政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/83823
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 109952/140887 (78%)
Visitors : 46338659      Online Users : 1191
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/83823


    Title: 民主之進程:台灣與墨西哥發展經驗之比較研究
    Authors: 蔡東杰
    Contributors: 鄧中堅
    蔡東杰
    Keywords: 台灣
    墨西哥
    民主化
    現代化
    政治經濟學
    政黨體系
    Taiwan
    Mexico
    democratization
    modernization
    political economy
    party system
    Date: 2000
    Issue Date: 2016-04-01 17:12:40 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 隨著一九八○年代「第三波」民主化浪潮的來臨,學者們對於第三世界國家的關注焦點乃不再僅限於經濟層面,同時也開始重視其政治發展過程以及與經濟活動間的互動關係。特別是針對東亞與拉丁美洲這兩個發展中的區域;由於它們各自有一些重要國家繼引人注目的經濟表現後,接著在政治民主化方面也有著大幅突破,因此逐漸成為學界的研究重心之一。在此,我們便企圖以台灣與墨西哥這兩個區域性的代表國家為例,來進行深入的比較研究。
    儘管上述兩個國家各自擁有著不同的歷史文化背景與社會組織結構,地緣環境方面也相距極遠,但它們在從傳統社會邁向現代民主國家的過程中,不論是政黨體系、政治運作規範、國家發展途徑、經濟成長表現、民主化變遷歷程,以及最近的整體轉型特徵方面,都有甚多可供統合歸類的相似之處;這些共通點同時也構成我們進行比較研究的根本基礎。
    在本篇論文中,我們希望藉由對民主概念的整理,利用「國際政治經濟學」的觀察視野,並透過「現代化理論」與「新制度主義」研究途徑間的互相補充,針對台灣與墨西哥這兩個國家的長遠歷史進行綜合與深入的剖析;一方面設法獲致其政治發展的真實面貌,同時也期盼對區域研究以及民主化理論做出一定的貢獻。
    IIn the 1980s, after the coming of a strong current of democratization called "the Third Wave", scholars who study about the Third World began to transfer their main focus from the economic level to the process of political development and the interactions of economic liberalization and political democratization. Especially to some counties in Eastern Asia and Latin America ( such as Taiwan and Mexico ), their achievements of reform have become more and more eye-catching.
    In spite of the different backgrounds of historical development, social structure and geographical position, Taiwan and Mexico have owned many points of similarity, for example, the party system, political norms, developing approach, process of democratization, and so on. Except for providing the analogy between above two countries, such similarities also constitute the foundation of my comparative studies.
    In this dissertation, I tried to view the matter of democratization with the approach of international political economy and neo-institutionalism. On one side, I will analyze the long history of Taiwan and Mexico deeply; and on the other hand, I hope simultaneously to make a contribution to the area study and democratization theory.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    政治學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2002000373
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Political Science] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2317View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback