "Monism" as in this concept generality and objectivity are seen as subordinate to reason-based knowledge, and the result could be the neglecting of "other" concepts. In postmodern thought, however, the traditional position of reason is replaced by "aesthetics", the spirit of Apollo, the ancient God of the Sun, by that of Dionysus, the fervent God of Wine. As regards the postmodern doubt of reason, Juergen Habermas explicitly defends Ratio as the legitimacy of modernity. According to him Modernity is an "unfinishedproject". To avoid the problem of overstressing instrumental rationality he demands to go back to En1ightenment and to modern subjectivism which were influenced by the Western tradition of reason. He refers specially to Hegel`s principles of "Subjectivity" and "Individual". By approving of the right of Modernization and by the self-reflection of the subject man could free himself from alienation, which according to Weber had been caused by instrumental reason. In Haberm`s, vision of an ideal situation, consensus between all men could be reached by communicational rationality.
    Relation: 思與言 – 共識與多元與研究之專號, 38(3), 105-133
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2622View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback