English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91280/121421 (75%)
Visitors : 25392585      Online Users : 88
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81370


    Title: 住宅市場處置效應之研究
    Other Titles: Disposition Effect on the Housing Markets
    Authors: 林左裕;傅聖元
    Contributors: 地政系
    Keywords: 處置效應;行為財務學;展望理論;不動產市場
    Disposition effect;Behavior finance;Prospect theory;Real estate market
    Date: 2015-09
    Issue Date: 2016-02-19 16:16:00 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「處置效應」(Disposition Effect)在證券市場之文獻上為股市投資人在利得區間有風險嫌惡,且在損失區間有損失嫌惡的傾向時,面對持股會呈現「出盈保虧」或「處分獲利、續抱虧損」的投資決策傾向,但在房地產市場的探討卻鮮見相關研究。本研究選取中古屋之成交量為觀察對象,當市場報酬率有所變動,投資人的買賣行為將會反映在成交量上,故由成交量的變化方向與幅度即可推論出相關之處置效應。研究結果指出,在前期報酬率持續為正或由負轉正時,出盈現象顯著存在於台北市中古屋市場;而前期持續的負報酬率會使成交量萎縮,亦顯著呈現保虧效應。在實務意涵上,政府的奢侈稅政策並未控制高漲的房價,僅是使投資者延後出脫導致成交量萎縮,可看出奢侈稅實施後的中古屋市場呈現價漲量縮的現象,並未符合政府原先預期的抑制房價上漲效應。本研究成果可提供政府未來修訂不動產稅制及貨幣政策之有效參考。
    The "Disposition Effect" indicates that investors in the stock markets tend to sell to realize the profit as they are "in the money", and hold securities to avoid loss as they are "out of the money". Similar investors' behaviors in the real estate markets are rarely explored. In Taiwan, continuously surging home prices have severely deteriorated home affordability. Underlying factors causing the high housing prices include low tax rate and low interest rates. To analyze investor behavior in the housing markets, this study analyzes the transaction volume in the existing housing market in relation to market return. The empirical results show that investors in the existing housing markets tend to sell to realize profits as the returns stay positive or turn from negative to positive. However, investors tend to hold to avoid loss as the returns stay negative. This conclusion is consistent with the investor behavior of stock markets. The analytical results of this study also imply that the "Luxury Tax" imposed on short-term real estate investment only postpones their timing to sell. However, housing prices continue to appreciate. Results of this study have important implications for policy makers and investors for decision making in the future.
    Relation: 都市與計劃Cityand Planning, 42, 3, 273-294
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[地政學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    273-294.pdf2276KbAdobe PDF283View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback