Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/76836
|
| Title: | 限制員工權利新股實施之成效分析-台灣實證研究
The Effectiveness of Implementation of Restricted Stock for Taiwan |
| Authors: | 林耀煒
Lin, Wao Wei |
| Contributors: | 林信助
Lin, Shinn Juh
林耀煒
Lin, Wao Wei |
| Keywords: | 限制員工權利新股
資料包絡分析法
羅吉斯轉換
Restricted Stock
Data Envelope Theorem
Logistic Transformation |
| Date: | 2015 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-07-27 11:17:39 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 舊有的員工獎酬制度隨著台灣經濟發展與法制上的改革，激勵的效果已不如以往。為了改善此狀況，我國自2012年透過公司法修訂，台灣企業可開始實施限制員工權利新股(Restricted Stock)制度，為員工激勵措施的新方法。其靈活的操作方式，給與企業更多空間，可以制訂為自己量身打造的激勵條件，預期可使企業績效提升，讓企業達到留才與成長的效果。本文以已經採用限制員工權利新股制度之87間上市公司為標的，研究期間為2010至2014年，以Han(2003)與鄭桂蕙(2005)之迴歸模型做為基礎，搭配兩種典型財務分析的比率ROE與ROA，再利用資料包絡分析法所得到之純粹技術效率值(PTE)，三項績效衡量之指標作為因變數，進行實證分析。討論是否透過限制員工權利新股制度之實施，達到提升公司績效的效果。實證結果則顯示，利用此三種任一績效衡量的指標為對象討論，對企業績效的影響是正向且顯著的。此結果說明，實行限制員工權利新股之後，對於公司績效之提升，確實有幫助。對於此制度未來的持續發展，可預期將成為我國員工激勵措施的新標的，並成為我國企業成長的新動力。
Due to economic development and regulatory reforms, old compensation systems for employees are no longer considered effective. To improve the effectiveness, Taiwan’s Corporation Act was amended in 2012 to allow restricted stock as a new compensation scheme. The flexibility of the tailored-made restricted stocks allows corporations to attract and retain more talents, which may subsequently improve business performance. To examine the effectiveness of restricted stocks implemented among Taiwanese corporations, this thesis adopt three performance indicators, namely two typical financial analysis ratios, ROE and ROA, and a pure technical efficiency (PTE) measure obtained from the data envelopment analysis (DEA). With the regression model proposed by Han (2003) and Cheng (2005), we examine how restricted stocks have affected the performance of all 87 public firms which have adopted this new compensation system during the period from 2010 to 2014. The empirical investigation reveals that all three performance indicators are positively and significantly affected by the implementation of restricted stocks, which implies that the new compensation scheme is beneficial to business performance. It is therefore expected that the adoption restricted stocks will continue to be an important part of Taiwanese firm’s compensation system, and will certainly become a new source of corporate growth. |
| Reference: | (一)中文文獻
1. 中國改革發展研究院課題組，2000。美國員工持股計畫的理論與實踐，中國職工持股資訊網。
2. 李馨蘋、莊宗憲，2007。公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究－追蹤型資料二階段最小平方法之應用，東吳經濟商學學報，第57期，頁1-27。
3. 吳嘉修，2003。台灣新舊銀行的經營效率及生產力變動之比較分析，朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
4. 姚鷺，2003。員工配股對股東權益的影響，國立台灣大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
5. 俞海琴與陳慧娟，1999。我國上市公司成長、槓桿與托賓Q關聯之研究，風險管理學報，第1 卷第1 期，頁81-101。
6. 童怡璇，2004。台灣電子業技術效率分析―三階段資料包絡分析法之應用，國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文。
7. 葉桂珍、陳昱志，1995。銀行經營績效分析—資料包絡分析法 (DEA) 與財務比率法之比較，企銀季刊，第19 卷，第2 期，頁30-39。
8. 葛冠琳，2006。美國限制型股票之研究，國立成功大學法律所碩士論文。
9. 鄭桂蕙，2005。員工持股制度與公司績效，東吳經濟商學學報第五十一期，頁101-130。
10. 廖秀梅、李建然與吳祥華，2006。董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族企業因素的影響，東吳經濟商學學報，第54卷，頁17-160。
11. 廖美涵，2013。台灣電子業上市櫃公司經營之績效評估―採DEA Benchmarking Model，私立東吳大學經濟研究所碩士論文。
12. 蕭麗慧，2012。台灣上市櫃公司經營與公司治理之績效評估—採DEA Benchmarking Models，東吳大學經營管理學系碩士論文。
(二)英文文獻
1. Allen, J. W., and G.M. Phillips, 2002, Corporate Equity Ownership, Strategic Alliances, and Product Market Relationships. Journal of Finance, Vol.55, 6, pp.2791-2815.
2. Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, and W. W. Cooper, 1984. Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science, 30, pp.1078–1092.
3. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, 1978. Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, pp.429–444.
4. Chatterjee, S., and B.Wernerfet, 1991. The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence. Strategic Management Journal, 22, pp.747-776
5. Chen, Y.S., and B.Y. Chen, 2009. Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate the operational performance of the wafer fabrication industry in Taiwan. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol.20, No.4, pp.475-488
6. Conte, M. A., and J. Svejnar, 1988. Productivity Effects of Worker Participation In Management, Profit-Sharing, Worker Ownership of Asset and Unionization in U.S. Firms. International Journal of Organization, 6, pp.139-152.
7. Demsetz, H., and K. Lehn, 1985. The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93, pp.1155-1177.
8. Farrell, M. J, 1957. The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Journal Royal Statistical Society, 120, pp.253–281.
9. Gillian, H. H. Yeo, S.S. Chen, K.W. Ho, and C.F. Lee, 1999. Effects of Executive Share Option Plans on Shareholder Wealth and Firm Performance: The Singapore Evidence. Financial Review, 34, No.2, pp.1-20.
10. Han T. S., 2003. The Economic Effects of Profit Sharing and Taiwan-style Employee Stock Owner ship Plans: Evidence from Taiwan’s High-tech Firms.台灣管理學刊, 第三卷第一期, pp.1-22。
11. Hill, C. W. L., and S. A. Snell, 1989, Effects of Ownership Structure and Control on Corporate Productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 32, pp.25-46.
12. Jensen, M. C., and W. H. Meckling, 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, pp.305-360.
13. Jensen, M.C., 1985. Agency Cost Of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers. American Economic Review, Vol.76, No.2, pp.323-329.
14. Jensen, M.C., and R.S. Ruback, 1983. The market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Finance, Vol.11, pp.5-50.
15. Jones, C., and T, Kato, 1995. The Productivity Effects of ESOP and Bonuses Evidence from Japanese Panel data. The American Economic Review, Vol.85, No.3, pp.391-414.
16. Kahle, M., and Shastri, K, 2004. Executive Loans. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, Vol.39, No.4, pp.791-811.
17. Kauhanen, A., 2002. Profit sharing in Finland: earnings and productivity effects. The research institute of the Finnish Economy. ETLA Discussion Papers, 817.
18. Kruse, D.L., 1993. Profit Sharing: Does it make a Difference? Kalamazoo, Michigan: W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research.
19. Kruse, D.L., 1996. Why do firms adopt Profit-Sharing and Employment Ownership Plans? British Journal of Industrial Relation, 34, pp.515-538
20. Lev, B., and Z, Paul, 1999, The Boundaries of Financial Reporting and How to Extend Them. Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.37, No.2, pp.353-385
21. Liang, Y.C., and N, Fang, 2011. Supplier productivity and quality performance evaluation in the TFT-LCD industry. Asia - Pacific Journal of Operational Research, Vol.28, No.6, pp.787-802
22. Luo, Q., and T. Hachiya, 2005. Corporate governance, cash holdings, and firm value: Evidence from Japan. Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies, 8, pp.613-636
23. Mak, Y. T., and Y. Kusnadi, 2005. Size really matters: further evidence on the negative relationship between board size and firm value. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13, pp.301-318.
24. Modigliani, F., and M.H, Miller, 1966. Corporate Income Taxes and the Cost of Capital: A Correction. The American Economic Review, Vol.53, No.3, pp.433-443.
25. Morbey, G., and R. M, Reithner, 1990. How R&D affects sales growth, productivity and profitability. Research Technology Management. Vol.33, pp.11-14.
26. Myers, S. C., 1977. Determinants of Corporate Borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics, 5, pp.147–175.
27. Myers, S. C., and N. S. Majluf, 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics, 13, pp.187-221.
28. Resti, A., 1997. Evaluating the Cost-Efficiency of the Italian Banking System: What Can Be Learned from the Joint Application of Parametric and Non-Parametric Techniques. Journal Banking and Finance, 21(2), pp.221-250.
29. Sougiannis, T., 1994. The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D. The Accounting Review, Vol.69, No.1, pp.44-68.
30. Steiner, T. L., 1996. A Reexamination of the Relationships between Ownership Structure, Firm Diversification, and Tobin`s Q. Journal of Business and Economics, Vol.35, 1996, pp.39-48
31. Thore S., G. Kozmetsky., and F. Phillips, 1994. DEA of financial statements data : the US computer industry”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol.5, No.3, pp.229-248
32. Yang, C.F., C.C. Pai, and Z.Y. Lee, 2012. Performance assessment of the top ten TFT-LCD manufacturers. International Journal of Electronic Business |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
國際經營與貿易研究所
102351010 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102351010 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [國際經營與貿易學系 ] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 101001.pdf | 974Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 126 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
