政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/79013
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109951/140892 (78%)
Visitors : 46212894      Online Users : 1089
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/79013


    Title: 專家與新手教師在班級經營的知識結構差異:以口試題目檢驗之
    Other Titles: Analysis of Difference in the Knowledge Structure of Expert and Novice Teachers in Classroom Management: Examined by Oral Exam Questions
    Authors: 賴慧珠;胡悅倫
    Lai, Hui-Chu;Hu, Yueh-Luen
    Contributors: 教育系
    Keywords: 專家教師;新手教師;班級經營;知識結構;路徑搜尋法
    Expert teachers;Novice teachers;Classroom management;Knowledge structure;Pathfinder
    Date: 2010-03
    Issue Date: 2015-10-20 17:26:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在運用路徑搜尋法(Pathfinder)測量專家與新手教師在班級經營知識結構的差異,試圖建構評量教師知識結構的有效工具。 本研究以臺中縣國民中學為抽樣範圍,採立意抽樣共得專家教師35名及新手教師39名。研究工具有二項:33題班級經營口試題目與教室管理效能量表。結果可得三項量化指數:接近性資料指數(PRX);圖形理論距離指數(GTD);相似性指數(PFC)。另外,專家與新手教師之路徑搜尋網路圖亦一併呈現。 根據資料分析,本研究結果發現:一;專家教師與新手教師在班級經營知識結構上呈現差異性存在;二;專家教師比新手教師的知識結構圖更趨近參照結構;三;路徑搜尋法對專家與新手教師具有區別效力;四;班級經營知識結構三項量化指數與班級經營效能具有相關存在,其中以PRX指數關係最密切。
    The purpose of the study is employ Pathfinder to measure the difference that lies within the knowledge structure of expert and novice teachers in terms of classroom management, attempting to construct an effective instrument to evaluate the knowledge structure of teachers. The study draws a sample of 35 expert teachers and 39 novice teachers from the junior high schools in Taichung County through judgmental sampling. Two instruments are put to use: an inventory of 33 classroom management oral exam questions and inventory of effectiveness of classroom management. Interviewees are asked to categorize the questions and analyze the knowledge structure through Pathfinder. The three quantitative indexes of classroom management knowledge structure are generated as follows: proximity index(PRX), graph-theoretic distance(GTD), pathfinder network closeness index(PFC). The pathfinder network of expert and novice teachers are also provided. Conclusions of the research are as follows: 1.Expert and novice teachers are significantly different in classroom management knowledge structurally. 2.The knowledge structure map of expert teachers resembles the reference comparatively more than that of novice teachers. 3.The Pathfinder is a valid tool to discriminate the expert and novice teachers. 4.The three quantitative indexes of classroom management knowledge structure are significantly correlated to classroom management effectiveness, with PRX being the most closely correlated.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 33, 1, 1-31
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Education] Periodical Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    131.pdf10082KbAdobe PDF2534View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback