English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140900 (78%)
Visitors : 46066014      Online Users : 1259
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78125


    Title: 從複雜理論觀點探討MOOCs創新擴散之動態歷程
    Exploring the Dynamic Diffusion Process of MOOCs From a Complexity Theory Perspective
    Authors: 許映庭
    Contributors: 溫肇東
    許映庭
    Keywords: 大規模開放式線上課程
    創新擴散
    複雜理論
    Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs)
    Diffusion of Innovations
    Complexity Theory
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-09-01 16:31:34 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: MOOCs實現了高等教育的跨國性、大量性與開放性,成功將世界各地的學習者、教學者與相關機構帶進全球網絡,為全球知識與傳播提供一個全新的平台。這場由世界頂尖大學所引發的MOOCs風暴,短時間內便席捲全球,在高等教育界掀起一陣波瀾。《紐約時報》甚至將MOOCs形容成一場「校園海嘯」,以迅雷不及掩耳的速度,衝擊高等教育的百年現場。

    然而,究竟這場MOOCs風暴是如何一路延燒到世界各地?不同階段的影響因素又有何不同?為了釐清這些問題,本研究利用複雜理論「系統性」與「動態性」的觀點,探討MOOCs創新擴散之動態歷程,分析相關因素如何影響各個階段的歷程演變,以及因素之間互動後所產生的回饋關係。

    本研究採用歷史研究法,並參考王美雅(2005)的創新擴散之動態模型,做為研究架構之基礎,探討MOOCs各階段擴散歷程之初始狀態、演化與正向回饋效果以及自我組織的現象。

    研究結果發現,MOOCs的擴散事實上是一個自我組織的過程。在MOOCs擴散過程中,以「創新者的網路位置」與「理解創新的難易程度」兩項變數的影響尤其顯著。而各項變數之間不僅擁有正向回饋效果,亦存在著負向回饋效果,進而影響MOOCs的擴散與演化。
    MOOCs successfully brought global students, educators, and related organization into a global network, forming a platform for global diffusion of knowledge. Started by top universities around the globe, MOOCs’ forces have swept around the globe in a short amount of time, creating ripples in the higher education web. The New York Times describes MOOCs as a “Campus Tsunami,” sweeping through the sectors of higher education.

    How did this “Campus Tsunami” sweep around the globe? What are the factors that affect its dynamic diffusion process? In order to clarify these questions, this study employs the systematic and dynamic point of view of the complex theory to analyze how the factors influence each of MOOCs diffusion stages and what effects the factors create after interaction.

    This study employs the historical study method and Mei Ya, Wang’s (2005) dynamic innovation diffusion model as the fundamental structure to explore the initial conditions, evolution and positive reinforcements, and self-organization of each diffusion stage.

    The results demonstrate that MOOCs’ diffusion is based on self-organization. Within the seven factors, innovator networks and the difficulties in understanding innovation are the foremost influential factors. During MOOCs diffusion stages, the different factors interact with each other, producing both positive reinforcements and negative reinforcements, thus influencing MOOCs continuous diffusion and development.
    目次 I
    表次 III
    圖次 IV
    第一章 緒論 1
    第一節 研究背景與動機 1
    第二節 研究目的與問題 6
    第二章 文獻探討 7
    第一節 複雜理論 7
    第二節 創新擴散 11
    第三章 研究方法 16
    第一節 研究架構 16
    第二節 研究設計 18
    第三節 研究流程 20
    第四章 大規模開放式線上課程(MOOCs) 21
    第一節 MOOCs概述 21
    第二節 MOOCs發展歷程 31
    第五章 研究發現與討論 47
    第一節 研究分析 47
    第二節 研究發現 63
    第六章 結論與建議 67
    第一節 研究結論 67
    第二節 學術貢獻 70
    第三節 研究限制 71
    第四節 後續研究建議 72
    參考文獻 73
    Reference: 一、英文部分

    Abrahamson, E. & Rosenkopf, L. (1997). Social network effects on the extent of innovation diffusion: A computer simulation. Organization Science, 8(3), 289-309.
    Agarwal, A. (2013a, November 13). edX Celebrates Our First Anniversary. edX Blog. Retrieved from: http://blog.edx.org/edx-celebrates-first-anniversary/
    Agarwal, A. (2013b). MOOCs for the Arab World. Retrieved from: https://www.edx.org/blog/moocs-arab-world
    Anderson, P. (1999). Complexity Theory and Organization Science. Organization Science, 10 (3), 216-232.
    Brooks, D. (2012, May 3). The Campus Tsunami. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/04/opinion/brooks-the-campus-tsunami.html
    Chung, C. (2015). From Disruptor to Bestie: How Instructors are Learning to Leverage MOOCs. Retrieved from: https://www.edsurge.com/n/2015-03-20-from-disruptor-to-bestie-how-instructors-are-learning-to-leverage-moocs
    Conway, M. (2013, June 21). HarvardX’s New Fall Offerings To Include Two SPOCs. The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved from: http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/6/21/new-edx-fall-2013/
    Coursera. (2013a, October 23). A Triple Milestone: 107 Partners, 532 Courses, 5.2 Million Students and Counting. Coursera Blog. Retrieved from: http://blog.coursera.org/post/64907189712/a-triple-milestone-107-partners-532-courses-52
    Coursera. (2013b, February 21). 29 New Schools, 92 New Courses, 5 Languages, 4 Continents and 2.7 Million Courserians. Coursera Blog. Retrieved from: http://blog.coursera.org/post/43625628117/29-new-schools-92-new-courses-5-languages-4
    Crowley, J. (2013, August 15). cMOOCs: Putting Collaboration First. Campus Technology. Retrieved from: http://campustechnology.com/Articles/2013/08/15/cMOOCs-Putting-Collaboration-First.aspx
    Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 16 (3). Retrieved from: http://jime.open.ac.uk/articles/10.5334/2012-18/
    DeBoer, J., Seaton, D., Stump, G. S. & Breslow, L. (2013). Diversity in MOOC Students‘ Backgrounds and Behaviors in Relationship to Performance in 6.002 x. In Proceedings of the Sixth Learning International Networks Consortium Conference.
    Downes, S. (2013, April 9). What the `x` in `xMOOC` stands for. Retrieved from: https://plus.google.com/wm/1/+StephenDownes/posts/LEwaKxL2MaM
    EdX. (2013, November 13). IMF and edX Join Forces to Pilot Online Economics. edX Blog. Retrieved from: http://blog.edx.org/imf-edx-join-forces-pilot-online/
    EFE. (2014, July 27). Telefonica and Santander team up to launch online education platform. Fox News Latino. Retrieved from: http://latino.foxnews.com/latino/news/2014/07/27/telefonica-and-santander-team-up-to-launch-online-education-platform/
    Fini, A., Formiconi, A., Giorni, A., Pirruccello, N., Spadavecchia, E., & Zibordi, E. (2008). IntroOpenEd 2007: An experience on open education by a virtual community of teachers. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 4(1). Retrieved from: http://je-lks.maieutiche.economia.unitn.it/en/08_01/11Apfini_en.pdf
    Friedman, T. L. (2013, January 26). Revolution Hits the Universities. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/opinion/sunday/friedman-revolution-hits-the-universities.html
    Hardesty, L. (2012, July 16). Lessons learned from MITx’s prototype course. MIT News. Retrieved from: http://newsoffice.mit.edu/2012/mitx-edx-first-course-recap-0716
    Hashmi, A. & Shih, C. (2013, April 26). Rejecting edX, Amherst Doubts Benefits of MOOC Revolution. The Harvard Crimson. Retrieved from: http://www.thecrimson.com/article/2013/4/26/amherst-rejects-edx-moocs/
    Hickey, D. (2015). What is a BOOC? Retrieved from: http://www.indiana.edu/~booc/what-is-a-booc/
    Holland, J. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity, Addison-Wesley.
    Hollands, F. M. & Tirthali, D. (2014). MOOCs: expectations and reality. Center for Benefit-Cost Studies of Education, Teachers College, Columbia University, NY. Retrieved from: http://cbcse.org/wordpress/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/MOOCs_Expectations_and_Reality.pdf
    Jaschik, S. (2013, August 19). Feminist Anti-MOOC. Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/08/19/feminist-professors-create-alternative-moocs
    Kauffman, S. A. (1991). Antichaos and Adaptation. Scientific American, 64-70.
    Kizilcec, R. F., Piech, C., & Schneider, E. (2013). Deconstructing Disengagement: Analyzing Learner Subpopulations in Massive Open Online Courses. LAK `13 Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 170-179.
    Lewin, T. (2012a, March 4). Instruction for Masses Knocks Down Campus Walls. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/05/education/moocs-large-courses-open-to-all-topple-campus-walls.html
    Lewin, T. (2012b, July 17). Universities Reshaping Education on the Web. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/17/education/consortium-of-colleges-takes-online-education-to-new-level.html?_r=0
    Moe, R. (2015). The brief & expansive history (and future) of the MOOC: Why two divergent models share the same name. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://scholarworks.umb.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1009&context=ciee
    Morel, B. & Ramanujam, R. (1999). Through the looking glass of complexity: The dynamics of organizations as adaptive and evolving systems. Organization Science, 10, 278-293.
    Pappano, L. (2012, November 2). The Year of the MOOC. The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/04/education/edlife/massive-open-online-courses-are-multiplying-at-a-rapid-pace.html
    Rodriguez, C. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like courses: Two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 15(2). Retrieved from: http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Rodriguez.pdf
    Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (Fourth Edition). New York: Free Press.
    Shah, D. (2014). Online Courses Raise Their Game: A Review of MOOC Stats and Trends in 2014. Retrieved from: https://www.class-central.com/report/moocs-stats-and-trends-2014
    Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10
    Waldrop, M. M.(1994)。複雜─走在秩序與混沌邊緣(初版)(齊若蘭譯)。台北:天下文化。(原著出版年:1992)
    Watters, A. (2012, December 3). Top Ed-Tech Trends of 2012: MOOCs. Retrieved from: http://hackeducation.com/2012/12/03/top-ed-tech-trends-of-2012-moocs/
    Watters, A. (2013, November 29). Top Ed-Tech Trends of 2013: MOOCs and Anti-MOOCs. Retrieved from: http://hackeducation.com/2013/11/29/top-ed-tech-trends-2013-moocs/
    Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
    Wilhelm, A. (2014, September 10). Coursera President Daphne Koller: 2014 Is The Year MOOCs Will Come Of Age. TechCrunch. Retrieved from: http://techcrunch.com/2014/09/10/coursera-president-daphne-koller-2014-is-the-year-moocs-will-come-of-age/
    Yuan, L. & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and Open Education: Implications for Higher Education. JISC CETIS (White Paper). Retrieved from: http://publications.cetis.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/MOOCs-and-Open-Education.pdf

    二、中文部分

    王欣(2014)。MOOC的全球化及對高等教育國際化的影響。蘇州大學學報,教育科學版,第3期,檢自:http://edu.cssn.cn/jyx/jyx_bjjyx/201409/W020140925369637472425.pdf
    王美雅(2005)。概念型創新的動態擴散過程─複雜理論觀點。未出版之博士論文,國立政治大學,科技管理研究所,台北市。
    台灣開放式課程聯盟,2015年5月13日,檢自:http://www.tocwc.org.tw/portal_g5.php?button_num=g5
    余佳恩(2013)。開放教育資源之理論與實踐。未出版之碩士論文,國立政治大學,智慧財產研究所,台北市。
    呂世浩(2015)。別開生面──全球第一門MOOC中文文史課程開課的艱辛與收穫。國家教育研究院教育脈動電子期刊,第1期,檢自:http://pulse.naer.edu.tw/content.aspx?type=B&sid=78
    李威儀(2015年3月)。MOOCs 融入企業教育訓練的最新趨勢。區國良(主持人),臺灣人資的挑戰(研討會),國立交通大學。
    李海碩(2010)。開放式課程(OpenCourseWare)在台灣:交通大學開放式課程之起源、影響、以及台灣開放式課程聯盟之發展。未出版之碩士論文,國立交通大學,教育研究所,新竹市。
    杜依倩(2014)。大學教師參與MOOCs之科技需求及問題研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學,圖書資訊學研究所,台北市。
    育網,2015年5月28日,檢自:http://www.ewant.org/
    周成功(1994)。尼采的狂放世界。載於《複雜—走在秩序與混沌邊緣》(序)。台北:天下文化。
    林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,第3卷,第2期,頁122-136。
    林祐綸(2014)。自我效能和性別差異對於科技接受度之影響:以大規模開放式線上學習環境為例。未出版之碩士論文,國立中央大學,資訊工程學系,桃園縣。
    國立清華大學(2013年1月24日)。「學聯網」可望引爆華語講授課程的線上學習熱潮。檢自:http://www.nthu.edu.tw/newsphoto/102news/hotnews-1020124.php
    張婉菁(2005)。霧裡見花:以複雜科學觀點探討職場女性地位發展。未出版之博士論文,國立中央大學,人力資源管理研究所,桃園縣。
    教育部(2013年1月26日)。教育部推動數位學習「磨課師課程經營國際研討會」今明盛大辦理。檢自:http://www.edu.tw/news1/detail.aspx?Node=1088&Page=26207&wid=6635a4e8-f0de-4957-aa3e-c3b15c6e6ead&Index=1
    陳成宏(2011)。教育行政「潛規則」之理論探討與概念模式建構。當代教育研究季刊,第19卷,第3期,頁121-159。
    游婉琪(2014年6月1日)。教部磨課師計畫「要找對的老師」。聯合晚報,A4版。
    湯偉君、邱美虹(2007)。複雜系統、突現及其對科學教育的啟示。科學教育月刊,第301期,頁17-26。
    黃士哲(2013)。大規模線上課程平台同儕評分機制設計與實作。未出版之碩士論文,國立清華大學,資訊工程學系,新竹市。
    葉重新(2001)。教育研究法。台北:心理出版社。
    鄒景平(2006)。數位學習的四項要素。研習論壇,第71期,頁24-29。
    劉怡甫(2013)。與全球十萬人作同學:談MOOC現況及其發展。評鑑雙月刊,第42 期,檢自:http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2013/03/01/5945.aspx
    劉怡甫(2014)。從antiMOOC風潮談MOOCs轉型與SPOCs擅場。評鑑雙月刊,第48期,檢自:http://epaper.heeact.edu.tw/archive/2014/03/01/6132.aspx
    潘慧玲(1996)。教育研究。載於黃光雄(主編),教育導論(頁 341-368)。台北:師大書苑。
    蔡敦浩、利尚仁、林韶怡(2007)。複雜性科學典範下的創業研究。創業管理研究,第2卷,第1期,頁31-60。
    蔡敦浩、藍紫堂(2004)。新興產業發展的複雜調適系統觀點─以台灣E-Learning產業為例。管理學報,第21卷,第6期,頁715-732。
    學堂在線,2015年5月28日,檢自:http://www.xuetangx.com/
    磨課師分項計畫辦公室,2015年5月28日,檢自:http://taiwanmooc.org/
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    科技管理與智慧財產研究所
    102364108
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0102364108
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2460View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback