English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 90756/120810 (75%)
Visitors : 25057274      Online Users : 361
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/84168


    Title: 我國與法國行政訴訟制度之比較研究---訴訟權能、權利保護必要、暫時權利保護與判決執行確保
    Other Titles: A Comparative Study in the Administrative Litigation between Taiwan and France(I)--- Standing, the Needs of Legal Protection, the Interim Relief and the Enforcement of Judgments
    Authors: 吳秦雯
    Contributors: 法律學系
    Date: 2012
    Issue Date: 2016-04-12 15:41:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 我國行政訴訟法自 2000 年實施修正新制迄今,在制度運作上與往昔制度相比,對 人民權利之保障已有大幅進步,但近年來由於我國社會經濟政治各方面情況受到內外 影響而快速發展,從先前的研究成果與近年幾則重要的行政法院判決當中,發現我國 行政訴訟制度當中,關於訴訟權能、權利保護必要性、暫時權利保護措施與判決遵行 確保制度,實有進行全面性實務判決研究與比較法分析之價值與必要。儘管德國相關 法制向為我國行政訴訟之主要繼受對象,但同採公私二元制的法國,在 2000 年 5 月將 長期以來的行政法院判例與各自分立之相關法規編修為行政訴訟法典,尤其其中新增 詳細的暫時權利保護制度與判決執行確保制度,對於我國實效有限的暫時權利保護制 度,與行政機關不尊重或不遵守行政法院判決的情況,或能提供另一角度的可能建議。 因此,本計劃希望以三年為期,探討分析我國 2000 年行政訴訟法新制實施後,關 於訴訟權能、權利保護必要性、暫時權利保護措施與判決遵行確保制度之實際運作情 況,並且援引法國行政訴訟制度作為比較研究之對象。而本研究之重要性在於,以我 國實務運作之判決為本,藉由法國行政訴訟制度運作與學理思維提出不同的觀察角度, 補充並豐富我國此部份比較法之研究成果,更進一步探尋適合我國制度之設計方向。
    The new Administrative Litigation Act was launched in 2000 in Taiwan. So far the new system has provided substantial progress in protecting people’s rights. However, due to rapid changes in socioeconomic and political environment, the Administrative Litigation system still needs improvements in certain areas, such as the Standing, the needs of legal protection, the interim relief and the enforcement of judgments. Although the German law has always been our major reference object, this study will use the French administrative litigation system as the comparative object. In 2001, a new Administrative Litigation Act was launched in France. In their new act, there are many new articles covering the interim relief and the enforcement of judgments that could provide some insights into our legal system in Taiwan. This research is a 3-year study aiming to explore and analyze the actual operation after implementing the new Administrative Litigation Act since 2000, and also compare to the French administrative litigation system and administrative court’s decisions. Based on the findings, this research will provide some suggestions which may contribute to improve the Administrative Litigation system and the protection of human right in Taiwan.
    Relation: 計畫編號 NSC101-2410-H004-217
    Data Type: report
    Appears in Collections:[法律學系] 國科會研究計畫

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    101-2410-H004-217.pdf892KbAdobe PDF462View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback