English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 91280/121421 (75%)
Visitors : 25424913      Online Users : 94
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/82691


    Title: 兩岸關係規範論述:全球社區與辯證哲學之解結
    Other Titles: The Cross-Strait Relation and Its Normative Discourse: The Settling Approach of Global Community and Dialectical Philosophy
    Authors: 江和華;張昌吉
    Jiang, He-Hua;Chang, Chun-Chig
    Contributors: 勞工所
    Keywords: 全球社區;規範;兩岸關係;辯證哲學
    global community;norm;Cross-Strait relation;Dialectical Philosophy
    Date: 2014-06
    Issue Date: 2016-03-16 16:03:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 兩岸簽署ECFA是台海雙方關係發展的歷史性里程碑,本文擬闡述與探討:一、論述新時代兩岸關係的性質、定位及特色;二、當前兩岸關係交流基礎在於求同存異的九二共識,它既是緩和兩岸關係之基礎,並為國際間美中台三方所認同者。本文提出兩岸規範論述以為九二共識在廿一世紀的新版本,亦即九二共識可有更豐富內涵以及與時俱進詮釋;三、本文提出全球社區與辯證哲學觀點,以尋索兩岸爭議的解決方案與途徑。前者有全球新實體的本體論色彩,後者則具辯證哲學方法論屬性。
    The mutually signed Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement (ECFA) of 2010 marked a historic milestone for the development of Cross-Strait relations. This article intends to explore issues such as the nature, orientation and character of the Cross-Strait relation in the new era and the 92-Consensus "agree to disagree" on which the base of exchange for Cross-Strait relations mainly relies. The 92-Consensus is both the foundation of relaxing the tension of Cross-Strait relations and a consensus accepted by U.S., China, Taiwan and international society. This article presents the normative discourse in order to create a new version of the 92-Consensus in the 21st century. Namely, the 92-Consensus may bring the meanings as time passed. Finally, this article offers the concept of global community to search for a settlement of disputes between Taiwan and China. It will combine the ontological color of a new global entity and the methodological character of dialectics.
    Relation: 人文社會科學研究, 8(2), 61-81
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2014.8(2)4
    DOI: 10.6284/NPUSTHSSR.2014.8(2)4
    Appears in Collections:[勞工研究所] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    6181.pdf1142KbAdobe PDF461View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback