English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91913/122132 (75%)
Visitors : 25724678      Online Users : 271
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/77223


    Title: 資訊架構之組織系統與搜尋系統對於學習成效的影響研究:以「自然與人文數位博物館」為例-final
    The Effects of Organization System and Search System of Information Architecture on Learning Performance: Case Study of the Digital Museum of Nature & Culture
    Authors: 陳美智
    Chen, Mei Chih
    Contributors: 陳志銘
    Chen, Chih Ming
    陳美智
    Chen, Mei Chih
    Keywords: 資訊架構
    數位學習
    組織系統
    搜尋系統
    數位博物館
    數位圖書館
    Information architecture
    E-learning
    Organization system
    Search system
    Digital museum
    Digital library
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-08-03 13:26:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 透過數位博物館具有良好資訊組織和經過管理的數位資源,應用於支援數位學習具有極高的發展潛力。而將資訊架構概念導入數位博物館網站設計,有助於發展更優質之數位博物館網站,促使使用者以更有效率的方式取得所需要的典藏資源,達到數位博物館支援終身學習的目的。本研究以Morae 人機互動分析軟體觀察學習者利用數位博物館輔助學習之學習歷程,並經由學習歷程分析探討數位博物館支援數位學習過程中,學習者單獨以數位博物館資訊架構中的組織系統、搜尋系統,以及利用組織系統搭配搜尋系統輔助完成學習任務,對於學習成效、認知負荷、學習效率與任務達成時間的影響差異。
    研究結果顯示:(1)搭配使用組織系統及搜尋系統與使用組織系統學習者的學習成效顯著優於使用搜尋系統的學習者;(2)使用搜尋系統的學習者在認知負荷上顯著高於搭配使用組織系統與搜尋系統的學習者;(3)搭配使用組織系統與搜尋系統的學習者在學習效率上顯著高於使用搜尋系統的學習者;(4)使用組織系統的學習者在任務達成時間上顯著高於使用搜尋系統的學習者;(5)搭配使用組織系統與搜尋系統的圖像視覺型學習者在認知負荷上顯著高於口語聽覺型學習者;(6)圖像視覺型的學習者搭配使用組織系統與搜尋系統,在學習成效上高於使用搜尋系統;(7)使用組織系統、搜尋系統與搭配使用組織系統與搜尋系統高資訊焦慮學習者的認知負荷顯著高於低資訊焦慮學習者;(8)高資訊焦慮學習者使用搜尋系統在認知負荷上顯著高於搭配使用組織系統與搜尋系統
    最後,根據研究結果,本研究亦提出數位博物館資訊架構輔助數位學習的教學建議,也針對「自然與人文數位博物館」的網站資訊架構設計提出建議。
    Reference: 于第(2011)。技專校院圖書館在數位學習環境中之服務現況與發展。大學圖書館,15(1),41-67。
    于第(2011)。數位學習時代科技大學學生對圖書館服務需求之研究。圖書館學與資訊科學,37(1),56-66。
    于第、林玉美、何定禧(2010)。從科技大學教師看法探討數位教學與數位學習需求對圖書館服務之影響。教育資料與圖書館學,47(4),429-457。
    王梅玲(2002)。美國大學遠距學習圖書館服務的探討。大學圖書館,6(2),65-87。
    朱育嬋(2009)。行動數位圖書館在蝴蝶生態建置與教學應用模式(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺南大學,台南市。
    何慧儀、林冠伶(2011)。博物館數位典藏學習系統品質對學習成效之影響研究。中華印刷科技年報,(2011),587-598。
    吳美美(2004)。數位學習現況與未來發展。圖書館學與資訊科學,30(2),92-106 。
    官欣瑩(2008)。Wiki資訊架構之可用性評估: 以台灣棒球維基館為例(未出版之博士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
    林志遠(2005)。數位博物館內容之學習效益可行性評估(未出版之博士論文)。屏東科技大學,屏東縣。
    林育如(2011)。行動閱讀之資訊呈現方式對於學習者專注力、閱讀理解與認知負荷之影響研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
    林信成、林瑜嫻(2008)。台灣棒球維基館網站推展成效探討。教育資料與圖書館學,45(2),199-232。
    林珊如(2006)。數位圖書館使用者研究趨勢之考察。Journal of Library and Information Science,32(2),18-31。
    林菁。(2008)。資訊素養融入大學生主題探究之研究。教育資料與圖書館學,46(2),233-266。
    林麗娟(2005)。數位學習與圖書館投入。台北市立圖書館館訊,22(4),1-11。
    侯皓之(2007)。從國立故宮博物院「數位博物館」談資訊融入教學。在國家教育研究院籌備處(編),數位學習在故宮(一)館校合作策略、應用與實務(48-72)。新北市:國家教育研究院籌備處。
    徐典裕、劉杏津、王秀雯(2011)。 兒童學習網站融入遊戲因子之研究─以國立自然科學博物館兒童數位博物館為例。 博物館學季刊,25(2),65-91。
    徐敏珠、楊建民。(2006),我國高等教育之數位學習發展策略分析。教育學刊,(26),191-214。
    高鵬(2004)。我國縣級以上公共圖書館網站及使用者需求之研究(未出版之博士論文)。淡江大學,新北市。
    陳志銘、陳佳琪(2008)。數位典藏支援數位學習現況與發展。台灣圖書館管理季刊,4(2),9-23。
    陳昭珍(2002)。數位典藏與數位文化。資訊與教育雜誌,91,17-23。
    陳昭珍(2003)。數位學習與數位圖書館。書苑,56,46-59。
    項潔、陳雪華、陳昭珍、郭筑盈(2005)。數位典藏產業商業模式之探討。中華民國圖書館學會會報,75,63-74。
    項潔、陳雪華、鄭惇方、魏雅惠(2004)。數位典藏加值應用之探討。圖書資訊學刊,2(1),1-17。
    黃國禎(2006)。數位時代的學習契機與要素。研習論壇月刊,71,5-10。
    黃景瑋(2004)。數位博物館應用於國中視覺藝術課程之教學行動研究(未出版之博士論文)。國立東華大學,花蓮縣。
    黃朝盟、趙美慧(2001)。COM的策略規劃與設計。新北市:商鼎。
    蔡慧美(2003)。資訊焦慮對個人資訊尋求行為及模式的影響。美國資訊科學與技術學會臺北學生分會會訊,p.95-119
    蕭貴容(2014)。兒童博物館學習經驗融入中年級視覺藝術課程之行動研究-以「迷宮游藝」為例(未出版之博士論文)。國立臺北教育大學,臺北市。
    賴志群(2003)。數位學習現況與未來發展趨勢。電腦繪圖與設計雜誌,183,134-136。
    賴鼎陞、張哲娬。博物館數位展示與活動設計:以[宋徽宗的御花園]巡迴展為例。在國家教育研究院籌備處(編),數位學習在故宮(一)館校合作策略、應用與實務(48-72)。新北市:國家教育研究院籌備處。
    謝寶煖、周秉貞(2004),政府網站資訊架構之評估,管理與系統,11(2),177-198。
    藍素華(2000)。大學圖書館網站資訊架構可用性之研究。中國圖書館學會會報,67,139-154。
    顏榮泉(1996),全球資訊網在教學與學習上之應用探討,教學科技與媒體,(25),33-41
    龐宇珺(2013)。從使用者獲取與分享行為探究 Moodle 數位學習平台之資訊架構特質:以師大 Moodle典範課程為例(未出版之博士論文)。臺灣師範大學,臺北市。
    顧潔心、顧大維(2010)。針對不同學習風格學習者的多媒體呈現原則歸納與分析研究,2010電腦與網路科技在教育上的應用研討會發表之論文,新竹市。
    Abbasi, F., & Zardary, S. (2012). Digital libraries and its role on supporting E-Learning. Computer Science, 1, 809-813.
    Alex Koohang.(2004).Students' perceptions toward the use of the digital library in weekly web-based distance learning assignments portion of a hybrid programme. British Journal of Educational Technology,35(5),620-635
    Allen, M. W. (2006). Creating successful e-Learning: A Rapid system for getting it right first time, every time. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. and Information Sciences, Third Edition, 1(1), 2361-2368.
    Altameem, T. (2013). Delivering E-Learner Satisfaction: A Study of the Technical Dimensions. International Journal of Advanced Science & Technology,53,1-15
    Arms, W. Y., Blanchi, C., & Overly, E. A. (1997). An architecture for information in digital libraries. D-Lib Magazine, 3(2) Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february97/cnri/02arms1.html
    Arms, W.Y., Blanchi, C. and Overly, E.A. (1997), An architecture for information in
    ASIS&T.(2014).Association for Information Science and Technology. Retrieved from http://www.asis.org/
    Averill, D., & Lewis, N. (2013). Students and Information Literacy: High School and Postsecondary Perspectives. Maine Policy Review, 22(1), 114-117.
    Barker.(2014).What is information architecture?. Retrieved from http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_whatisinfoarch/index.html
    Bayne, S., Ross, J., & Williamson, Z. (2009). Objects, subjects, bits and bytes: learning from the digital collections of the National Museums. museum and society, 7(2), 110-124.
    Beagrie, N. (2008). Digital curation for science, digital libraries, and individuals. International Journal of Digital Curation, 1(1), 3-16.
    Borgman, C. L. (1999). What are digital libraries? Competing visions. InformationProcessing and Management, 35, 227–243.
    Borgman, C. L., Sølvberg, I., and Kovács, L. (2002). Evaluation of Digital Libraries:Testbeds, Measurements, and Metrics. Fourth DELOS workshop.
    Casuto,D.(2008).Information Architecture and the Design and Development of eLearning.ITEC,865,1-15
    Chen, C. M., & Lin, S. T. (2014). Assessing effects of information architecture of digital libraries on supporting E-learning: A case study on the Digital Library of Nature & Culture. Computers & Education, 75, 92-102.
    Chen, C. M., & Sun, Y. C. (2012). Assessing the effects of different multimedia materials on emotions and learning performance for visual and verbal style learners. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1273-1285.
    Chen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education,80,108-121.
    Chu, H. C., Hwang G. J., Huang, S. X., & Wu, T. T. (2008). A knowledge engineering approach to developing e-libraries for mobile learning. The Electronic Library, 26(3), 303-317.
    D. R., & Montgomery, D. (2012). Annoyance or delight? College students' perspectives on looking for information. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(6), 380-390.
    Digital Library Federation. (1999). A Working Definition of Digital Library.
    Dillon, A. & Turnbull, D(2010) .Information Architecture. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Sciences, Third Edition, 1(1), 2361-2368.
    Dong, A. & Agogino, A.M. (2001). Design principles for the information architecture of a SMET education digital library.1st ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL’01), 314-21.
    Eke Miss, H. N. (2011). Library Portals and Information Architecture: Librarians Emerging Info-Architects. International Research Journal of Library and Information Science, 1(2), 101-113.
    El Alami, M., Casel, N., & Zampunieris, D. (2008). An architecture for e-learning system with computational intelligence. Electronic Library, 26(3), 318-328.
    Fuchs, M., Muscogiuri, C., Niedere´e, C. & Hemmje, M. (2004). Digital libraries in knowledge management: an e-learning case study, International Journal on Digital Libraries, 4 (1), 31-5.
    Gagne,R.M.(1985).The Condition of Learning. New York:Rinehart & Winston.
    Graf, S., Shuk, K., & Liu, T. C. (2008,). Identifying learning styles in learning management systems by using indications from students' behaviour. In Advanced Learning Technologies, 2008. ICALT'08. Eighth IEEE International Conference on (pp. 482-486). IEEE.
    Gross, M., & Latham, D. (2011). Experiences with and Perceptions of Information: A Phenomenographic Study of First-Year College Students1. The Library, 81(2).Denison,
    Gullikson, S., Blades, R., Bragdon, M., Mckibbon, S., Sparling, M., Toms, E. G. (1999). The impact of information architecture on academic web site usability. The Electronic Library, 17(5), 293-305.
    Gunasekaran, A., McNeil, R. D., & Shaul, D. (2002)。E-learning: research and applications。Industrial and Commercial Training,34(2),44-53。
    Gunn, H. (2002). Virtual libraries supporting student learning. School Libraries Worldwide, 8, 27-37.
    Gwizdka, J. (2010). Distribution of cognitive load in web search. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(11), 2167-2187.
    Gwizdka, J., & Lopatovska, I. (2009). The role of subjective factors in the information search process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2452-2464.
    Harvey, R. (2010). Digital curation: A how-to-do-it manual. New York:Neal-Schuman.
    He, D., Peng, Y., Mao, M., & Wu, D. (2010). Supporting information access in e-learning by integrating digital libraries and ontology. Online Information Review, 34(5), 704-728.
    Hughes, Lorna M.(2011). Measuring impact and use: scholarly information-seeking behavior. L.M. Editor (Ed.), Evaluating and measuring the value, use and impact of digital collections(85-102).London: Facet Publishing
    Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56(4), 1023–1031.
    Info.design (2010) Why Information Architecture? Retrieved March 30, 2010 from http://www.infodn.com/whyia.shtml
    Iyer, A., Ghosh, A., & More, D. (2010). Designing Information Architecture of a Digital Library. CURIE Journal, 3(1),52-57.
    Jensen, L., & Harbo, K. (2005). E-learning: The library as facilitator in the learning environment.Retrieved December 10, 2014, from http://216.239.33
    Kirsh D. (2000). A Few Thoughts on Cognitive Overload. Intellectica, 1(30), 19-51.
    Kovel-Jarboe, P. (2001). The changing contexts of higher education and four possible futures for distance education. Issues Challenging Education. University of Minnesota, available at http://horizon.unc.edu/projects/issues/papers/kovel.asp.
    Leahy, W., & Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory, modality of presentation and the transient information effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(6), 943-951.
    Liu, K., Chen, X., Zheng, T., & Liu, Z. (2014). Research on BC E-commerce Website Information Architecture Level. International Journal of Multimedia and Ubiquitous Engineering ,9(4),233-246.
    Lynch, C. (2003).Colliding with the real world:Heresies and unexplored questions about audience, economics, and control of digital libraries(191-216). In A. P. Bishop, N. A.Van House & B.P. Buttenfield (Eds.), Digital library use: Social practice in design andevaluation. Cambridge,MA: The MIT Press.
    Marchionini, G., & Fox, E. A. (1999). Progress Toward Digital Libraries: Augmentation through Integration. Information Processing & Management, 35(3), 219-25.
    Masullo, M., & Mack, R. (1996). Roles for digital libraries in K-12 education.British Journal of Educational Technology,35(5),620-628
    MLA, 2010b. Opening up Spaces: Bringing New People into Museums, Liberties and Archives by Supporting Self-organised Learning. UK: Museums, Library, and Archives Council.
    Morrogh, E. (2002). Information architecture: An emerging 21st century profession. Pearson Education.
    O'Leary, M. (2000). Distance learning and libraries. ONLINE-WESTON THEN WILTON, 24(4), 94-96.
    Parandjuk, J. C.(2010). Using Information Architecture to Evaluate Digital Libraries. The Reference Librarian , 51(2), 124 -134.
    Porter, S. (2005). Managed learning environments: Strategy, planning and implementation. In Maxine M. (Ed.), Supporting e-learning: A guide for library and information managers. London: Facet Publishing.
    Resmini, A., & Rosati, L. (2012). A brief history of information architecture. Journal of Information Architecture, 3(2),33-45.
    Rosenfeld, L., & Morville, P. (2006). Information architecture for the world wide web. (3rd ed.). Sebastopol, CA: Oreilly & Associates Inc.
    Russo, A., Watkins, J., & Groundwater‐Smith, S. (2009). The impact of social media on informal learning in museums. Educational Media International, 46(2), 153-166.
    Sharifabadi, S.R.(2006). How digital libraries can support e-learning. The Electronic Library, 24(3), 389-401.
    Shiri, A., & Molberg, K. (2005). Interfaces to knowledge organization systems in Canadian digital library collections. Online Information Review, 29(6), 604-620.
    Spector, J. M. (2010). An overview of progress and problems in educational technology. Digital Education Review, 3, 27-37.
    Srinivasan, R., Becvar, K., Boast, R., & Enote, J. (2010). Diverse knowledges and contact zones within the digital museum. Science, Technology & Human Values,35(5),735-768.
    Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational psychology review, 10(3), 251–296.
    The International Council of Museums. “ICOM.“http://icom.museum/ (accessed December 01, 2014).
    Vassilakaki, E., & Garoufallou, E. (2013). Multilingual Digital Libraries: A review of issues in system-centered and user-centered studies, information retrieval and user behavior. The International Information & Library Review, 45(1), 3-19.
    Villaverde, J. E., Godoy, D., & Amandi, A. (2006). Learning styles' recognition in e‐learning environments with feed‐forward neural networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(3), 197-206.
    Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 327–342.
    Wurman, R. S.(2001). Information Anxiety 2. Indianapolis, Ind
    Xu, L. D. (2011). Information architecture for supply chain quality management. International Journal of Production Research, 49(1), 183-198.
    Yuan, F., Xiao, P., Liu, Q., & Fu, X. (2009). Digital campus information portal content organization based on information architecture. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interaction Sciences: Information Technology, Culture and Human (pp. 1330-1334). ACM
    Zwies, R. (2000). Observations on the American society for information science summit 2000 meeting: defining information architecture. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 26(5), 10-12.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    圖書資訊與檔案學研究所
    102155010
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102155010
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[圖書資訊與檔案學研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    501001.pdf5746KbAdobe PDF121View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback