English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23488682      Online Users : 234
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/80699


    Title: Problematic Federal District Court Approaches to the Joinder Clause under the America Invents Act
    Authors: 陳秉訓
    Chen, Ping-Hsun
    Contributors: 科管智財所
    Date: 2016-01
    Issue Date: 2016-01-21 17:36:02 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Before 35 U.S.C. § 299 was enacted, a minority of district courts had permitted joinder of independent defendants merely because the same patent was infringed. That gave a great incentive to non-practicing entities to sue as many defendants as possible in one suit. To resolve this problem, Congress enacted § 299(b) to abrogate the minority view of joinder. In addition, the Federal Circuit in In re EMC created a test requiring finding of “an actual link between the facts underlying each claim of infringement.” The Federal Circuit provided six EMC factors for lower courts to determine permissive joinder. However, the Eastern District of Texas has relied primarily on the “use of identically sourced parts” factor to find joinder, while other district courts have denied joinder of direct competitors. Particularly, in mobile phone technology cases, the Eastern District of Texas has permitted joinder merely because the same hardware component is used, while other courts have found misjoinder merely because mobile devices of one manufacturer’s operational system are not the same as mobile devices of another manufacturer’s operational system. To resolve the inconsistency, this article offers a “certain connection” approach in light of Congress’ intent and the In re EMC decision. The approach focuses on connections between the infringement claims and the independent defendants.
    Relation: IDEA: The Journal of the Franklin Pierce Center For Intellectual Property, Vol.56, No.1, pp.99-161
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[科技管理與智慧財產研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    408785.pdf1080KbAdobe PDF378View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback