English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 11 |  Items with full text/Total items : 88613/118155 (75%)
Visitors : 23471383      Online Users : 261
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 法學院 > 法律學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/81407
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/81407


    Title: 投票行賄罪的犯罪性質-兼評最高法院九十九年度第五次刑事庭會議(一)決議要旨
    Other Titles: The Study of Interference with Voting ─ Also Discussing the Resolution Passed by the 2010 Fifth Criminal Divisions Conference of the Supreme Court of the R.O.C.
    Authors: 李聖傑
    Lee, Sheng-chieh
    Contributors: 法律系
    Keywords: 投票行賄罪;賄選罪;集合犯;接續犯;行為單數
    offences of interference with voting;collective offence;consecutive offence;singular of act
    Date: 2011-09
    Issue Date: 2016-02-25 12:25:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 最高法院九十九年度第五次刑事庭會議(一)經由刑事庭會議,就投票行賄行為(公職人員選舉罷免法第九十九條、刑法第一四四條)的犯罪類型,以決議方式主張投票行賄罪在犯罪性質上,除符合傳統典型接續犯之要件外,應以一罪一罰為論罪原則。這樣的表達,與國內多數學說認為投票行賄罪為集合犯,顯然有相當的差異。為了讓最高法院九十九年度第五次刑事庭會議(一)之決議,能夠與相關學說或部分實務判決有銜接可能,本文以投票行賄罪的相關判決作為分析對象,論述投票行賄罪的犯罪性質,重新解構「接續犯」與「集合犯」的概念,呈現「接續犯」與「集合犯」的關係,希望在新法的實際過渡應用中,思考最高法院九十九年度第五次刑事庭會議決議的適當性,而提供學說與實務的對話參考。
    The Supreme Court concluded in the 5th criminal divisions conference last year that offenses of interference with voting in the Article 144 of Criminal Law should in principle be sentenced offense by offense, unless it can be considered as a continuing offense. The opinion implied in this conclusion differs significantly from the mainstream theory, by which the offenses in the Article 144 of the Criminal Law are considered as a collective offense. This essay, by analyzing courts' decisions, tries to discuss the nature of the offenses of interference with voting, and reconstruct the core ideas of the continuing and collective offense. The aim is to clarify the relation between the two types of offenses theoretically and practically.
    Relation: 高大法學論叢,7(1),1-50
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    3-52.pdf1072KbAdobe PDF173View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback