 |
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46214702
Online Users : 762
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/78516
|
| Title: | 《民主評論》的新儒家與《自由中國》的自由主義者關係變化初探：以徐復觀與殷海光為中心的討論 |
| Other Titles: | Initial Exploration of the Relationship Change between New-Confucianism of ";The Democratic Review";and Liberalists of ";Free China";: Taking Hsu Fu-Kuan and Yin Hai-guang as the Focuses |
| Authors: | Su, Jui-Chiang
蘇瑞鏘 |
| Contributors: | 歷史系 |
| Keywords: | 民主評論;自由中國;徐復觀;殷海光
The Democratic Review;Free China;Hsu, Fu-Kuan;Yin, Hai-Guang |
| Date: | 2011-03 |
| Issue Date: | 2015-09-15 15:39:34 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 《民主評論》與《自由中國》創刊的背景相當類似，其民主與反共的目標也相同，早年主要成員的私交也不錯，然後來何以關係惡化？本文從雙方內在哲學與文化立場的差異、外在政治形勢的變動，乃至個人的恩怨等面向，分析彼此關係的變化。其中，外在政治形勢變動的視角，乃前人較少分析的面向。本文以為，《民主評論》與《自由中國》原本的哲學與文化立場早已隱含矛盾。但在一九四九年創刊之初，中共政權是兩個刊物共同的「主要矛盾」，哲學與文化立場的差異只是兩個刊物間的「次要矛盾」。然到了一九五○年代中期以後，臺灣來自中共政權的威脅明顯減低，原本《自由中國》與《民主評論》已存在哲學與文化立場的「次要矛盾」遂躍升為「主要矛盾」，雙方關係於是逐漸惡化。再加上兩個刊物的成員間存在一些個人恩怨等因素，到了一九五○年代後期，終因爆發激烈的民主與傳統論戰，導致雙方正式的決裂。
”The Democratic Review” and ”Free China`s” background of beginning publication was similar, their goals of democracy and anti-communism were the same, and the personal friendship among the main members in their early years was good, but why did the relation deteriorate later? The thesis analyzed the change of mutual relationship from the dimensions of internal differences of philosophic and cultural standpoints, external change of political situation, and personal conflict. Among them, the visual angle of external change of political situation was the dimension that previous researchers` did little analysis. The thesis believed that the original philosophic and cultural standpoints of ”The Democratic Review” and ”Free China” already had contradiction. However, in the beginning of 1949 when they began publication, Chinese Communist Regime was the two periodicals` common ”major contradiction, ”and the differences of philosophic and cultural standpoints were only ”minor contradiction. ” Yet after mid 1950s, in Taiwan the thread from Chinese Communist Regime obviously lessened, and the ”minor contradiction” of philosophic and cultural standpoints originally existed between ”The Demoratic Review” and ”Free China” thus leaped to be the ”major contradiction,” and therefore, both parties` relationship gradually deteriorated. Moreover, owing to personal conflict among the members of two periodicals, the intense controversy of democracy and tradition exploded finally in late 1950s, resulting in both parties’ formal breakup. |
| Relation: | 思與言：人文與社會科學雜誌, 49(1), 7-44 |
| Data Type: | article |
| Appears in Collections: | [歷史學系] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Description |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| 7-44.pdf | | 3953Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1652 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
