English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 93779/124226 (75%)
Visitors : 28855657      Online Users : 437
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/78142
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78142


    Title: 影響使用者行動 App 內購買意願之因素
    Factors Affecting User's Intention to Purchase Within Mobile Applications
    Authors: 洪梓凱
    Hung, Tzu Kai
    Contributors: 梁定澎
    Liang, Ting Peng
    洪梓凱
    Hung, Tzu Kai
    Keywords: 知覺價值
    App 內購買
    互補性
    口碑
    購買意圖
    Perceived Value
    Purchase Intention
    Complementarity
    Word-of-Mouth
    In-App Purchase
    Date: 2015
    Issue Date: 2015-09-02 11:30:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: App 內購買(In-App Purchase, IAP)已成為現今App 營收的主要模式,而過
    去針對此一現象的研究大多集中於遊戲類的App,較少針對其他類型App(工
    具、資訊、社交)進行探討。
    本研究先利用文獻歸納的方式,整理出可能影響使用者App 內購買的因
    素,再透過深度訪談法,針對曾經進行過App 內購買的使用者進行訪問,歸納
    出App 使用動機、販售商品與App 的互補性與口碑情緒三個因素會影響使用者
    對商品的知覺價值與購買意圖,並依此建構本研究的研究模型,並進行實驗設
    計。在實驗中,本研究挑出四種不同類型的App,並以高低互補性、正面口碑
    的有無為操弄變項,搭配App 使用動機來搜集資料並進行分析。
    研究結果發現:(1) 部分App 使用動機會對知覺價值與購買意圖有顯著影響。
    (2) App 與商品的互補性對於知覺價值與購買意圖皆有顯著影響。(3) 口碑對於
    商品的知覺價值有顯著影響,但是對於購買意圖沒有顯著影響。顯示IAP 商品
    是否能與App 有效整合,為App 帶來更多的價值,才是影響使用者購買意圖的
    最大因素。
    In-App purchase(IAP) has become the main revenue model in App market.
    Previous studies on this issue are mostly focused on game Apps, and rarely explored
    other types of Apps such as productivity tools, information or social networking tools.
    In this study, we use literature analysis and in-depth interviews to find factors that
    may affect users’ in-app purchase intention. User motivation, product complementarity,
    and word-of-mouth are found to affect users’ perceived value and in-app purchase
    intention. We developed a theoretical model and designed an experiment to test the
    model. In the experiment, we chose four different types of Apps, designed with different
    levels of complementarity and different sentiment of word-of-mouth (user comments)
    as the treatment.
    The results indicated that: (1) Certain motivations significantly affected the
    perceived value and purchase intention of IAP products. (2) Complementarity between
    IAP products and the App significantly affected the perceived value and purchase
    intentions of IAP product. (3) word-of-mouth significantly affected perceived value but
    not affecting the purchase intention of IAP products.
    Reference: 1. 王旭民. 參考價格建構方式, 脈絡線索對消費者價格認知的影響, 中央大學企研所未出版之碩士論文. 1995.
    2. 王嵩音. (2007). 網路使用之態度, 動機與影響. 資訊社會研究, (12), 57-85.
    3. 甘美玲. "知覺價格, 知覺品質, 知覺價值對購買意願之關係研究-以消費者購買數位內容產品為實證." 成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班 (EMBA) 學位論文 (2006): 1-99.
    4. 翁瑞敏. (2013). 免費增值商業模式之付費因素-以手機APP 遊戲為例. 東海大學企業管理學系學位論文, 1-75.
    5. 張廷宇. (2012). 軟體內購買 (In-App Purchases) 是衝動行為嗎?. 中央大學資訊管理學系學位論文, 1-55.
    6. 黃鈺婷. 影響虛擬道具購買意圖之因素研究─ 以免費線上遊戲為例. 2013.
    7. 黃麗霞. 贈品促銷型式對消費者的知覺價值與購買意願之影響. 2002. PhD Thesis.
    8. 楊子輝. "目標一致性與目標互補性對整合性產品知覺價值之影響-以手機為例." 成功大學電信管理研究所學位論文 (2011): 1-80.
    9. 劉仲矩, & 阮薏樺. (2014). 智慧型行動裝置 App 應用程式使用者知覺價值與滿意度關聯之研究: 使用動機為干擾效果. 輔仁管理評論, 21(1), 87-109.
    10. 蔡珮, & 陳世敏. (1994). 電子佈告欄使用行為與社會臨場感研究-以台大計中 BBS 站為例 (Doctoral dissertation).
    11. 蕭銘鈞, & 周倩. (1997). 台灣大學生網路使用行為, 使用動機, 滿足程度與網路成癮現象之初探 (Doctoral dissertation).
    英文文獻
    1. Aaker, D. A., & Keller, K. L. (1990). Consumer evaluations of brand extensions. The Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 27-41.
    2. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological bulletin, 103(3), 411.
    3. Arndt, J. (1967). Role of product-related conversations in the diffusion of a new product. Journal of marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295.
    4. Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of consumer research, 20(4), 644-656.
    5. Chatterjee P., Hoffman D. L., Novak T. P. (2003), Modeling the clickstream: Implications for web-based advertising efforts. Marketing Sci., 22(4):520–541 Abstract
    6. Chen, Y., & Xie, J. (2008). Online consumer review: Word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Management Science, 54(3), 477-491.
    7. Chu, S. C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47-75.
    8. Deci, Edward L., et al. (1991), "Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective." Educational psychologist, 26(3-4): 325-346.
    9. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of marketing research, 28(3), 307-319.
    10. Dowling, M., Lechner, C., & Thielmann, B. (1998). Convergence–Innovation and change of market structures between television and online services. Electronic Markets, 8(4), 31-35.
    11. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. The annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1-26.
    12. Fairfield, J. (2005). Virtual property. Boston University Law Review, 85(35), 1047.
    13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
    14. Gelb, B. D., & Sundaram, S. (2002). Adapting to “word of mouse”. Business Horizons, 45(4), 21-25.
    15. Gelb, B., & Johnson, M. (1994). Word-of-mouth communication: causes and consequences. Journal of Health Care Marketing, 15(3), 54-58.
    16. Godes, D., & Mayzlin, D. (2004). Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Marketing science, 23(4), 545-560.
    17. Guo, Y., & Barnes, S. (2011). Purchase behavior in virtual worlds: An empirical investigation in Second Life. Information & Management, 48(7), 303-312.
    18. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
    19. Harlam, B. A., Krishna, A., Lehmann, D. R., & Mela, C. (1995). Impact of bundle type, price framing and familiarity on purchase intention for the bundle. journal of Business Research, 33(1), 57-66.
    20. Hui, T. K., & Wan, D. (2007). Factors affecting Internet shopping behaviour in Singapore: gender and educational issues. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3), 310-316.
    21. Kaye, B. K. (1998). Uses and gratifications of the World Wide Web: From couch potato to Web potato. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 6(1), 21-40.
    22. Kim, H. W., Gupta, S., & Koh, J. (2011a). Investigating the intention to purchase digital items in social networking communities: A customer value perspective. Information & Management, 48(6), 228-234.
    23. Kim, H. W., Lee, H. L., & Son, J. E. (2011b, July). An exploratory study on the determinants of smartphone app purchase. In The 11th International DSI and the 16th APDSI Joint Meeting, Taipei, Taiwan.
    24. Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132-135.
    25. Lehdonvirta, V. (2009). Virtual item sales as a revenue model: identifying attributes that drive purchase decisions. Electronic Commerce Research, 9(1-2), 97-113.
    26. Leung, L., & Wei, R. (2000). More than just talk on the move: Uses and gratifications of the cellular phone. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(2), 308-320.
    27. Lim, D., Lee, H., Yoo, J., & Zo, H. (2013). Free to Paid: Purchase and Dropout Behavior of Mobile Application Users. In PACIS (p. 133).
    28. Liu, C. Z., Au, Y. A., & Choi, H. S. (2012). An empirical study of the freemium strategy for mobile apps: Evidence from the google play market, ICIS.
    29. Monroe, K. B., & Krishnan, R. (1985). The effect of price on subjective product evaluations. Perceived quality, 1, 209-232.
    30. Nambisan, S. (2002). Complementary product integration by high-technology new ventures: The role of initial technology strategy. Management Science, 48(3), 382-398.
    31. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw.
    32. Park, B. W., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Exploring the value of purchasing online game items. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2178-2185.
    33. Raghubir, P., & Corfman, K. (1999). When do price promotions affect pretrial brand evaluations?. Journal of Marketing Research, 36(2), 211-222.
    34. Sengupta, S. (1998). Some approaches to complementary product strategy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 352-367.
    35. Sinha, I., & Smith, M. F. (2000). Consumers' perceptions of promotional framing of price. Psychology & Marketing, 17(3), 257-275.
    36. Spiliotopoulos, T., & Oakley, I. (2013, April). Understanding motivations for Facebook use: Usage metrics, network structure, and privacy. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3287-3296). ACM.
    37. Stott, K. & Walker, A. (1995), Teams, Teamwork & Teambuilding: The manager's Complete Guide to Teams in Organizations, New York: Prentice Hall.
    38. Sweeney, J. C., & Soutar, G. N. (2001). Consumer perceived value: The development of a multiple item scale. Journal of retailing, 77(2), 203-220.
    39. Telser, L. G. (1979). A theory of monopoly of complementary goods. Journal of Business, 52(2), 211-230.
    40. Teo, T. S., Lim, V. K., & Lai, R. Y. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega, 27(1), 25-37.
    41. Westbrook, R. A. (1987). Product/consumption-based affective responses and postpurchase processes. Journal of marketing research, 24(3), 258-270.
    42. Wortzel, L. (1979). Multivariate analysis. Upper saddle river, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    43. Yee, N. (2006). Motivations for play in online games. CyberPsychology & behavior, 9(6), 772-775.
    44. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理研究所
    102356026
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1023560261
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    026101.pdf2523KbAdobe PDF301View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback