English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46294457      Online Users : 1376
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80170


    Title: A Study on the Citizen Participatory Trial in Korea
    Authors: 權五杰
    Kwon, Oh Geol
    Contributors: 法學院
    Keywords: Jury Trial in Korea;Korean Criminal Procedure;Judge’s exclusion;Appeal by the prosecutor;The advisory effect of the verdict
    Date: 2012-03-17
    Issue Date: 2015-12-31 10:09:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: In Korea there have been several democratic claims since 1900’s with the remarkable economic growth, one of which is the fairness of judgement through citizens’ participation in criminal procedures.Korean criminal system introduced a new trial system called “Citizens’ Participation in the Trial System” in 2008. From the historical view points, Korean criminal judicial system began through the foundation of “the Supreme Court’s Judicial Reform Committee” in 2003. One of the results, achieved by the Judicial Reforms, was the enactment of “The act on Citizen Participation in Criminal Trials.” According to this new trial system, common people began to participate in some of criminal trials not as an object, but as the subject of the criminal procedures.But the prospects for this jury trial system in korea are not bright. Because the Result of korean jury trial during 2008-2010 has so many problems.Above all most important problems are as follows1. Low rates of application to the jury trial2. Hgh rates of withdrawl of application by the accused3. High rates of exclusion by judge4. The excessive appeals by the prosecutorAfter the testing period (2008-2012), we had to decide whether we should continue this new system or not. Supposing that the new model is not inconsistent with the Korean culture, is the new Korean jury trial system thought to be suitable for us?Thus at this time, I am going to present some methods to solve current problem in korean jury trial system.
    Relation: 後繼受時代的東亞法文化 : 東亞法哲學研討會. 第八屆
    主辦單位:國立政治大學法學院
    舉辦日期:2012.03.17-2012.03.18
    Data Type: conference
    Appears in Collections:[2012東亞法哲學研討會] 會議論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML21212View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback