English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 71563/104432 (69%)
造訪人次 : 19151904      線上人數 : 168
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧:
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號",以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋,建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位,可獲得較完整資料
  • 進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 傳播博士班 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/80251
    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80251


    題名: 從中間開始:論日常中的媒介使用
    Beginning in the middle: Media use in everyday life
    作者: 吳姿嫻
    Wu, Tzu Hsien
    貢獻者: 鍾蔚文
    Chung, Wei Wen
    吳姿嫻
    Wu, Tzu Hsien
    關鍵詞: 媒介使用
    日常生活
    塊莖
    生成
    media use
    everyday life
    rhizome
    becoming
    日期: 2014
    上傳時間: 2016-01-04 16:47:59 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 受益德勒茲(Deleuze)的「塊莖」(Rhizome)觀點之啟發,本研究 重新思索如何看待日常中的媒介使用。「使用」之所以複雜,關係到「日 常」有其尋常與變動之處;然而,尋常與變動背後所反映的,是不斷「生 成」(becoming)的狀態,生成中保有變動、聚合、再變動、又聚合,故 從「使用」出發,主張媒介、使用者與脈絡為媒介使用中不可或缺且不 可分割的重要環節,並從「變」著手,以追索媒介使用中的「生成」,初 探媒介使用裡「變中有序」的轉化,勾勒媒介使用中那些交引纏繞在一 起的經驗之流,探究日常生活中媒介使用的生成情況。

    本研究發現,透過捕捉生成過程,除了更能突顯媒介、使用者、脈 絡從來不是單獨運作之外,更能有助於收攏媒介使用的諸多組合關係及 其痕跡。更有趣的是,即使是習以為常的媒介使用,一旦有任何些微變 動,則媒介使用底下那些潛伏的影響因子便順勢萌生,轉化原先的使用, 促成行為上或意義上再次開展出不同的組合與張力關係。循此,本研究 一方面深入描繪使用者之所思、為何為,另一方面亦窺見無中生有的媒 介使用。
    參考文獻: 丁興祥、張慈宜、賴誠斌等譯(2002)。《生命史與心理傳記學——理論與方法的探討》。台北:遠流。(原書Runyan, W. [1982]. Life histories and psychobiography.)
    也斯(1996)。《越界書簡》。香港:青文書屋。
    中央社(2013/01/15)。〈導航出錯 比利時婦開車逾千哩〉。取自:http://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E5%B0%8E%E8%88%AA%E5%87%BA%E9%8C%AF-%E6%AF%94%E5%88%A9%E6%99%82%E5%A9%A6%E9%96%8B%E8%BB%8A%E9%80%BE%E5%8D%83%E5%93%A9-144409386.html
    今日新聞網NOWnews.com(2012年5月8日)。〈知名「Instagram」照相軟體 從虛擬變實體概念相機!〉,取自http://www.nownews.com/2012/05/08/91-2811746.htm
    方怡潔、郭彥君譯(2009)。《後事實追尋:兩個國家、四個十年、一位人類學家》。台北:群學。(原書Geertz, C. [1995]. After the fact: Two countries, Four decades, one anthropologist.)
    王志弘(2002)。〈技術中介的人與自我:網際空間、分身組態與記憶裝置〉,《資訊社會研究》,3: 1-24。
    王彩鸝(2011/05/18)。手機沒帶、沒電、沒接 9成青少年焦慮。NOWnews 今日新聞網。取自:http://mag.udn.com/mag/life/storypage.jsp?f_ART_ID=319280
    王嵩音譯(1993)。《傳播研究里程碑》。台北:遠流。(原書Lowery, S. A., & DeFleur, M. L. [1988]. Milestones in Mass Communication Research: Media Effects.)
    宅宅新聞(2013年8月23日)。〈超復古《Instagram社交拍立得》實機曝光 2014年初正式開賣~〉,取自http://news.gamme.com.tw/557143
    朱光明等譯(2007)。《如何做質的研究》。北京:中國輕工業出版社。(原書Hatch, A. [2002]. Doing qualitative research in education settings.)
    朱華瑄(2007)。《從部落格的物質形式看部落客的自我技藝實作》。清華大學社會所碩士論文。
    何定照、高瑟濡(2007)。《液態之愛:論人際紐帶的脆弱》,台北:商周出版。(原書Bauman. Z. [2003]. Liquid Love: On the Frailty of Human Bonds.)
    吳芝儀(2005)。〈敘事研究的方法論探討〉。收錄於齊力、林本炫(編),《質性研究方法與資料分析》(頁145-188)。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
    吳姿嫻(2007)。《MSN與日常生活》。世新大學公共傳播暨廣告學系所碩士論文。
    吳姿嫻(2011)。〈論「新媒介科技迷」〉,《中華傳播學刊》,19: 97-146。
    李宗薇(2012)。〈數位教學理論:網路與新科技對教育的衝擊〉,引自:http://phpsrv.nutn.edu.tw/~tald/act.php?act=view&id=6&no=60
    周世箴譯(2006)。《我們賴以生存的譬喻》。台北:聯經。(原書Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. [1980]. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.)
    周群英譯(2005)。《日常生活與文化理論》台北:韋伯。(原書Highmore, B. [2004]. Everyday life and cultural theory: An introduction. New York: Routledge.)
    林文源(2008)。〈飄移之作之方法論:初論〉。收錄於周平、蔡政宏(編),《日常生活的質性研究》(頁193-220)。嘉義:南華大學教育社會學研究所。
    林東泰(1999)。《大眾傳播理論》。台北:師大書苑。
    柯裕棻(2003/12/19),〈自己的房間〉(三少四壯集),《中國時報》人間副刊。
    高穎超(2007)。〈做兵「轉大人」:田野邂逅的能與不能〉。收錄於謝國雄(編)《以身為度如是我做:田野工作的教與學》(頁93-121)。臺北:群學。
    梅干(2013/04/05)。(我的智障型手機與我的智慧型生活〉,梅問題教學網。取自http://www.minwt.com/ios/7537.html
    畢恆達(2000)。〈家的意義〉,《應用心理研究》,8: 55-56。
    陳世敏譯(1994)。《美國大眾傳播思潮:從摩斯到麥克魯漢》,台北:遠流。(原書Czitrom, D. [1982]. Media and American mind: From Morse to McLuhan. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.)
    陳玉箴譯(2003)。《媒介概念十六講》。台北:韋伯。(原書Silverstone, R. [1999]. Why study the media? London: Sage.)
    陳惠萍(2012)。〈Chapter 9性別與智慧住家:女性主義的科技研究〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲(編),《智慧生活家科技》(頁204-225)。台北:台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。
    陶振超(2011a)。〈媒介訊息如何獲得注意力:突出或相關?認知取徑媒體研究之觀點〉,《新聞學研究》,107: 245-290。
    陶振超(2011b)。〈脈絡在媒介訊息處理中所扮演的角色:認知與情境觀點〉,《傳播研究與實踐》,1(2): 37-47.
    麥永雄(2007a)。〈光滑空間與塊莖思維:德勒茲的數字媒介詩學〉,《文藝研究》,1: 75-84。取自:http://www.xqnwh.com/2011/0816/4315.html
    麥永雄(2007b)。《德勒茲與當代性─西方後結構主義思潮研究》。桂林:廣西師範大學出版社。
    馮建三譯(1995)。《電視、觀眾與文化研究》。台北:遠流。(原書Morley, D. [1992]. Television, audiences & cultural studies. London: Routledge.)
    黃月純(2001)。(生命史研究在成人教育上的應用〉,《成人教育學刊》,5:219-247。
    黃厚銘(2007)。〈導讀─液態之愛的流轉於凝固〉,收錄於《液態之愛:論人際紐帶的脆弱》(頁3-14)。台北:商周出版。
    楊仁達(2011)。〈大家一起看的電視—Social TV〉,《創新發現誌》,第 42期。取自:http://ideas.org.tw/magazine_article.php?f=20
    楊志弘、周金福譯(2001)。《大眾傳播理論:基礎、發展與未來》。台北:華泰。(原書Baran, S. J., & Davis, D. K. [2000]. Mass Communication theory: Foundations, ferment, and future.)。
    楊凱麟(2003)〈德勒茲「思想─影像」或「思想=影像」之條件及問題性〉,《台大文史哲學報》,59:337-368。
    雷建軍(2007)。《視頻互動媒介》。中國:清華大學出版社。
    廖俊峰、陸敬互、傅立成(2012)。〈Chapter 6 多媒體娛樂、數位通訊與智慧客廳〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲(編),《智慧生活家科技》(頁130-159)。台北:台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。
    廖俊峰、陸敬互、傅立成(2012)。〈多媒體娛樂、數位通訊與智慧客廳〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲(編),《智慧生活家科技》(頁130-159)。台北:台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。
    劉建基譯(2003)。《關鍵詞─文化與社會的詞彙》。台北:巨流。(原書 R. Williams [1976]. Keywords: A vocabulary of culture and society. New York: Oxford University Press.)
    潘淑滿(2003)。《質性研究:理論與應用》。台北:心理。
    鄭明萱譯(2006)。《認識媒體:人的延伸》。台北:貓頭鷹。(原書McLuhan, M. [1964]. Understanding media: The extensions of men.)
    盧嵐蘭(2005)。《媒介消費-閱聽人與社會》。台北:揚智。
    賴彥如、周素卿(2012)。〈Chapter 7主食、情境感知與智慧廚房〉。收錄於周素卿、劉佩玲(編),《智慧生活家科技》(頁160-183)。台北:台灣大學智慧生活科技整合與創新研究中心。
    龍年出版社編輯委員會編譯(1976)。〈混雜的能量〉。收錄於《傳播怪物麥克魯漢》(頁107-115)。台北:龍年出版社。(原文McLuhan, M. [nd].)
    顏學誠(2008)。〈專家、物性、身體感:茶葉比賽中的社會秩序〉。收錄於余舜德(編)《體物入微:物與身體感的研究》(頁405-429)。新竹:清華大學出版社。
    羅世宏譯(2000)。《傳播理論:起源、方法與應用》。台北:五南。(原書Severin, W., & Tankard, J. W., Jr. [1998]. Communication theories: Origins, methods, and uses in the mass media; 4th ed.)。
    龔宜君(2013/05/20)。〈你的寫作風格是「凡骨還是廢物」?〉。取自:http://twstreetcorner.org/2013/05/20/gongyijun/
    Abercrombie, N., & Longhurst, B. (1998). Audience: A sociological theory of performance and imagination. London: Sage.
    Ang, I. (1995). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodrama imagination. London: Methuen.
    Appadurai, A. (1995). Playing with modernity: The decolonization of Indian cricket. In C. A. Breckenridge (Ed.), Consuming modernity: Public culture in a south asian world. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Bakardjieva, M. (2003). Virtual togetherness: An everyday-life perspective. Media, Culture & society, 25, 291-313.
    Bakardjieva, M. (2005). Internet society: The Internet in everyday life. London : Sage.
    Baudrillard, J. (1994). Simulacra and simulation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
    Bausinger, H. (1984). Media, technology and everyday life. Media, Culture and Society, 6, 343-351.
    Bilton, N. (2013, September 1). Disruptions: More connected, yet more alone, The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/09/01/disruptions-more-connected-yet-more-alone/?_r=0
    Bolter, J., & Grusin, R. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge Ma: The MIT Press.
    Bruni, F.(2013, September 2).Traveling without seeing, The New York Times. Retrieved from: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/09/03/opinion/bruni-traveling-without-seeing.html?_r=0
    Bull, M. (2004). To each their own bubble: Mobile space of sound in the city. In N. Couldry & A. McCarthy (Eds.), MediaSpace: Place, scale and culture in a media age (pp. 275-293). London: Routledge.
    Carey, J. W. (1989). Communication as culture: Essays on media and society. NY : Routledge.
    Chee, S. A., Zaphiris, P., & Wilson, S. (2010). Computer games and sociocultural play: An activity theoretical perspective. Games and Culture. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://gac.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/03/16/1555412009360411.full.pdf+html
    de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life (S. Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
    Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.
    Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
    Dickey, S. (1997). Anthropology and its contributions to studies of mass media. International social science journal, 49, 413-427.
    Farman, J. (2011). Introduction: The pathways of locative media. In Mobile Interface Theory: Embodied Space and Locative Media(pp.1-15). New York: Routledge.
    Fiske, J. (1989). Understanding popular culture. London: Routledge.
    Gosling, V. K., & Crawford, G. (2010). Game scenes: Theorizing digital game audiences. Games and culture. Retrieved July 2, 2010, from http://gac.sagepub.com/content/early/2010/03/16/1555412010364979
    Gripenberg, P. (2002). Living with IT: Uses and interpretations of computers in the home and family context, ECIS 2002: Gdańsk, Poland.
    Habib, L. (2001, June). Computers in the home: Domestic technology and the process of domestication. Paper presented at the 9th European Conference on Information Systems. Retrieved November 7, 2006, from http://csrc.lse.ac.uk/asp/aspecis/20010039.pdf
    Haddon, L. (2003). Domestication and mobile telephony. In J. Katz (Ed.), Machines that become us: The social context of personal communication technology (pp. 43-56). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
    Haddon, L. (2006). The contribution of domestication research to in-home computing and media consumption. The Information Society, 22, 195-203.
    Haddon, L. (2007). Roger Silverstone's legacies: Domestication. New media & society, 9(1): 25-32.
    Heidegger, M. (1992). The question concerning technology. In D. F. Krell (Ed.), Basic writings: Ten key essays (pp.307-341). San Francisco: Harprer.
    Hirsch, E. (1992). The long term and the short term of domestic consumption: An ethnographic case study. In R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies. London: Routledge.
    Hirsch, E. (1998). New technologies and domestic consumption. In C. Geraghty & D. Lusted (Eds.), The television studies book (pp.158-174). London: Routledge.
    Idhe, D. (1990). Technology and the lifeworld: From Garden to Earth.
    Jenkins, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans & participatory Culture. NY: Routledge.
    Jenkins, H. (2006a). Convergence culture: Where old and new media collide. New York: New York University Press.
    Jenkins, H. (2006b). Fans, bloggers, and gamers: Essays on participatory culture. New York & London: New York University Press.
    Katz, E., Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1974). Utilization of mass communication by the individual. In J. G. Blumler & E. Katz (Eds.), The uses of mass communications: Current perspectives on gratifications research (Vol. III, pp. 19-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
    INSIDE(2013/03/21)。〈親愛的,我把我的 iPhone 閹割了!〉,取自:http://www.inside.com.tw/2013/03/21/distraction-free-iphone?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+inside-blog-taiwan+%28%E7%B6%B2%E8%B7%AF%E8%B6%A8%E5%8B%A2%E8%A1%8C%E9%8A%B7%E8%88%87%E9%96%8B%E7%99%BC%29(原文Knapp, J. [2013/03/14]. The distraction-free iPhone (or ‘Why I’m happier since I disabled Safari’). Retrieved from: https://medium.com/life-hacks/80f8d525b0d8)
    Larsen, B. S. (2000). Radio as ritual: An approach to everyday use of radio. Nordicom review, 21, 259-274.
    Latour, B. (2000/2004).〈直線進步或交引纏繞〉(Progress or Entanglement?),收錄於吳嘉苓、傅大為、雷祥麟(編)《科技渴望社會》(頁79-105)。台北:群學。
    McLuhan, M. (1964/1994). Understanding media: The extensions of man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    McLuhan, M. (1970). Culture is our business. McGraw-Hill Book Company.
    McLuhan, M. (1995). The Medium is the Message. In E. McLuhan & F. Zingrone (Eds.), Essential McLuhan. Toronto: Anansi.
    McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding Me: Lectures and Interviews. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    McLuhan, M., & Fiore, Q.(1968/1997). War and peace in the global village. San Francisco: Hardwired.
    Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). The phenomenology of perception. (trans. By C. Smith) Routledge. Retrieved from https://wiki.brown.edu/confluence/download/attachments/73535007/Phenomenology+of+Perception.pdf
    Meyrowitz, J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Morley, D. (1986). Family television. London: Routledge.
    Morley, D. (2000). Home territories: Media, mobility and identity. London and New York: Routledge.
    Morley, D. (2003). What’s ‘home’ got to do with it? European journal of cultural studies, 6, 435-458.
    Morley, D. (2007). Media, modernity and technology: The geography of the new. London: Routledge.
    Morley, D., & Silverstone, R. (1991). Communication and context: Ethnographic perspective on the media effect. In K. B. Jessen & N. W. Jankowski (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative methodologies for mass communication research (pp.149-162). NY & London: Routledge.
    Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 35-52). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
    Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
    Pisters, P. (2008, May 25). Manifesto for a schizo-analysis of media culture. Retrieved from Masters of media http://mastersofmedia.hum.uva.nl/2008/05/25/manifesto-for-a-schizo-analysis-of-media-culture/
    Poster, M. (2002). Everyday (virtual) life. New literary history, 33, 743-760.
    Press, A. (1992). Women watching television. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
    Richardson, L. (2000). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Scannell, P. (1988). Radio times: The temporal arrangements of broadcasting in the modern world. In P. Drummond & R. Pateson (Eds.), Television and its audience: International research perspectives (pp. 15-29). London: British Film Institue.
    Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
    Silverstone, R. (2002). Complicity and collusion in the mediation of everyday life. New literary history, 33, 761-780.
    Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of household. In R. Silverstone, E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies (pp.15-31). London: Routledge.
    Sotamaa, O. (2010). When the game is not enough: Motivations and practices among computer game modding culture. Games and Culture, 5(3), 256-277.
    Spigel, L. (2001). Media homes: Then and now. International journal of cultural studies, 4(4), 385-411.
    Stiegler, B. (1998). Technics and time: The fault of epimetheus (Trans., R. Beardsworth & G. Collins). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
    Tierny, W. G. (2000). Undaunted courage. Life history and the postmodern challenge. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Turkle, S. (1984). The second self: Computers and the human spirit. New York: Simon & Schuster.
    Urry, J. (2002, May). Mobility and proximity. Sociology, 36(2), 255-274.
    Virilio, P. (1994). The Vision Machine. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
    Virilio, P. (1990). L'Inertie polaire. Paris: Christian Bourgois.
    Winocur, R. (2005). Radio and everyday life: Uses and meanings in the domestic sphere. Television New Media, 6(3), 319-332.
    Yoshimi, S. (1999). Made in Japan: The cultural politics of “home electrification” in postwar Japan. Media, culture & society, 21, 149-171.
    Zimmerman, H. T. (2004). A case study of a family’s digital technology use. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Learning Sciences Table of Contents, California, 646-646.
    描述: 博士
    國立政治大學
    新聞學系
    96451504
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096451504
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[傳播博士班] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    150401.pdf3582KbAdobe PDF254檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋